Flaws in recent Opus codec? |
Flaws in recent Opus codec? |
Oct 13 2012, 11:53
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 5 Joined: 13-October 12 From: Germany Member No.: 103833 |
Hi everybody,
this is my first post here, even if i read this forum for a quite long time already. Recently i did some testing on the Opus codec an found a strange behaviour. I encoded a file with the official 0.1.5 binaries and had a look the frequency response. Knowing that judging quality with this is useless, i discovered a ~1000Hz /-3dB drop around 16 kHz which is not present e.g. in Ogg encoded files. This lead me to encode/decode a linear sweep for comparison and this finally showed a really messed up response for the Opus encoded sweep in the HF region. I am not quite sure if it is encoder or decoder related. For decoding i used the official opusdec and the foobar built-in one. Opus music sample: ![]() Oggvorbis music sample: ![]() Opus linear sweep: ![]() Oggvorbis linear sweep: ![]() What do you think? Could someone try to replicate or has this been noticed already? Thank you. Cheers! |
|
|
|
Dynamic Welcome to the forums.
Interesting. I also note t... Oct 13 2012, 16:58
145dBSPL Hi Dynamic,
thank you.
Yes, i forgot to mention ... Oct 13 2012, 17:45
Canar The big question now is: Can you actually hear the... Oct 13 2012, 19:16
145dBSPL In case of the music sample - this is a question i... Oct 13 2012, 19:58
saratoga Does the sweep sound any different if you use 48k ... Oct 13 2012, 20:13
145dBSPL Just did a quick test with a 48kHz sweep and both ... Oct 13 2012, 20:29
Canar To disambiguate, the problem still exists at 48kHz... Oct 13 2012, 20:43
145dBSPL Yes, i can confirm that it also exists on decoded ... Oct 14 2012, 12:26
romor I noticed similar, maybe same "issue" wh... Oct 16 2012, 14:40
Speckmade 145dBSPL, romor: Do your spectrograms show the mon... Jan 25 2013, 23:35![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 21st May 2013 - 17:21 |