flac 1.3.0 pre-release |
![]() ![]() |
flac 1.3.0 pre-release |
Mar 4 2013, 07:56
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 609 Joined: 16-January 09 Member No.: 65630 |
Announced here: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/2...rch/003695.html
Git change log: https://git.xiph.org/?p=flac.git;a=summary -------------------- Scripts (mainly foobar2000 related): http://goo.gl/yje3h
|
|
|
|
Mar 4 2013, 07:59
Post
#2
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 58 Joined: 4-October 11 From: VA Beach, VA Member No.: 94145 |
Whoa. They've been on 1.2.1 for six years now, haven't they? I never saw this coming.
-------------------- FLAC -2 w/ lossyWAV 1.3.0i -q X -i
|
|
|
|
Mar 4 2013, 10:51
Post
#3
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 45 Joined: 27-November 11 Member No.: 95439 |
Whoa. They've been on 1.2.1 for six years now, haven't they? I never saw this coming. There was a discussion about The future of FLAC here half a year ago, so it isnt completely out of the blue. :-) |
|
|
|
Mar 4 2013, 11:01
Post
#4
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 1150 Joined: 4-May 04 From: France Member No.: 13875 |
Works fine on Arch Linux.
-------------------- caudec -c lossyTAK -q S *.flac
|
|
|
|
Mar 4 2013, 11:36
Post
#5
|
|
![]() Group: Developer (Donating) Posts: 717 Joined: 1-December 07 Member No.: 49165 |
As usual, Fidel Castro Loco ignored Windows.
|
|
|
|
Mar 4 2013, 11:52
Post
#6
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 609 Joined: 16-January 09 Member No.: 65630 |
mudlord, don't overkill. You spent so much ink on him already. If you follow the topic you'll see that it's tested fine under mingw/msys and issues and patches are further provided for msvc.
If you want to be constructive, no one stops you -------------------- Scripts (mainly foobar2000 related): http://goo.gl/yje3h
|
|
|
|
Mar 4 2013, 12:13
Post
#7
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 33 Joined: 4-February 02 Member No.: 1251 |
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Configuration Complete =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Configuration summary : FLAC version : ........................ 1.3.0pre1 Host CPU : ............................ i686 Host Vendor : ......................... pc Host OS : ............................. mingw32 Compiler is GCC : ..................... yes GCC version : ......................... 4.7.2 flac-1.3.0pre1.zip -------------------- AiZ stupid homepage - http://aiz.free.fr
|
|
|
|
Mar 4 2013, 12:36
Post
#8
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 38 Joined: 23-September 08 From: Salonica, GR Member No.: 58580 |
Configuration summary :
FLAC version : ........................ 1.3.0pre1 Host CPU : ............................ x86_64 Host Vendor : ......................... unknown Host OS : ............................. linux-gnu Compiler is GCC : ..................... yes GCC version : ......................... 4.6 My own Linux build could not decode 1 file out of 4 that were tested. It ended with an error: 03.flac: ERROR while decoding data state = FLAC__STREAM_DECODER_END_OF_STREAM This post has been edited by zfox: Mar 4 2013, 12:38 |
|
|
|
Mar 4 2013, 13:22
Post
#9
|
|
|
Group: Developer (Donating) Posts: 2053 Joined: 19-October 01 From: Finland Member No.: 322 |
Compiling it with MSVC required some modifications and I'm unhappy to see that it still can't encode larger than 2 GB files.
|
|
|
|
Mar 4 2013, 13:27
Post
#10
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 38 Joined: 23-September 08 From: Salonica, GR Member No.: 58580 |
I encoded 5 full random jazz/rock albums (-8) and I get a bit (less than 1%) more compression size than before. So, no improvement here.
|
|
|
|
Mar 4 2013, 20:20
Post
#11
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 186 Joined: 22-March 09 Member No.: 68263 |
My own Linux build could not decode 1 file out of 4 that were tested. It ended with an error: Does the file decode with 1.2.1? Also, have you run make check? If yes to both questions, this might be worth investigating. I encoded 5 full random jazz/rock albums (-8) and I get a bit (less than 1%) more compression size than before. So, no improvement here. You know that 1% more compression is quite a lot for lossless audio? As usual, Fidel Castro Loco ignored Windows. I really wonder why you think that. If you take a look at what has been posted today on the FLAC-dev mailinglist, you'll see he's been busy discussing and applying patches for MSVC, which is obviously for the Windows-build of the flac libraries and command line utilities. Something like FLAC doesn't need much platform-specific stuff because it has been developed in a very portable way. This post has been edited by ktf: Mar 4 2013, 20:26 -------------------- Music: sounds arranged such that they construct feelings.
|
|
|
|
Mar 4 2013, 21:14
Post
#12
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 437 Joined: 11-February 12 Member No.: 97076 |
Agree, 1% is a good improvement.
