Different results from RareWares’ LAME+libsndfile x86 vs. x64 compiles |
Different results from RareWares’ LAME+libsndfile x86 vs. x64 compiles |
Jan 7 2013, 02:07
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 170 Joined: 7-January 05 From: Germany Member No.: 18891 |
Hello,
I was wondering why the rarewares "LAME 3.99.5 using libsndfile 1.0.25" x86 and x64 compiles give different results (mp3) with the same source file (flac) and options. The difference is very settle (4 bytes) but the audio stream is different when bit-compared with foobar2000. Shouldn't the audio stream stay the same? Maybe john33 could check on that? Edit: The title got truncated. It should have been -> different results with rarewares "LAME 3.99.5 using libsndfile 1.0.25" x86 and x64 compiles This post has been edited by gottkaiser: Jan 7 2013, 02:12 |
|
|
|
![]() |
Jan 7 2013, 03:34
Post
#2
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 432 Joined: 11-February 12 Member No.: 97076 |
I just selected all four, foobar2000 divided the two.
Tested again: ![]()
This post has been edited by eahm: Jan 7 2013, 03:35 |
|
|
|
Jan 7 2013, 13:08
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 266 Joined: 3-August 08 From: UK Member No.: 56644 |
|
|
|
|
gottkaiser Different results from RareWares’ LAME+libsndfile x86 vs. x64 compiles Jan 7 2013, 02:07
db1989 Binaries compiled with different settings/optimisa... Jan 7 2013, 02:36
eahm RE: Different results from RareWares’ LAME+libsndfile x86 vs. x64 compiles Jan 7 2013, 02:39
gottkaiser @db1989
Sorry that I did not realize that it is a ... Jan 7 2013, 02:53
saratoga QUOTE (gottkaiser @ Jan 6 2013, 20:53) A ... Jan 7 2013, 03:09

gottkaiser Thanks for the objective part of the answer and th... Jan 7 2013, 03:17
db1989 QUOTE (gottkaiser @ Jan 7 2013, 01:53) @d... Jan 7 2013, 05:01
gottkaiser QUOTE (db1989 @ Jan 7 2013, 05:01) I didn... Jan 7 2013, 11:05![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 25th May 2013 - 18:32 |