FLAC 24/96 to 16/44.1 |
FLAC 24/96 to 16/44.1 |
 Feb 6 2013, 09:45
Post
#1
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 118 Joined: 16-February 11 Member No.: 88210  |
I have 24/96 FLAC tracks and I want to dither it to 16/44.1. Will doing so reduce the SQ signicantly, and will it still be "lossless"?
-------------------- sin(α) = v sound/v object = Mach No.
|
 |
 
|
SonicBooom! FLAC 24/96 to 16/44.1 Feb 6 2013, 09:45
Mach-X Depends on if you have 'bat ears' or not. ... Feb 6 2013, 09:48 AndyH-ha QUOTE provided no conclusive evidence that such fo... Feb 6 2013, 10:37 Mach-X If no one could tell the difference, then what WAS... Feb 6 2013, 10:53
greynol QUOTE (Mach-X @ Feb 6 2013, 01:53) T... Feb 6 2013, 21:39 2Bdecided I assume it stands for Sound Quality EDIT: Mach-X... Feb 6 2013, 10:54 SonicBooom! Yes, SQ stands for Sound Quality. I'm not actu... Feb 6 2013, 15:01 AndyH-ha It isn't something to fight about, and I apolo... Feb 6 2013, 21:12 AndyH-ha Is there an official, published, definition or is ... Feb 7 2013, 00:51 greynol I am only aware of the distinctions between these ... Feb 7 2013, 01:30 IgorC http://audiophilesoft.ru/publ/my/16_44/11-1-0-36
... Feb 7 2013, 02:04  |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 23rd May 2013 - 14:57 |
