Which sample rate should I use w/ Xonar STX? Better performance at 96?, [was “Which default sample rate for my sound card ?” in General Audio] |
Which sample rate should I use w/ Xonar STX? Better performance at 96?, [was “Which default sample rate for my sound card ?” in General Audio] |
Jun 29 2012, 14:12
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 310 Joined: 15-August 09 Member No.: 72330 |
Hello,
before I was doing in my dsp chain in foobar: sox set to 96 khz , followed by a big vst chain of dsp tweaked to my taste. But I've realized that overall my dsp were performing worse than with 44.1 khz. So now it's more like : big dsp chain followed by sox set to 96 khz. Why upsampling ? My reasoning: - the default sample rate of xonar stx after install is 96 khz - I imagine that if I use different software, with different sample rate, they must be mixed to a single sample rate at one moment. So I rather set a big sample rate on soundcard, and play music at that sample rate. - the measurements at tech report website, indicate that the xonar stx perform better at 96 khz , than 44.1 khz. for 44.1 khz : http://techreport.com/articles.x/17256/8 for 96 khz: http://techreport.com/articles.x/17256/9 - if I don't upsample , and set the default sample rate to 96 khz, I imagine that the upsampling would be either handled by the windows mixer or the driver of sound card ? So I rather use something that is well tested like sox. I'm not sure if wasapi would bypass resampling by system. - I can hear differences, but if you ask me to verify such claim, I don't know how it could be ABX ed. Here are sample rate supported by soundcard: 44.1 khz, 48 khz, 96 khz, 192 khz So which sample rate would you use , and why ? Since even tech report website indicate that the xonar stx perform better at higher sampling rate, is is pertinent to upsample using sox "on the fly" while playing music , or should I leave this work to the driver/soundcard/ windows mixer/ I don't know . Does wasapi allow to bypass upsampling if the the sample rate set on soundcard doesn't match sample rate of played music ? thanks |
|
|
|
![]() |
Jun 29 2012, 16:02
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Group: Developer Posts: 2983 Joined: 2-December 07 Member No.: 49183 |
QUOTE - the measurements at tech report website, indicate that the xonar stx perform better at 96 khz , than 44.1 khz. Do they? Or they indicate that 16 bits (44.1/16) is better than 24 (96/24)? |
|
|
|
extrabigmehdi Which sample rate should I use w/ Xonar STX? Better performance at 96? Jun 29 2012, 14:12
extrabigmehdi oops sorry if I didn't post on hardware secti... Jun 29 2012, 14:14
uart QUOTE (extrabigmehdi @ Jun 29 2012, 05:12... Jun 29 2012, 15:23
uart QUOTE (extrabigmehdi @ Jun 29 2012, 05:12... Jun 29 2012, 15:35
Ceniza On my side I have a Xonar HDAV1.3 Deluxe connected... Jun 29 2012, 19:43
extrabigmehdi So, I finally did this famous RMAA Test for the f... Jun 30 2012, 05:32
uart QUOTE (extrabigmehdi @ Jun 29 2012, 20:32... Jun 30 2012, 09:28
dhromed QUOTE (extrabigmehdi @ Jun 30 2012, 06:32... Aug 31 2012, 09:02
skamp I'm not sure the "Stereo Mix" featur... Jun 30 2012, 09:55
uart QUOTE (skamp @ Jun 30 2012, 00:55) I... Jun 30 2012, 13:14
lvqcl QUOTE while windows allows to set also another sam... Jun 30 2012, 10:49
extrabigmehdi Yeah I meant that the RMAA test was a bit unrelia... Jun 30 2012, 13:22
uart QUOTE (extrabigmehdi @ Jun 30 2012, 04:22... Jun 30 2012, 13:44
extrabigmehdi Ok , I've redone the rmaa test with "line... Jun 30 2012, 16:19
stephan_g You should be getting better 16-bit results still ... Jul 2 2012, 17:03
extrabigmehdi QUOTE (stephan_g @ Jul 2 2012, 16:03) You... Jul 2 2012, 18:22
YellowOnion I did my own loopback testing via sox after I was ... Oct 22 2012, 23:07
Kohlrabi Yet another hint to avoid ALIASUS hardware like th... Oct 23 2012, 00:40![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 22nd May 2013 - 21:02 |