Retagging collection, need some advice.., DISCNUMBER, ALBUMARTIST, etc.. |
Retagging collection, need some advice.., DISCNUMBER, ALBUMARTIST, etc.. |
Jun 4 2012, 21:12
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 83 Joined: 14-January 06 From: Montreal, Qc Member No.: 27087 |
So I finally decided to retag my FLAC library because I want to get rid of the mp3 transcodes and only use FLAC instead. Will do with XBMC.
Now before I start, I'd like some advice on a few things.. EVERYTHING is tagged the same way right now: - ARTIST - TITLE - TRACKNUMBER - ALBUM - DATE - ENSEMBLE (for Album Artist, Tag&Rename used that.) Here's what I'm going to do, what I want to do: - Remove the ENSEMBLE tag and use ALBUMARTIST instead - Use TOTALTRACKS - Use TOTALDISCS - Use DISCNUMBER Now I'm wondering what's best.. Should I use a leading 0 for TOTALTRACKS, TOTALDISCS and DISCNUMBER or not? For albums that have only 1 disc, should I use the TOTALDISCS tag or leave it blank? Same for DISCNUMBER.. For multi-disc albums, TOTALTRACKS is for each disc or the total of all discs? I'm guessing it's per disc... Also, let say I have an album called 'Hello' and a CD-Single also called 'Hello' by the same artist. What's the best way to get the tracks of both releases not mixed together if I want ALBUM to just be "Hello" and not "Hello (CDS)" for CD-Single for instance? Is there a 'CDS' 'EP' 'Album' tag that most softwares recognize for that? For albums with a bonus disc, is there a field I should be using for the name of the bonus disc? A field where I can add 'Live in ...' for the bonus disc for instance.. Any other tags I should take in consideration apart from GENRE? That one's too subjective. I have thousands of albums to do, I just want to make sure I get things right before I start. Thanks! This post has been edited by BelleAndZEK: Jun 4 2012, 21:15 |
|
|
|
![]() |
Jun 5 2012, 09:49
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 1061 Joined: 4-May 04 From: France Member No.: 13875 |
Xiph.org proposes TRACKTOTAL and DISCTOTAL, not TOTALTRACKS and TOTALDISCS. No leading 0 required (or even desired).
VERSION can also be of use, when you can get your player to display it. -------------------- Save my friend from going homeless: http://outpost.fr/url/308w
|
|
|
|
Jun 5 2012, 10:20
Post
#3
|
|
|
Group: Super Moderator Posts: 4338 Joined: 23-June 06 Member No.: 32180 |
Xiph.org proposes TRACKTOTAL and DISCTOTAL, not TOTALTRACKS and TOTALDISCS. Yes, and foobar2000 since v1.1.8 beta has adopted the recommended field names, though with an option in advanced preferences to use the previous ones.
|
|
|
|
Jun 6 2012, 04:43
Post
#4
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 560 Joined: 1-December 02 From: India Member No.: 3948 |
Xiph.org proposes TRACKTOTAL and DISCTOTAL, not TOTALTRACKS and TOTALDISCS. Yes, and foobar2000 since v1.1.8 beta has adopted the recommended field names, though with an option in advanced preferences to use the previous ones.This worries me. I have a lot of FLAC files that were tagged using foobar2000 0.9.x and I use both these fields in my files. Is there a way to automatically 'update' the field names to the newer, official, Xiph proposed ones without having to manually sift through my files and re-tag them? Will the latest FB2K help me do this? If so, please tell me how to go about doing this. This post has been edited by rohangc: Jun 6 2012, 04:44 |
|
|
|
Jun 6 2012, 05:30
Post
#5
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 560 Joined: 1-December 02 From: India Member No.: 3948 |
Now that I think of it, please tell me whether this is the right way to update the field names:
Will this automatically remove fields 'TOTALTRACKS', 'TOTALDISCS' from files that contain them and replace them with 'TRACKTOTAL' and 'DISCTOTAL'? Please let me know. |
|
|
|
Jun 6 2012, 06:35
Post
#6
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 265 Joined: 1-October 06 Member No.: 35820 |
|
|
|
|
BelleAndZEK Retagging collection, need some advice.. Jun 4 2012, 21:12
Ouroboros I suspect that there are no definitive answers to ... Jun 4 2012, 22:13
db1989 Like Ouroboros, I can only report my personal pref... Jun 4 2012, 22:33
Ouroboros QUOTE (db1989 @ Jun 4 2012, 22:33) Indivi... Jun 4 2012, 23:24
db1989 But I use different types of case within the diffe... Jun 5 2012, 00:44
Ron Jones QUOTE Any other tags I should take in consideratio... Jun 5 2012, 01:14
JJZolx QUOTE (BelleAndZEK @ Jun 4 2012, 14:12) N... Jun 5 2012, 03:14
rohangc QUOTE (JJZolx @ Jun 4 2012, 21:14) COMPIL... Jun 5 2012, 03:54
BelleAndZEK Yeah forgot to mention COMPILATION. I never used t... Jun 5 2012, 04:00
JJZolx QUOTE (BelleAndZEK @ Jun 4 2012, 21:00) e... Jun 5 2012, 05:38
Porcus A few personal two-centers on both tagging and nam... Jun 5 2012, 09:30
Porcus And, if you have classical music: You cannot count... Jun 5 2012, 09:32
Porcus QUOTE (db1989 @ Jun 5 2012, 11:20) QUOTE ... Jun 5 2012, 12:35


rohangc QUOTE (EagleScout1998 @ Jun 6 2012, 00:35... Jun 10 2012, 11:32

JJZolx QUOTE (rohangc @ Jun 5 2012, 21:43) QUOTE... Jun 6 2012, 22:40
godrick I generally recommend you do not pad your tags, be... Jun 6 2012, 23:26
skamp foobar2000 (1.1.12a) uses whichever comes first, c... Jun 5 2012, 13:51
db1989 QUOTE (rohangc @ Jun 6 2012, 05:30) Now t... Jun 7 2012, 16:24![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 21st May 2013 - 21:53 |