Applying Gain to 16-bit Recordings |
Applying Gain to 16-bit Recordings |
Jul 18 2012, 11:07
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 468 Joined: 16-February 10 Member No.: 78200 |
I have a few questions regarding some 16/44.1 recordings I have that could be a bit louder. I wanted to boost the gain to somewhere around the point where peaks will be around -1dB without clipping. (It seems that typically the peaks are around -3dB and the meat of the recording is around 6dB and often lower.)
The files will first be upsampled to 32-bit(float)/44.1 and edited in iZotope RX2 Advanced. (Editing consists of light declicking, some possible noise removal between tracks, etc. and then resampling/dithering back.) My questions are these: 1. Is there any reason why applying gain would effect the quality of the original recording in the resulting product? (Would it have just been better to get the level set closer in the first place 2. Should the gain be applied before or after the editing (or does it even matter) assuming that number one isn't a boneheaded way to approach this with respect to quality? Basically I believe it would be ideal to make this... ![]() ...look about like this. (About 3dB louder.) ![]() (Sorry if these questions are a bit noobish. I've been reading my ass off through the archives and still can't quite get a grasp.) -------------------- The Loudness War is over. Now it's a hopeless occupation.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Jul 18 2012, 15:30
Post
#2
|
|
|
Group: Super Moderator Posts: 4355 Joined: 23-June 06 Member No.: 32180 |
Please note that some in that thread appear to be quite confused. Examples: Right from the outset, it is stated authoritatively that destructive normalisation is lossless, which it is not: any alteration to data is lossy, irrespective of the probability that it will be audible and of some people wanting to play redefinition by claiming that something can be effectively lossless.* Then later, someone implies that RG cannot normalise an album while maintaining dynamic differences among tracks, despite numerous posts immediately prior discussing Album Gain, which exists for precisely that purpose.
There are probably others, but I got put off quickly by (what I saw as) the concentration of misguided/ing information and the general lack of direction. * Nick.C appreciates this and accordingly is honest with words, as shown by lossyWAV et al. |
|
|
|
Engelsstaub Applying Gain to 16-bit Recordings Jul 18 2012, 11:07
Porcus Doesn't ReplayGain solve the problem? Jul 18 2012, 11:48
Engelsstaub The target is a FLAC image that will be burned to ... Jul 18 2012, 11:50
skamp It's rather the opposite. Permanently applying... Jul 18 2012, 12:16
DonP QUOTE (Engelsstaub @ Jul 18 2012, 06:07) ... Jul 18 2012, 12:32
Engelsstaub skamp: of course you're correct in the sense a... Jul 18 2012, 13:00
2Bdecided Your question is thoroughly discussed and answered... Jul 18 2012, 14:34
Engelsstaub QUOTE (2Bdecided @ Jul 18 2012, 08:34) Yo... Jul 18 2012, 14:46
Engelsstaub I appreciate that honesty in wording and efforts t... Jul 18 2012, 16:49
Porcus QUOTE (Engelsstaub @ Jul 18 2012, 17:49) ... Jul 18 2012, 23:11
AndyH-ha Various "editing" changes can make diffe... Jul 18 2012, 20:37
Engelsstaub Andy: Thanks. I guess I should have known that its... Jul 19 2012, 09:39
Porcus QUOTE (Engelsstaub @ Jul 19 2012, 10:39) ... Jul 19 2012, 12:13
bandpass Here's the first track of the "Black Tria... Jul 19 2012, 10:21
Engelsstaub bandpass: I guess I never really thought of it tha... Jul 19 2012, 14:28
Arnold B. Krueger QUOTE (Engelsstaub @ Jul 18 2012, 06:07) ... Jul 27 2012, 17:19
Engelsstaub Thanks, Arnold. Your reply was valuably helpful an... Jul 27 2012, 22:29![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 25th May 2013 - 00:20 |