How can I tell if my version of DSOTM was mastered with pre-emphasis? |
How can I tell if my version of DSOTM was mastered with pre-emphasis? |
Oct 4 2012, 02:01
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 276 Joined: 31-December 10 Member No.: 86948 |
Per http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index....st&p=810470, I looked at my CD of Dark Side of the Moon, and looked at the tedious but uninsightful discussion at http://www.stevehoffman.tv/forums/showthread.php?t=264920 , and still can't definitively determine if my CD has pre-emphasis or not. Any advice appreciated!
My CD is labelled on the top as: Stereo CDP 7 46001 2 DIDX 226 Made in the U.S.A. Manufactured for Capital Records, Inc. 1973 The Gramaphone Company Limited 1973 Capital Records, Inc. Around the inner ring on the top: DIDX 226 111A6 Around the innermost ring on the top: Made in USA - Digital Audio Disc Corp. On the back of the CD case, upper right: CDP 7 46001 2 DIDX 226 Barcode 0 777-46001-2 Cover of the booklet has the pyramid and prism spectrum graphic, and in the upper right a circle around "Pink Floyd the Dark Side of the Moon" On the back of the booklet, upper right: CDP 7 46001 2 DIDX 226 I bought it new in the 1980's for what it's worth. I used dBpoweramp to rip it and it did not detect pre-emphasis. The images shown on the first link above on discogs are exactly as on my CD, with two exceptions: - my CD has DIDX 226 on the inner ring of the disc itself which discogs specifically precludes from the version it is defining. - the outlined section on the left of the top of the CD image on discogs shows a second row of just "Made in the U.S.A.", while my version has "DIDX 226 | Made in U.S.A." moderator: please add "version" after "my" in the thread title - thanks! This post has been edited by godrick: Oct 4 2012, 02:35 |
|
|
|
![]() |
Oct 15 2012, 03:07
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Group: Super Moderator Posts: 9365 Joined: 1-April 04 Member No.: 13167 |
How did you test it?
-------------------- Everything sounds the same until it is proven otherwise.
|
|
|
|
Oct 15 2012, 12:53
Post
#3
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 592 Joined: 12-May 06 From: Colorado, USA Member No.: 30694 |
How did you test it? I inserted my DSOTM CD and observed that EAC 1.0b3 reported 'No' in the Pre-Emphasis column. I then initiated a Create CUE Sheet (single WAV file) action. I looked at the cue sheet and noted it didn't put in FLAGS PRE on any of the tracks: CODE REM DISCID 680A1009 REM COMMENT "ExactAudioCopy v1.0b3" PERFORMER "Unknown Artist" TITLE "Unknown Title" FILE "Range.wav" WAVE TRACK 01 AUDIO TITLE "Track01" PERFORMER "Unknown Artist" INDEX 01 00:00:00 TRACK 02 AUDIO TITLE "Track02" PERFORMER "Unknown Artist" INDEX 01 03:57:35 TRACK 03 AUDIO TITLE "Track03" PERFORMER "Unknown Artist" INDEX 01 07:29:32 TRACK 04 AUDIO TITLE "Track04" PERFORMER "Unknown Artist" INDEX 01 14:34:42 TRACK 05 AUDIO TITLE "Track05" PERFORMER "Unknown Artist" INDEX 01 19:21:47 TRACK 06 AUDIO TITLE "Track06" PERFORMER "Unknown Artist" INDEX 01 25:45:12 TRACK 07 AUDIO TITLE "Track07" PERFORMER "Unknown Artist" INDEX 01 33:34:02 TRACK 08 AUDIO TITLE "Track08" PERFORMER "Unknown Artist" INDEX 01 36:59:47 TRACK 09 AUDIO TITLE "Track09" PERFORMER "Unknown Artist" INDEX 01 40:50:05 For reference, here's the output of cdda2wav -J for the same disc: CODE No target specified, trying to find one...
