LAME 3.100 alpha testing |
LAME 3.100 alpha testing |
Nov 8 2012, 03:29
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 1314 Joined: 3-January 05 From: Argentina, Bs As Member No.: 18803 |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Nov 8 2012, 17:23
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 1465 Joined: 30-November 06 Member No.: 38207 |
IgorC: 190 vs 195 is oranges vs elephants ... seriously? Or did you read hundredandninetysomething vs twohundredandsixtysomething?
If it only takes a few sample signals to find one where 3.100 -V2 is ABXably better than 3.99 -V2 at the cost of 2.6 percent increase, then isn't that at this level a (small and preliminary) indication of a pretty good job? After all, the V of VBR is about knowing where to spend more bits. This post has been edited by Porcus: Nov 8 2012, 17:23 -------------------- geocities.com/hydrogenaudio: http://goo.gl/tqYZj
|
|
|
|
Nov 8 2012, 18:07
Post
#3
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 1314 Joined: 3-January 05 From: Argentina, Bs As Member No.: 18803 |
IgorC: 190 vs 195 is oranges vs elephants ... seriously? Or did you read hundredandninetysomething vs twohundredandsixtysomething? If it only takes a few sample signals to find one where 3.100 -V2 is ABXably better than 3.99 -V2 at the cost of 2.6 percent increase, then isn't that at this level a (small and preliminary) indication of a pretty good job? After all, the V of VBR is about knowing where to spend more bits. 1. It's not about a few kbps for some samples. It's for ALL samples. 2.Who guarantee that quality improvement come from smarter algorithms and not from pure bitrate increase? This post has been edited by IgorC: Nov 8 2012, 18:08 |
|
|
|
Nov 8 2012, 18:20
Post
#4
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 2257 Joined: 9-October 05 From: Dormagen, Germany Member No.: 25015 |
Who guarantee that quality improvement come from smarter algorithms and not from pure bitrate increase? A 5 kbps difference really doesn't change quality because of this small increase in bitrate. Please do think of bitrate difference in terms of average bitrate difference for a representable set of full length regular tracks. If bitrate is significantly higher with problem sample snippets this is very welcome! And look at 3.98.4's average bitrate in my post above. Your ABX log was about a rather modest improvement in quality. Maybe 5 kbps difference is sufficient to make up for this quality increase. With the samples I tested there is a severe quality improvement however, and cannot be contributed to a 5 kbps higher average bitrate. But we do know that robert significantly improved on the machinery, the small increase in average bitrate is just a side effect of this. This post has been edited by halb27: Nov 8 2012, 18:49 -------------------- lame3100i -V0.5+ --adbr_short 480
|
|
|
|
IgorC LAME 3.100 alpha testing Nov 8 2012, 03:29
IgorC As of bitrate for current alpha 2 it's (3.99.... Nov 8 2012, 03:59
Dynamic QUOTE (IgorC @ Nov 8 2012, 02:59) So I tr... Nov 8 2012, 16:09
halb27 I tested 3.100a2 at the -V2 quality level for lead... Nov 8 2012, 11:40
lameboy How is the LAME header written in 3.100? (I'm ... Nov 8 2012, 15:36
IgorC halb27,
Before anything. Does 3.100 -V2 comparabl... Nov 8 2012, 15:33
halb27 QUOTE (IgorC @ Nov 8 2012, 16:33) ... Doe... Nov 8 2012, 16:07
IgorC QUOTE (halb27 @ Nov 8 2012, 12:07) Averag... Nov 8 2012, 17:11
halb27 For a fair comparison (in terms of average bitrate... Nov 8 2012, 16:29
Dynamic Yes, I should have made it clear that I was really... Nov 8 2012, 17:17
IgorC QUOTE (halb27 @ Nov 8 2012, 14:20) A 5 kb... Nov 8 2012, 18:50
halb27 Average bitrate for my test set using -V5:
3.98.4:... Nov 8 2012, 17:27
halb27 I finished my -V2 listening test with herding_call... Nov 8 2012, 17:56
IgorC QUOTE (halb27 @ Nov 8 2012, 13:27) Averag... Nov 8 2012, 17:59
halb27 I tested 3.100a2 -V0 for the samples that were not... Nov 8 2012, 18:40
halb27 OK, so the -V5 quality improvement of this sample ... Nov 8 2012, 19:32
IgorC if 5 kbps doesn't matter then try 3.99.5 V1.9 ... Nov 8 2012, 20:52
halb27 3.99.5 -V1.85 yields an average bitrate of 195 kbp... Nov 8 2012, 21:16
IgorC Thank You for understanding, halb27.
MPEG tests ... Nov 8 2012, 22:07
shadowking As long as problematic samples benefit then slight... Nov 9 2012, 02:37
IgorC QUOTE (shadowking @ Nov 8 2012, 22:37) As... Nov 9 2012, 03:09
shadowking As i can tell the recent encoders are using mega-b... Nov 9 2012, 04:13
BFG Personally, I'm less concerned about bitrate a... Nov 9 2012, 07:05
halb27 So what we've learnt is:
- For an exact compa... Nov 9 2012, 07:49
saratoga QUOTE (halb27 @ Nov 9 2012, 02:49) - Espe... Nov 9 2012, 22:58
BFG QUOTE (saratoga @ Nov 9 2012, 15:58) I wo... Nov 9 2012, 23:32
Gainless Another sample, pre-echos on the kicks with -V 2 (... Nov 9 2012, 20:49
halb27 ???
IMO a selection of tracks should be used which... Nov 10 2012, 11:16
Kamedo2 I'm considering a listening test of this new L... Dec 2 2012, 07:50
Gainless QUOTE (Kamedo2 @ Dec 2 2012, 07:50) I... Dec 2 2012, 12:05
IgorC Kamedo2,
Performing a full test with an early al... Dec 2 2012, 13:53
Kamedo2 QUOTE (IgorC @ Dec 2 2012, 21:53) Perform... Dec 2 2012, 15:40
Kamedo2 A small a priori test of LAME 3.100a2.
3.100VBR V3... Dec 8 2012, 19:02
IgorC QUOTE (Kamedo2 @ Dec 8 2012, 15:02) Maybe... Dec 9 2012, 17:41
Kamedo2 QUOTE (IgorC @ Dec 10 2012, 01:41) Can I ... Dec 9 2012, 18:43
halb27 Wow! This looks great!
So despite its alph... Dec 8 2012, 22:03
IgorC Welcome to our world.
Today You clearly hear t... Dec 9 2012, 19:09
Kamedo2 QUOTE (IgorC @ Dec 10 2012, 03:09) Today ... Dec 9 2012, 20:17
Kamedo2 QUOTE (Kamedo2 @ Dec 10 2012, 04:17) Yes,... Dec 11 2012, 15:43![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 18th May 2013 - 12:16 |