Ripping old CDs to MP3 using LAME - Resample? |
Ripping old CDs to MP3 using LAME - Resample? |
Oct 17 2012, 02:54
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 154 Joined: 22-July 12 Member No.: 101637 |
Quick question to those who know a LOT more about high-quality lossy rips than I do.
Is there any perceivable benefit (or, perhaps, disadvantage) to upsampling CDs--which typically are encoded at 44.1khz - to 48khz? I've compared a handful of tracks at both sample rates and, so far, can't tell any difference between the two. Right now I'm running LAME 3.99.5 -v -V0 -q0 --replaygain-accurate. |
|
|
|
![]() |
Oct 17 2012, 02:57
Post
#2
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 4133 Joined: 2-September 02 Member No.: 3264 |
Is there any perceivable benefit (or, perhaps, disadvantage) to upsampling CDs--which typically are encoded at 44.1khz - to 48khz? No, and in fact its a pretty bad idea unless you need 48k output for some reason, and even then I would recommend resampling after decoding, not before encoding. |
|
|
|
BFG Ripping old CDs to MP3 using LAME - Resample? Oct 17 2012, 02:54
BFG QUOTE (saratoga @ Oct 16 2012, 20:57) No,... Oct 17 2012, 03:04
AndyH-ha Upsampling adds nothing but an increased storage s... Oct 17 2012, 03:16
BFG QUOTE (AndyH-ha @ Oct 16 2012, 21:16... Oct 17 2012, 03:30
halb27 QUOTE (BFG @ Oct 17 2012, 04:30) ...I do ... Oct 17 2012, 10:05
BFG QUOTE (halb27 @ Oct 17 2012, 04:05) If yo... Oct 17 2012, 17:17
greynol What's with the accurate replay gain scanning?... Oct 17 2012, 04:48
BFG QUOTE (greynol @ Oct 16 2012, 22:48) What... Oct 17 2012, 17:14![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 23rd May 2013 - 21:01 |