Using dev=0,1,0. Type: ROM, Vendor 'PLDS ' Model 'DVD-RW DH16ABSH ' Revision 'YL32' MMC+CDDA 983040 bytes buffer memory requested, transfer size 64512 bytes, 4 buffers, 27 sectors cdda2wav: Read TOC CD Text failed (probably not supported). #Cdda2wav version 3.00_cygwin32_nt_1.7.5(0.225-5-3)_i686_i686, real time sched., soundcard, libparanoia support AUDIOtrack pre-emphasis copy-permitted tracktype channels 1- 9 no no audio 2 Table of Contents: total tracks:9, (total time 42:56.55) 1.( 3:57.35), 2.( 3:31.72), 3.( 7:05.10), 4.( 4:47.05), 5.( 6:23.40), 6.( 7:48.65), 7.( 3:25.45), 8.( 3:50.33), 9.( 2:06.50) Table of Contents: starting sectors 1.( 0), 2.( 17810), 3.( 33707), 4.( 65592), 5.( 87122), 6.( 115887), 7.( 151052), 8.( 166472), 9.( 183755), lead-out( 193255) CDINDEX discid: rKs_PWM2y.8B7uVgxqJqzTDz7vs- CDDB discid: 0x680a1009 CD-Text: not detected CD-Extra: not detected No media catalog number present. scanning for ISRCs: 9 ... index scan: 1...difference: TOC:without, subchannel:with preemphasis correcting TOC... index scan: 2...difference: TOC:without, subchannel:with preemphasis correcting TOC... index scan: 3...difference: TOC:without, subchannel:with preemphasis correcting TOC... index scan: 4...difference: TOC:without, subchannel:with preemphasis correcting TOC... index scan: 5...difference: TOC:without, subchannel:with preemphasis correcting TOC... index scan: 6...difference: TOC:without, subchannel:with preemphasis correcting TOC... index scan: 7...difference: TOC:without, subchannel:with preemphasis correcting TOC... index scan: 8...difference: TOC:without, subchannel:with preemphasis correcting TOC... index scan: 9...difference: TOC:without, subchannel:with preemphasis correcting TOC... |
|
|
|
godrick How can I tell if my version of DSOTM was mastered with pre-emphasis? Oct 4 2012, 02:01
slks Even most of the 80s CDs didn't have pre-empha... Oct 4 2012, 07:30
mjb2006 QUOTE (godrick @ Oct 3 2012, 19:01) Aroun... Oct 5 2012, 04:49
godrick ...which works great for pre-emphasized discs that... Oct 4 2012, 14:34
DVDdoug How does it sound to you?
As far as I know, I... Oct 4 2012, 17:58
Glenn Gundlach QUOTE (DVDdoug @ Oct 4 2012, 08:58) How d... Oct 14 2012, 17:39
Porcus Two samples from Money uploaded. One from the 20th... Oct 4 2012, 18:43
Arnold B. Krueger QUOTE (Porcus @ Oct 4 2012, 13:43) Two sa... Oct 14 2012, 15:03
Porcus QUOTE (Arnold B. Krueger @ Oct 14 2012, 16... Oct 14 2012, 23:35
Canar QUOTE (godrick @ Oct 3 2012, 18:01) moder... Oct 5 2012, 04:58
godrick mjb2006: thank you very much - it appears my versi... Oct 5 2012, 09:21
greynol I just verified that my copy of DTSOM is the same ... Oct 14 2012, 01:49
mjb2006 QUOTE (greynol @ Oct 13 2012, 17:49) I ju... Nov 30 2012, 19:20
greynol Allow me to give a little background on the issue ... Oct 14 2012, 17:46
mjb2006 For some reason I thought EAC did put FLAGS PRE in... Oct 15 2012, 01:18
edwardar I have the 'blackface' version with the sa... Oct 14 2012, 19:51
Porcus I uploaded a third one.
Anyone who feels like ju... Nov 22 2012, 00:20![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 19th June 2013 - 06:55 |