Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Listening Tests
Hydrogenaudio Forums > Hydrogenaudio Forum > Listening Tests
Pages: 1, 2, 3
  1. Informal Listening Test Poll #5 (4 replies)
  2. MP3 Listening Test at 128 kbps (226 replies)
  3. Fifth Contender of MP3 Listening Test (7 replies)
  4. Informal Listening Test Poll #4 (4 replies)
  5. Is PCABX.com dead? (11 replies)
  6. The relationship between perceived quality and loudness! thanks (2 replies)
  7. Informal Listening Test poll #3 discussion (0 replies)
  8. Informal Listening Test poll #3 (13 replies)
  9. ISO AAC encoder (3 replies)
  10. Spatial Sound Attributes (0 replies)
  11. Infromal Listening test #2 discussion (4 replies)
  12. Informal listening test poll #2 (8 replies)
  13. anyone can help me search this paper (5 replies)
  14. How to make time synchronization in PEAQ (5 replies)
  15. Question about the objective audio quality metric for parametric codec (2 replies)
  16. Anyone can help me about the test audio sequences applied in ITU BS. 1 (7 replies)
  17. Regarding 48kbps AAC encoder comparison (1 replies)
  18. WMA10pro @48 2-pass VBR vs AC-3 CBR 160 Stereo (5 replies)
  19. Personal iTunes 7.5 AAC Problem Track Test (10 replies)
  20. 64kbps AAC/MP4 or 128kbps MP3 - Which is better? (9 replies)
  21. Results for 24bit/96KHz test (71 replies)
  22. SACD & DVD-A vs CD (3 replies)
  23. Don't you hear it? (20 replies)
  24. I want to hear the difference (9 replies)
  25. A personal LAME APS problem tracks test. (26 replies)
  26. testing of some sound files using OPERA\CRC SEAQ (4 replies)
  27. Another 'Over The Top' hardware review from Andrew :-) (4 replies)
  28. My Ears are rubbish (1 replies)
  29. "ASIO" vs. Directsound (32 replies)
  30. iPod compatible formats listening evaluation (32 replies)
  31. Help with listening tests (14 replies)
  32. 16 bit vs 24 bit (66 replies)
  33. So what instruments are hard to encode *usually*? (2 replies)
  34. Moderation / deletion of Free & Legal MP3 samples: (7 replies)
  35. Why lower bitrate get better? (3 replies)
  36. Power Leads - Hmmmm (9 replies)
  37. Testing audo program playback (0 replies)
  38. Testing Help (1 replies)
  39. AES conference London: High Resolution perception (14 replies)
  40. Test Lossless Files (5 replies)
  41. 320Kb/s MP3 vs. WAV (17 replies)
  42. audibility of polarity inversion (29 replies)
  43. Listening Test: 320kbps vs Lossless (26 replies)
  44. Potential Biases in MUSHRA Listening Tests ? (2 replies)
  45. Multiformat 5.1 ch Listening Test (req) (11 replies)
  46. Very high bitrate listening test (~320-400kbps) (36 replies)
  47. Double-blind test of SACD and DVD-A vs. Redbook 16/44 in JAES Septembe (33 replies)
  48. Lame 3.98b5-killer MP3 sample (7 replies)
  49. End of the MP3? Quality still good, but far from great (29 replies)
  50. High Definition Audio Samples? (22 replies)
  51. Multiformat 64 kbps Listening Test (134 replies)
  52. Personal Multiformat ABC/HR test at 96 kbit/s (11 replies)
  53. Introducing distortion for perceptual testing (2 replies)
  54. Short re-encoding blind listening test (38 replies)
  55. How would you test real-time encoding/decoding? (2 replies)
  56. Adaptive double-blind listening tests? (0 replies)
  57. playlist for audio tests? (2 replies)
  58. US vs. UK release of a given album (4 replies)
  59. ABC/HR on Linux (5 replies)
  60. How to tell if a file is transcoded from lossy to lossy? (5 replies)
  61. Audibility of inverted polarity in real music (51 replies)
  62. Foiled in my ABX attempt by Foobar2000 (11 replies)
  63. Historical Lame Listening Test? (8 replies)
  64. Magazine "double blind" tests Apple's DRM and unDRM' (2 replies)
  65. Personal evaluation at ~130..135 kbps, 200 samples (147 replies)
  66. 192 kbit/s listening test at SoundExpert (92 replies)
  67. ABX : aoTuV b5 & Lame 3.97 (10 replies)
  68. Help needed to find distortion introduced due to filtering (1 replies)
  69. Need some Ripping format advice from people with better ears than me (15 replies)
  70. HTPC Test Methodology Question. (10 replies)
  71. I need to borrow your ears for a couple of minutes (6 replies)
  72. objective evaluation of audio encoders (7 replies)
