How can I tell if my version of DSOTM was mastered with pre-emphasis? |
How can I tell if my version of DSOTM was mastered with pre-emphasis? |
Oct 4 2012, 02:01
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 276 Joined: 31-December 10 Member No.: 86948 |
Per http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index....st&p=810470, I looked at my CD of Dark Side of the Moon, and looked at the tedious but uninsightful discussion at http://www.stevehoffman.tv/forums/showthread.php?t=264920 , and still can't definitively determine if my CD has pre-emphasis or not. Any advice appreciated!
My CD is labelled on the top as: Stereo CDP 7 46001 2 DIDX 226 Made in the U.S.A. Manufactured for Capital Records, Inc. 1973 The Gramaphone Company Limited 1973 Capital Records, Inc. Around the inner ring on the top: DIDX 226 111A6 Around the innermost ring on the top: Made in USA - Digital Audio Disc Corp. On the back of the CD case, upper right: CDP 7 46001 2 DIDX 226 Barcode 0 777-46001-2 Cover of the booklet has the pyramid and prism spectrum graphic, and in the upper right a circle around "Pink Floyd the Dark Side of the Moon" On the back of the booklet, upper right: CDP 7 46001 2 DIDX 226 I bought it new in the 1980's for what it's worth. I used dBpoweramp to rip it and it did not detect pre-emphasis. The images shown on the first link above on discogs are exactly as on my CD, with two exceptions: - my CD has DIDX 226 on the inner ring of the disc itself which discogs specifically precludes from the version it is defining. - the outlined section on the left of the top of the CD image on discogs shows a second row of just "Made in the U.S.A.", while my version has "DIDX 226 | Made in U.S.A." moderator: please add "version" after "my" in the thread title - thanks! This post has been edited by godrick: Oct 4 2012, 02:35 |
|
|
|
![]() |
Oct 4 2012, 18:43
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 1468 Joined: 30-November 06 Member No.: 38207 |
Two samples from Money uploaded. One from the 20th anniversary edition, and then the suspicious one, a Japanese press -- the latter having positive ReplayGain.
They were ripped with dBpoweramp, which did not in version 13 log pre-emph. Since dBpoweramp does not (still not, AFAIK) subchannel, and from the Discogs information that there are indeed DSOTM pressings without the flag in TOC, I find it likely that the explanation is this is one such -- not that I simply overlooked the dBpoweramp screen; I cannot be sure, as they are stuffed away, so I cannot just find them and check with EAC. (Not all have jewel cases or booklets either, so might be hard to find ... what's $0.99 in the no-booklet bargain bin for another master of DSOTM?) I have the following AccurateRip IDs (for CDDB ID, the last 8 chars): 009-000f7b7c-00728677-680a1009 for the Japanese (Speak to Me / Breathe in one track) 009-000f86f9-0072c558-710a1109 for the 20th anniversary (ditto) 010-000f950c-00823fc1-810a120a for the 30th anniversary (two tracks) I also have a fourth one that turn out to have the same ID as the 20th anniversary. Likely a different pressing from the same master. -------------------- geocities.com/hydrogenaudio: http://goo.gl/tqYZj
|
|
|
|
Oct 14 2012, 15:03
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 3212 Joined: 29-October 08 From: USA, 48236 Member No.: 61311 |
Two samples from Money uploaded. One from the 20th anniversary edition, and then the suspicious one, a Japanese press Just to point out the obvious. The Japanese version has its spectrum significantly raised above about 2 KHz according to a CEP2 FFT analysis. Looks like premphasis. Sounds that way, too. |
|
|
|
godrick How can I tell if my version of DSOTM was mastered with pre-emphasis? Oct 4 2012, 02:01
slks Even most of the 80s CDs didn't have pre-empha... Oct 4 2012, 07:30
mjb2006 QUOTE (godrick @ Oct 3 2012, 19:01) Aroun... Oct 5 2012, 04:49
godrick ...which works great for pre-emphasized discs that... Oct 4 2012, 14:34
DVDdoug How does it sound to you?
As far as I know, I... Oct 4 2012, 17:58
Glenn Gundlach QUOTE (DVDdoug @ Oct 4 2012, 08:58) How d... Oct 14 2012, 17:39
Porcus QUOTE (Arnold B. Krueger @ Oct 14 2012, 16... Oct 14 2012, 23:35
Canar QUOTE (godrick @ Oct 3 2012, 18:01) moder... Oct 5 2012, 04:58
godrick mjb2006: thank you very much - it appears my versi... Oct 5 2012, 09:21
greynol I just verified that my copy of DTSOM is the same ... Oct 14 2012, 01:49
mjb2006 QUOTE (greynol @ Oct 13 2012, 17:49) I ju... Nov 30 2012, 19:20
greynol Allow me to give a little background on the issue ... Oct 14 2012, 17:46
mjb2006 For some reason I thought EAC did put FLAGS PRE in... Oct 15 2012, 01:18
edwardar I have the 'blackface' version with the sa... Oct 14 2012, 19:51
greynol How did you test it? Oct 15 2012, 03:07
mjb2006 QUOTE (greynol @ Oct 14 2012, 20:07) How ... Oct 15 2012, 12:53
Porcus I uploaded a third one.
Anyone who feels like ju... Nov 22 2012, 00:20![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 22nd May 2013 - 00:33 |