File size and ms:ss ratio decrease when upgrading LAME, Is LAME 3.99.5 worse than 3.98.2? |
File size and ms:ss ratio decrease when upgrading LAME, Is LAME 3.99.5 worse than 3.98.2? |
Jan 23 2013, 17:54
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 4 Joined: 13-April 08 Member No.: 52744 |
I just upgraded from LAME 3.98.2 to 3.99.5. Using "-V 2 -q 2" I compared encodes from the old and new versions. Files from the new version were smaller. They also had less ms (mid-side stereo) frames, which could mean less efficient stereo compression due to encoding two separate channels and not taking advantage of things in common.
Is there a decrease in audio quality, or has LAME improved so much that it can maintain or improve quality despite this? Should I be using a particular recommended LAME version? |
|
|
|
dreamlayers File size and ms:ss ratio decrease when upgrading LAME Jan 23 2013, 17:54
db1989 Perhaps you shouldn’t be so quick to assume that t... Jan 23 2013, 18:57
JJZolx See the following thread, which asks pretty much t... Jan 23 2013, 18:58
Dynamic To the OP, that thread mentioned above, saying you... Jan 23 2013, 20:36
dreamlayers Thanks for the replies! It's nice to know ... Jan 24 2013, 01:07![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 19th June 2013 - 20:42 |