MP3 conversion 320cbr to v0/v2 |
MP3 conversion 320cbr to v0/v2 |
Aug 15 2012, 17:10
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 13 Joined: 10-August 12 Member No.: 102193 |
pretty much the title...
if I have 320 cbr MP3 files (I'm going to assume all from lossless sources), would converting directly from 320 cbr to v0 or v2 result in lower quality than if I have converted directly from lossless to v0 or v2? This post has been edited by lostguru: Aug 15 2012, 17:11 |
|
|
|
![]() |
Aug 15 2012, 17:27
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Group: Super Moderator Posts: 9265 Joined: 1-April 04 Member No.: 13167 |
Yes. Whether the quality is audibly worse is a different matter, though I would hardly be surprised to see someone demonstrate that in a double-blind test.
Maybe you can reduce the size of the files using mp3packer or simply re-encode from the original lossless sources if they still exist. If the sources do exist then you might consider giving the artists their compensation if you haven't already done so. This post has been edited by greynol: Aug 15 2012, 17:31 -------------------- Everything sounds the same until it is proven otherwise.
|
|
|
|
lostguru MP3 conversion 320cbr to v0/v2 Aug 15 2012, 17:10
lostguru ah alright, 320 cbr really does take up too much s... Aug 15 2012, 17:49
DVDdoug Yes. There is theoretical/mathematical loss every... Aug 15 2012, 17:59
db1989 Also try out MP3Packer, which may be able to reduc... Aug 15 2012, 18:08
lostguru MP3Packer does help a bit, I used it often back wh... Aug 15 2012, 18:20
goa pride i converted all mp3 dj set from 320 to vbr V0.5
Do... Sep 9 2012, 14:58
Dynamic QUOTE (goa pride @ Sep 9 2012, 14:58) i c... Sep 9 2012, 16:39
goa pride QUOTE (Dynamic @ Sep 9 2012, 16:39) QUOTE... Sep 9 2012, 21:25
Dynamic QUOTE (goa pride @ Sep 9 2012, 21:25) 2) ... Sep 9 2012, 22:17![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 24th May 2013 - 11:49 |