Saracon DSD to PCM converter: to which sampling rate should I convert?, [TOS #6: was “Saracon DSD to PCM convesion.”] |
Saracon DSD to PCM converter: to which sampling rate should I convert?, [TOS #6: was “Saracon DSD to PCM convesion.”] |
Jun 2 2012, 17:38
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 142 Joined: 1-January 05 Member No.: 18746 |
Hello ,
I am using Saracon DSD to PCM converter. I read in here that with saracon , converting DSDs to higher sample rates than 96khz is pointless. In other places I read that converting DSD data to sample rates of 176.4khz and 88.2khz is mathematically simpler and thus preferable . I tried both sample rates but am not sure which is better. 96khz sounds more detailed with better imaging while 88.2khz sound more clean or precise. I know these descriptions are vague but I was wondering if anyone with deeper understanding of the mathematical processes used by Saracon can give a definitive answer to which sample rate is preferable. |
|
|
|
![]() |
Jun 3 2012, 14:29
Post
#2
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 142 Joined: 1-January 05 Member No.: 18746 |
I understand no high sample rates are needed but isn't there an educated choice between 96khz and 88.2khz? Does the filter used by Saracon for DSD data allows to benefit extra detail in 96khz or is 88.2 is really the objective of that filter?
|
|
|
|
amiti Saracon DSD to PCM converter: to which sampling rate should I convert? Jun 2 2012, 17:38
Wombat QUOTE (amiti @ Jun 2 2012, 18:38) I read ... Jun 2 2012, 19:09
Wombat My "educated choice" would be to use 88.... Jun 3 2012, 19:06
amiti Bruce B , from my understanding , is a part of the... Jun 3 2012, 20:00
Wombat QUOTE (amiti @ Jun 3 2012, 21:00) Bruce B... Jun 3 2012, 20:23![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 21st May 2013 - 16:34 |