Why still no 2GB+ support? This post has been edited by eahm: Mar 4 2013, 21:15 |
|
|
|
Mar 4 2013, 21:22
Post
#13
|
|
|
Group: Super Moderator Posts: 4483 Joined: 23-June 06 Member No.: 32180 |
Yes, still being limited to 2 GB is a glaring problem. Considering that Case already showed that it is easy to support files of any size, this should be fixed in the official code at the earliest opportunity.
|
|
|
|
Mar 4 2013, 21:23
Post
#14
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 186 Joined: 22-March 09 Member No.: 68263 |
Why still no 2GB+ support? edit: Yes, still being limited to 2 GB is a glaring problem. Considering that Case already showed that it is easy to support files of any size, this should be fixed in the official code at the earliest opportunity. I just submitted this to the flac-dev mailinglist. @eahm: yes, but not everyone's reading HA that thorough This post has been edited by ktf: Mar 4 2013, 21:29 -------------------- Music: sounds arranged such that they construct feelings.
|
|
|
|
Mar 4 2013, 21:27
Post
#15
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 437 Joined: 11-February 12 Member No.: 97076 |
But there is a "patch", I am using Case's version and it has 2GB+ support.
|
|
|
|
Mar 4 2013, 21:34
Post
#16
|
|
|
Winamp Developer Group: Developer Posts: 662 Joined: 17-July 05 From: Ashburn, VA Member No.: 23375 |
Yes, still being limited to 2 GB is a glaring problem. Considering that Case already showed that it is easy to support files of any size, this should be fixed in the official code at the earliest opportunity. I just submitted this to the flac-dev mailinglist. @eahm: yes, but not everyone's reading HA that thorough A few of us are reading it. But it would be better for everyone to continue the discussion on the flac-dev list instead. |
|
|
|
Mar 4 2013, 21:36
Post
#17
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 38 Joined: 23-September 08 From: Salonica, GR Member No.: 58580 |
Does the file decode with 1.2.1? Yes. Also, have you run make check? I am doing it now. I hope It doesn't take forever. You know that 1% more compression is quite a lot for lossless audio? Actually, I said the opposite from what you understood. Files are bigger now. Also, less is different than equal. |
|
|
|
Mar 4 2013, 22:12
Post
#18
|
|
![]() Group: Super Moderator Posts: 790 Joined: 12-March 05 From: Kiel, Germany Member No.: 20561 |
Maybe Case could provide the patch file instead of the compiled binary, to help out the FLAC devs.
This post has been edited by Kohlrabi: Mar 4 2013, 22:14 -------------------- Audiophiles live in constant fear of jitter.
|
|
|
|
Mar 4 2013, 22:53
Post
#19
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 186 Joined: 22-March 09 Member No.: 68263 |
Actually, I said the opposite from what you understood. Files are bigger now. Also, less is different than equal. I tried a few files and you are right: the files are larger then with 1.2.1. However, this will not be the case with the final 1.3.0, because the size increase I'm seeing is exactly 4 bytes, probably because the vendor string is now 1.3.0pre1 instead of 1.2.1, that's 4 characters more But you're right: there have been no improvements considering compression, this release will be to keep FLAC up-to-date for developers mainly. -------------------- Music: sounds arranged such that they construct feelings.
|
|
|
|
Mar 5 2013, 00:08
Post
#20
|
|
|
Group: Developer Posts: 624 Joined: 6-December 08 From: Erlangen Germany Member No.: 64012 |
I tried a few files and you are right: the files are larger then with 1.2.1. However, this will not be the case with the final 1.3.0, because the size increase I'm seeing is exactly 4 bytes, probably because the vendor string is now 1.3.0pre1 instead of 1.2.1, that's 4 characters more OK, so aside from the vendor string, will 1.3.0 produce exactly the same FLAC bit-streams as 1.2.1? I'm just wondering whether 7- and 8-channel support is the only new feature for end users like me... Chris -------------------- If I don't reply to your reply, it means I agree with you.
