De-emphasis components, Postprocessor and a DSP plugin |
De-emphasis components, Postprocessor and a DSP plugin |
Feb 10 2013, 22:58
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Group: Developer Posts: 2986 Joined: 2-December 07 Member No.: 49183 |
Postprocessing plugin (works only with lossless sources):
foo_deemph.zip ( 47.29K )
Number of downloads: 218DSP plugin:
foo_dsp_deemph.zip ( 53.33K )
Number of downloads: 197sources:
deemph_sources.rar ( 9.59K )
Number of downloads: 60* Postprocessing (foo_deemph): works only with lossless sources; always active during playback and ReplayGain scan. * DSP plugin (foo_dsp_deemph): works with any source * To de-emphasize a track, add a tag named PRE_EMPHASIS or PRE-EMPHASIS with a value 1, on or yes. Other tracks are unaffected. * There's no reason to use both components at the same time. * Don't use both foo_deemph and foo_dsp_effect (the latter has its own de-emphasis postprocessor). * Note that even foo_dsp_deemph works only when a track is tagged: just adding it to the list of active DSPs is not enough to make it work. This post has been edited by lvqcl: Feb 24 2013, 19:57 |
|
|
|
![]() |
Feb 18 2013, 16:55
Post
#2
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 55 Joined: 6-June 06 Member No.: 31522 |
just tested with some preemphasis CDs and works like a charm - many thanks for this great and very valuable foobar-component!
|
|
|
|
lvqcl De-emphasis components Feb 10 2013, 22:58
Porcus Nice.
QUOTE (lvqcl @ Feb 10 2013, 22:58)... Feb 10 2013, 23:34
mudlord I should deprecate deemphasis support and just get... Feb 11 2013, 04:50
Sandrine Why another component? Mudlord already had a nice ... Feb 11 2013, 09:39
Porcus QUOTE (Sandrine @ Feb 11 2013, 09:39) Why... Feb 11 2013, 12:12
Sandrine QUOTE (Porcus @ Feb 11 2013, 13:12) it st... Feb 12 2013, 00:20
Porcus QUOTE (Sandrine @ Feb 12 2013, 00:20) QUO... Feb 12 2013, 01:18
lvqcl QUOTE (Porcus @ Feb 11 2013, 02:34) Assum... Feb 12 2013, 16:58
Porcus QUOTE (lvqcl @ Feb 12 2013, 16:58) QUOTE ... Feb 12 2013, 20:37
mudlord But end users might not want the extra DSPs, like ... Feb 12 2013, 21:43
Porcus QUOTE (mudlord @ Feb 12 2013, 21:43) But ... Feb 13 2013, 14:30
mudlord thank you for alerting me to the bugs, I really sh... Feb 16 2013, 12:11
mjb2006 I just tested with a sine sweep, generated with So... Feb 14 2013, 05:44
lvqcl foo_dsp_effect postprocessing service vs. SoX:
... Feb 14 2013, 16:01
nu774 Quickly glanced at the code: https://github.com/Fa... Feb 15 2013, 04:03
mudlord *delete this* Feb 17 2013, 23:32
mjb2006 Something else of note: foo_convolve results in mo... Feb 14 2013, 18:29
lvqcl QUOTE (mjb2006 @ Feb 14 2013, 21:29) Some... Feb 14 2013, 18:36
mjb2006 Oh, thanks...that did the trick. All is well with ... Feb 15 2013, 00:57
Sandrine I forgot to say thanks for keeping tag support the... Feb 16 2013, 19:02
kumbbl How good is the de-emphasis applied by the foo_dee... Feb 17 2013, 19:59
lvqcl QUOTE (kumbbl @ Feb 17 2013, 22:59) How g... Feb 17 2013, 22:03
mjb2006 I'm just eyeballing graphical frequency-analys... Feb 17 2013, 22:19
kumbbl QUOTE (kumbbl @ Feb 18 2013, 09:55) just ... Feb 19 2013, 05:59
mjb2006 With mudlord's new DLL I'm getting the sam... Feb 18 2013, 21:03
mudlord needs rewriting i suppose. people can use lvqcl... Feb 19 2013, 00:57
mudlord fair enough.
in the foo_dsp_effect thread, I made ... Feb 19 2013, 10:39
mjb2006 The latest update to foo_dsp_effect has resolved t... Feb 19 2013, 23:21
EpicForever OK, I have the question - what is the practical di... Feb 24 2013, 19:49
lvqcl I highlighted the relevant part in the 1st post wi... Feb 24 2013, 20:06
EpicForever That blue text was there before I asked the questi... Feb 24 2013, 20:17
lvqcl The text was there, the color wasn't Feb 24 2013, 21:20
ManekiNeko QUOTE (lvqcl @ Feb 10 2013, 22:58) * To d... May 6 2013, 00:52
lvqcl If all tracks were made with pre-emphasis then you... May 6 2013, 15:35
Porcus Is there any reason why these components are not i... May 9 2013, 19:29![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 25th May 2013 - 22:55 |