FLAC1170: a ITU BS.1770 loudness scanner for FLAC |
FLAC1170: a ITU BS.1770 loudness scanner for FLAC |
Dec 2 2012, 17:26
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 398 Joined: 13-June 10 Member No.: 81467 |
FLAC1770 is a ITU BS.1770 loudness scanner and tagger for FLAC. For tagging it should do exactly tha same as "metaflac".
Binaries are available for Win32, Linux, and Linux64: CODE $ flac1770 FLAC1170 v0.1.0, a ITU BS.1770 loudness scanner for FLAC. Usage: flac1770 [options] <files> Options: --help: dispaly this usage information and exit. --version: dispaly version information and exit. --tag: write replay gain tags to the input files (off). --r128: use EBU R128 compliant presets (default). --a85: use ATSC A/85 compliant presets. --rg: use ReplayGain compatible presets. --reference=<float>: set reference loudness (-23.0). --gate=<float>: set BS.1770 gate (-10.0). --partition=<int>: set BS.1770 partition (4). --unit=LU|LK|dB: use the respective loudness unit (LU). --progress=on|off: display progress percentage (on). --true-peak=fast|medium|best|off: determine inter-sample peaks (off). Some examples:
This post has been edited by pbelkner: Dec 2 2012, 17:30 |
|
|
|
![]() |
Dec 2 2012, 17:32
Post
#2
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 437 Joined: 11-February 12 Member No.: 97076 |
Thanks for the software.
Shouldn't the / be \? Also, why is the ReplayGain calculated by flac1770 much different than the one calculated by foobar2000? This post has been edited by eahm: Dec 2 2012, 17:35 |
|
|
|
Dec 2 2012, 18:38
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 398 Joined: 13-June 10 Member No.: 81467 |
Also, why is the ReplayGain calculated by flac1770 much different than the one calculated by foobar2000? I've uploaded a corrected version 0.1.1: https://sourceforge.net/projects/r128gain/f...s/flac1770/0.1/. Fortunately only the absolute loudness values displayed in the first column "loudness" where w.r.t the ITU world and not w.r.t. the RG world. The differences between two absolute values doesn't depend on that, and hence the calculated gains where correct. I don't know how "foobar" calculates replay gain, i.e. whether it uses the RG algorithm or the ITU algorithm. Of course, the results of the two algorithms differ. This post has been edited by pbelkner: Dec 2 2012, 18:39 |
|
|
|
Dec 3 2012, 21:40
Post
#4
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 171 Joined: 1-October 04 Member No.: 17420 |
I don't know how "foobar" calculates replay gain, i.e. whether it uses the RG algorithm or the ITU algorithm. Of course, the results of the two algorithms differ. ::from foobar2000 1.1.7 change log: "Updated ReplayGain scanning code to the latest version of libebur128." ... so shouldn't the results be identical? Greetings, ... :: |
|
|
|
Dec 4 2012, 08:22
Post
#5
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 398 Joined: 13-June 10 Member No.: 81467 |
from foobar2000 1.1.7 change log: "Updated ReplayGain scanning code to the latest version of libebur128." ... so shouldn't the results be identical? flac1770 is based on lib1770 and gives exact the same results as r128gain which is also based on lib1770. Both tools implement ITU BS.1770-2: i.e. a gate of -10.0 dB and a block overlap of 75%, which is also conformant with the latest EBU R128 (2011). I don't know what fb2k or libebur128 are doing. Please note that the preliminary 2010 version of EBU R128 required a gate of -8.0 dB and a block overlap of 50%. |
|
|
|
Dec 4 2012, 11:31
Post
#6
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 171 Joined: 1-October 04 Member No.: 17420 |
|
|
|
|
pbelkner FLAC1170: a ITU BS.1770 loudness scanner for FLAC Dec 2 2012, 17:26
pbelkner QUOTE (eahm @ Dec 2 2012, 17:32) Shouldn... Dec 2 2012, 17:42
Wombat Hi, finally something to replace metaflac while it... Dec 3 2012, 03:18
skamp The first two thumbs show the same values, except ... Dec 4 2012, 11:46
Surfi ::
... so why that many decimals?
And why does f... Dec 4 2012, 12:17
pbelkner QUOTE (Surfi @ Dec 4 2012, 12:17) I know ... Dec 4 2012, 18:06
Surfi ::
Thanks for answering, all of your tools and yo... Dec 4 2012, 20:30
leo-bogert Very nice, thank you.
This is a component which I... Dec 4 2012, 21:55
Triza I use loudness command from libebur128. Works grea... Dec 5 2012, 00:33
Surfi QUOTE (Triza @ Dec 5 2012, 00:33) That us... Dec 5 2012, 07:58
Triza I have read through libebur128 thread and tested a... Dec 5 2012, 21:28
Surfi QUOTE (Triza @ Dec 5 2012, 21:28) ... Qua... Dec 6 2012, 11:29
jangk Target for EBU R128 is -23dBFS, but this possibly ... Dec 6 2012, 12:15
Surfi QUOTE (jangk @ Dec 6 2012, 12:15) Target ... Dec 6 2012, 15:35
pbelkner QUOTE (Surfi @ Dec 6 2012, 15:35) Have a ... Dec 6 2012, 17:39
Singtoh Hello All,
Just stumbled upon the r128gain progra... Dec 6 2012, 13:22
Surfi ::
Thank you very much for clarifying.
:: Dec 6 2012, 21:02
Singtoh Hello All Again,
I am not sure if this is the cor... Dec 7 2012, 05:15
pbelkner QUOTE (Singtoh @ Dec 7 2012, 05:15) 3. Th... Dec 7 2012, 07:42
Singtoh Sure thing, and thanks again for your hard work on... Dec 7 2012, 07:59
pbelkner QUOTE (Singtoh @ Dec 7 2012, 08:59) Sure ... Dec 7 2012, 17:42
pbelkner FLAC1770 v0.2.0 released
What's new?
Test cas... Dec 7 2012, 20:15
pbelkner FLAC1770 v0.3.0 released
What's new?
Computat... Dec 9 2012, 21:47
Wombat QUOTE (pbelkner @ Dec 7 2012, 21:15) FLAC... Dec 7 2012, 20:23
pbelkner QUOTE (Wombat @ Dec 7 2012, 21:23) How to... Dec 7 2012, 21:53
Wombat QUOTE (pbelkner @ Dec 7 2012, 22:53) By u... Dec 7 2012, 23:24
JJZolx As a casual follower of these threads, is there a ... Dec 8 2012, 06:01
pbelkner QUOTE (JJZolx @ Dec 8 2012, 07:01) As a c... Dec 8 2012, 07:33
pbelkner FLAC1770 v0.4.0 released
Download: https://sourcef... Dec 12 2012, 18:28
pbelkner FLAC1770 v0.4.1 released
Download: https://sourcef... Dec 19 2012, 18:58![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 19th June 2013 - 14:53 |