|
|
|
|
Mar 5 2013, 01:05
Post
#21
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 437 Joined: 11-February 12 Member No.: 97076 |
You know that 1% more compression is quite a lot for lossless audio? Actually, I said the opposite from what you understood. Files are bigger now. Also, less is different than equal. Pink Floyd - Echoes wav: 238 MB (249,587,573 bytes) flac.exe 1.2.1: 119 MB (125,539,573 bytes) flac.exe 1.3.0pre1: 119 MB (125,537,329 bytes) |
|
|
|
Mar 5 2013, 03:46
Post
#22
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 3343 Joined: 27-January 05 From: England Member No.: 19379 |
could you (or anyone else) tell me what option i need to use to build just the .exe? i've tried compiling myself and it works but i'm ending up with an extra file named libFLAC-8.dll which is required for it to run. i guess i'm just missing a configure option? |
|
|
|
Mar 5 2013, 06:59
Post
#23
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 326 Joined: 26-June 02 From: Aix-en-Provence Member No.: 2400 |
./configure --enable-static --disable-shared
-------------------- http://www.unite-video.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?t=5412 :: An overview of all lossless Audio Formats (in french language ;-)
|
|
|
|
Mar 5 2013, 07:35
Post
#24
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 38 Joined: 23-September 08 From: Salonica, GR Member No.: 58580 |
Well, the first directory contains wav files that include no foreign metadata or tags. The second directory, files that were encoded with the Rarewares build. The third directory, files with my new linux 1.3.0 build.
CODE zfox@paokfc01:~/temp/wav$ ls -la total 2069368 drwxrwxr-x 2 zfox zfox 4096 ΞΞ¬Ο 5 08:18 . drwxrwxr-x 6 zfox zfox 4096 ΞΞ¬Ο 5 08:18 .. -rw------- 1 zfox zfox 644570348 ΞΞ¬Ο 5 07:22 Caravan - Ether Way.wav -rw------- 1 zfox zfox 466453388 ΞΞ¬Ο 5 07:22 King Crimson - Islands.wav -rw------- 1 zfox zfox 553853708 ΞΞ¬Ο 5 07:22 Miles Davis - Miles Ahead [Rem 2000].wav -rw------- 1 zfox zfox 454088924 ΞΞ¬Ο 5 07:22 Pete Sinfield - Still [Rem 2004].wav zfox@paokfc01:~/temp/wav$ cd ../1.2.1_rarewares zfox@paokfc01:~/temp/1.2.1_rarewares$ ls -la total 1180348 drwxrwxr-x 2 zfox zfox 4096 ΞΞ¬Ο 5 08:03 . drwxrwxr-x 6 zfox zfox 4096 ΞΞ¬Ο 5 08:18 .. -rw------- 1 zfox zfox 369762707 ΞΞ¬Ο 5 07:40 Caravan - Ether Way.flac -rw------- 1 zfox zfox 213436874 ΞΞ¬Ο 5 07:40 King Crimson - Islands.flac -rw------- 1 zfox zfox 345233967 ΞΞ¬Ο 5 07:40 Miles Davis - Miles Ahead [Rem 2000].flac -rw------- 1 zfox zfox 280174671 ΞΞ¬Ο 5 07:40 Pete Sinfield - Still [Rem 2004].flac zfox@paokfc01:~/temp/1.2.1_rarewares$ cd ../1.3.0 zfox@paokfc01:~/temp/1.3.0$ ls -la total 1180584 drwxrwxr-x 2 zfox zfox 4096 ΞΞ¬Ο 5 08:17 . drwxrwxr-x 6 zfox zfox 4096 ΞΞ¬Ο 5 08:18 .. -rw------- 1 zfox zfox 369829421 ΞΞ¬Ο 5 07:22 Caravan - Ether Way.flac -rw------- 1 zfox zfox 213499535 ΞΞ¬Ο 5 07:22 King Crimson - Islands.flac -rw------- 1 zfox zfox 345297053 ΞΞ¬Ο 5 07:22 Miles Davis - Miles Ahead [Rem 2000].flac -rw------- 1 zfox zfox 280237221 ΞΞ¬Ο 5 07:22 Pete Sinfield - Still [Rem 2004].flac All files were encoded with '-8' compression level and were chosen randomly out of thousands. This post has been edited by zfox: Mar 5 2013, 07:37 |
|
|
|
Mar 5 2013, 07:38
Post
#25
|
|
![]() Group: Super Moderator Posts: 790 Joined: 12-March 05 From: Kiel, Germany Member No.: 20561 |
The >4GB files patch can be found at kode54's FLAC github.
-------------------- Audiophiles live in constant fear of jitter.
|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 20th June 2013 - 13:13 |