  73. STEP (Subjective Test and Evaluation Program) (3 replies)
  74. Flawed conclusions on WMA (40 replies)
  75. Transcoding test (1 replies)
  76. (flawed) AAC listening test on digg (5 replies)
  77. Flac vs Ape audible difference question (32 replies)
  78. Audio Diffmaker: signal difference extraction software (13 replies)
  79. Searching samples from Roberto's listening test at 64kbps (3 replies)
  80. Nero LC-AAC vs. aoTuV beta 5 (13 replies)
  81. Better quality or not? (7 replies)
  82. AIFF vs. Apple Lossless (16 replies)
  83. 80 kbps LC AAC listening test (51 replies)
  84. ABC/HR & BS.1116 scales (2 replies)
  85. Samples and Copyright (1 replies)
  86. New Listening Test in 2007 (60 replies)
  87. ABX methodology for home stereo testing environment (6 replies)
  88. How to avoid spectral analysis of samples (19 replies)
  89. Moved: Can I make a button to hide/show a panel? (-- replies)
  90. Hardware testing, computerized switchboxes (0 replies)
  91. PS3 128kbps AAC and MP3 encodes... (0 replies)
  92. Multiformat 48 kbps Listening Test (181 replies)
  93. EBU subjective listening tests on low bit rate audio codecs (1 replies)
  94. The MUSHRA anchor (3 replies)
  95. Rhapsody v. Urge Streaming Listening Test (2 replies)
  96. What about sound card hardware, drivers, speakers, etc? (2 replies)
  97. Transparency Listening Tests (12 replies)
  98. quality check (2 replies)
  99. iPod-ABX (6 replies)
  100. Initial release of the RateIt tool for performing MUSHRA listening tes (0 replies)
  101. Document about listening test conduction (24 replies)
  102. APE vs FLAC (19 replies)
  103. ABX software (13 replies)
  104. Is there clipping? (53 replies)
  105. UDial & Hearing Damage (2 replies)
  106. Last Listening Test in 2006 (15 replies)
  107. Autumn 2006 Listening Test (326 replies)
  108. Soundstage and Imaging (7 replies)
  109. Personal 64kbps listening test; multi-format (11 replies)
  110. ABX Just Destroyed My Ego (101 replies)
  111. W800i Listening Tests (2 replies)
  112. Artifact training (11 replies)
  113. Personal test finished, but can't process the results (5 replies)
  114. How to Organize a Public Listening Test? (2 replies)
  115. Which is better? 160 kb wma or the Itunes MPEG-4 AAC? (7 replies)
  116. WMAPro vs Nero HE-AAC-v2 64kbps test (6 replies)
  117. Training for listening tests (10 replies)
  118. Silly people (9 replies)
  119. MPC vs OGG VORBIS vs MP3 at 175 kbps (111 replies)
  120. ABX software for portable players (0 replies)
  121. Power cable long term blind test (22 replies)
  122. Bitrate estimates for the upcoming 128 kbps test (29 replies)
  123. New Listening Test (204 replies)
  124. XY instead of ABX (6 replies)
  125. Multiformat 48 kbps Listening Test Poll (45 replies)
  126. Best headphones/speakers for listening tests (9 replies)
  127. All headphones being equal ? (32 replies)
  128. Streamed audio test? (8 replies)
  129. High Frequency Ring Tone (31 replies)
  130. New 128 kbit/s listening test at SoundExpert (62 replies)
  131. High end vs low end cd players and amplifiers (8 replies)
  132. Lame problem samples no longer available? (2 replies)
  133. Multiformat 48 kbps Listening Test (117 replies)
  134. tiny personal listening test (13 replies)
  135. Hear the difference (18 replies)
  136. Hearing Levels in US Adults - New Study (3 replies)
  137. AXYZ test, how to get the p value ? (7 replies)
  138. Should the test participant be aware of that there are two identical c (2 replies)
  139. whats the difference? Lossless & Lossy question (2 replies)
  140. Double blind? But how? (7 replies)
  141. Audibility of difference signal (29 replies)
  142. ABX infallible? (6 replies)
  143. ABC/HR rating scale accuracy (1 replies)
  144. What is the point of 96khz? (4 replies)
  145. LAME MP3 vs iTunes AAC (25 replies)
  146. Listening test arrangement, (0 replies)
  147. Lossy Codecs Frequency Evaluation and a question (15 replies)
  148. Yello sample - additional VBR 128 test (9 replies)
  149. Plotting listening tests graphs (15 replies)
  150. AAC - 96 kbps, Intensity Stereo Test (19 replies)
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.