Mumble - Custom bitrate and ms., [moved from General Audio] |
Mumble - Custom bitrate and ms., [moved from General Audio] |
Jan 6 2013, 21:07
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 155 Joined: 6-August 11 Member No.: 92828 |
I was wondering as Mumble is an Opensource software, if i could change it to allow 2.5 ms (as opus allows it), and higher bitrate, maybe 128,156 or something?
I am not that good at compiling, but if anyone knows if it can be done without any real knowledge of coding, and maybe just change some places to allow it, it would be nice. Thanks:) |
|
|
|
![]() |
Jan 6 2013, 21:33
Post
#2
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 4132 Joined: 2-September 02 Member No.: 3264 |
I think very high bitrates and such extremely low latency don't really make sense for VOIP applications. What are you trying to do?
|
|
|
|
Jan 6 2013, 21:35
Post
#3
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 155 Joined: 6-August 11 Member No.: 92828 |
I think very high bitrates and such extremely low latency don't really make sense for VOIP applications. What are you trying to do? Probably not overall, but i only talk to one person currently. So the low latency of 2.5 with high bitrate like 128, makes sense for us. We are playing together and recording sometimes, and as low latency as possible really helps. So if itīs possible to make my own with a few changes it would be awesome, but i donīt think a Public version with those features makes much sense. |
|
|
|
Jan 6 2013, 22:39
Post
#4
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 4132 Joined: 2-September 02 Member No.: 3264 |
So the low latency of 2.5 with high bitrate like 128, makes sense for us. Yeah, but you combined latency from encoding, TCP/IP stack, network, decoding, audio output is probably 100+ ms at absolute best, and perhaps much higher if you're not geographically close to one another. You're trying to drop it from what, 10ms? That savings is insignificant compared to the total latency. |
|
|
|
zerowalker Mumble - Custom bitrate and ms. Jan 6 2013, 21:07
zerowalker QUOTE (saratoga @ Jan 6 2013, 22:39) QUOT... Jan 6 2013, 22:46
LithosZA Netjack2 might be better suited for your case than... Jan 6 2013, 23:32
zerowalker QUOTE (LithosZA @ Jan 6 2013, 23:32) Netj... Jan 6 2013, 23:37
jmvalin I think 2.5 ms frames are only really useful for s... Jan 8 2013, 03:31![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 22nd May 2013 - 04:40 |