Lame VBR to LAME CBR; Less frames, Shorter Time?!? |
Lame VBR to LAME CBR; Less frames, Shorter Time?!? |
 Jan 19 2013, 01:20
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 6 Joined: 19-January 13 Member No.: 105992  |
Hello guys,
Years ago i turned my cds to mp3, mostly in VBR. Now I'm cleaning my collection and re-doing the mp3s with 128kbps using the last version of lame. Tested the lame.exe and tested other apps thats uses lame. The result is always mp3s with a second shorter and less frames. I'm skipping something here? If you do a recode with 100 frames, you have an output with 100 frames? I'm wrong? And the output files is always using a lower values for replaygain... odd too... Off-topic: It's ok to use lame 64bit or it's better to stick with the safer 32bit? Thanks. |
 |
 
|
TheDogInBackyard Lame VBR to LAME CBR; Less frames, Shorter Time?!? Jan 19 2013, 01:20
BFG Many applications have an option to delete the lea... Jan 19 2013, 02:48 TheDogInBackyard It's not that... I know these options... Don... Jan 19 2013, 03:03 db1989 QUOTE (TheDogInBackyard @ Jan 19 2013, 00... Jan 19 2013, 03:15
TheDogInBackyard For "tag" replaygain in mp3s and other a... Jan 19 2013, 03:46 db1989 QUOTE (TheDogInBackyard @ Jan 19 2013, 02... Jan 19 2013, 04:33 TheDogInBackyard I don't really known what delay and padding at... Jan 19 2013, 08:23 lvqcl Install foo_verifier and test the 3rd file. Jan 19 2013, 08:57 TheDogInBackyard All fine with foo verifier. Status ok and none war... Jan 19 2013, 09:07 db1989 I’ll ask again since this is another thing that yo... Jan 19 2013, 13:46 greynol Lame has honored gapless decoding for several year... Jan 19 2013, 16:22 TheDogInBackyard Made some tests this morning... found the problem.... Jan 19 2013, 16:41 mjb2006 Here are some things to think about, things which ... Jan 20 2013, 15:51  |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 23rd May 2013 - 14:43 |
