Bit Depth and aac *quicktime aac* |
Bit Depth and aac *quicktime aac* |
Jan 26 2013, 17:10
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 86 Joined: 22-March 09 Member No.: 68252 |
I have some needledrops, 24/96 *forget the hdtracks now cause i'm learning some new stuff*
andn i use izotope src and mbit to resample and dither to 48/16 i've apparently learned that there is no depth in aac *bit depth* and i'm curious, is it better to simply just leave all my drops at 24 bits so when encoded for portable use it will be used? In comparisons i've done when dithered and when just left normal the dithered files *when both are encoded to aac* result in slightly larger file sizes and higher bitrates *of maybe 1,2 o even 3 larger, than when converting from 24 bit sources. I figured with that being the case it must ignore bit depths and always use 16 bit anyway so I left it at that. If any experts could provide me insight it would be greatly appreciated as i'd like to know which is better and how much difference it makes *not in terms of listening tests but scienticially* |
|
|
|
![]() |
Jan 26 2013, 23:36
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Group: Super Moderator Posts: 9365 Joined: 1-April 04 Member No.: 13167 |
Will this silly notion that a listening test does not somehow constitute "science" when dealing with perceptual coding ever die?
This post has been edited by greynol: Jan 26 2013, 23:36 -------------------- Everything sounds the same until it is proven otherwise.
|
|
|
|
Mix3dmessagez Bit Depth and aac *quicktime aac* Jan 26 2013, 17:10
Mix3dmessagez when i said expert it was jokingly, really anyone ... Jan 26 2013, 22:04
saratoga Bitrate goes up slightly because the dither is har... Jan 26 2013, 23:11
Mix3dmessagez QUOTE (greynol @ Jan 26 2013, 17:36) Will... Jan 27 2013, 05:00
[JAZ] Correction: Dither is not used when resampling. It... Jan 27 2013, 10:10![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 19th June 2013 - 11:59 |