IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Opus advocacy/evangelism
jensend
post Feb 15 2013, 21:33
Post #1





Group: Members
Posts: 140
Joined: 21-May 05
Member No.: 22191



Thought I should start a thread for people to post links where people can voice their requests for Opus support.

The one that got me thinking about this is caniuse.com, a well-known site which shows the version history and marketshare of support for various browser features. Nice tool for webmasters etc. It has pages for the <video> tag and particular video codecs (H264,WebM,Theora), but when I went looking to see what it said about <audio> support, I found it had a table for the tag but not for audio codecs, instead linking to 2-3 year old outdated articles about codec support. Then I saw that someone had created a feature request for adding an Opus <audio> support table. That'd help people make informed decisions about using Opus in the browser.

Plenty of other pages out there where people have made Opus support feature requests, and I thought it might be nice to collect them and point people to them. Some of these are longer shots than others, and some organizations are less responsive to such input than others, but you never know.

In the absence of pages that display feature requests and allow people to vote or comment on them, people could simply coordinate about other forms of contact. (e.g. "I just sent suggestions@foo.com an email about Opus support; here's what I said about why it makes sense for them, and if you'd also be interested you could drop them a line too.")

A few requests I'd seen before that were the first to come up in a search were Spotify, Steam, and Windows Phone.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
jensend
post Feb 15 2013, 23:04
Post #2





Group: Members
Posts: 140
Joined: 21-May 05
Member No.: 22191



Nick.C- yes, Android support will be vital. The best link for that as far as I see is this AOSP issue.

Gainless, while having support built in to WMP would be nice, FLAC and Vorbis have widespread portable hardware support despite being ignored by MS. Despite so much of it being "their own technology" since the Skype acquisition, the sounds MS has been making during the RTCWeb process have not been terribly Opus-friendly. Momentum will have to come from other sources; if Opus and RTCWeb are widely adopted MS may eventually follow.

Media Player does not seem to be among the products for which MS has a real feedback program. (Most of those are listed here.) IE is, but I'm not sure how public that program is (I have some kind of MS login but haven't used it in ages and don't have the password handy, so it'd take me a bit to sign into their site and see) and I doubt that would be an effective channel. It may have been silly of me to include the Windows Phone UserVoice link, as that's probably no more likely to affect MS than sending your feedback to /dev/null. I guess the main reason I included it was that >75 people voted for it; there are other products and programs where if 75 people asked for Opus support it would be likely to reach somebody's ear.

But in any case I'd like to keep this from turning into a "support wishlist" or a debate about the merits or likelihood of having Opus support in different applications; we could have a different thread for that. I wanted this thread to be about actual opportunities to advocate Opus support. In this thread, if you mention something you'd like to see Opus support for, please provide a link, email address, etc where people can advocate such support.

This post has been edited by jensend: Feb 15 2013, 23:07
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
NullC
post Feb 15 2013, 23:25
Post #3





Group: Developer
Posts: 200
Joined: 8-July 03
Member No.: 7653



QUOTE (jensend @ Feb 15 2013, 14:04) *
, the sounds MS has been making during the RTCWeb process have not been terribly Opus-friendly
This is not the case.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
jensend
post Feb 16 2013, 00:14
Post #4





Group: Members
Posts: 140
Joined: 21-May 05
Member No.: 22191



I stand corrected. I had thought that the removal of MTI codecs in CU-RTC-WEB and the comments that were made about that issue seemed to indicate trouble, and that's the way things were spun by the press. I wasn't following closely enough to see things that pointed the other way e.g. that non-skype-related MS people supported Opus as MTI in RTCWeb, and in the months since August I guess things have been less fractious than some expected. If MS is showing signs that they'll implement support in IE that's great. Anyways, back to the subject at hand.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 17th April 2014 - 05:05