Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Psytel AAC questions
Hydrogenaudio Forums > Lossy Audio Compression > AAC > AAC - General
Beebo
First, i'd like to congratulate Ivan for great work he did ( bravo majstore smile.gif )

And now, some questions:

I have downloaded the latest version of Psytel AAC ( jan 31. 2002. ) and i normally encode @archive quality. i'd like to know what's the profile thingy?
All AAC's i have are LC profile, are there any better profiles? Thanx
Sachankara
LC is supposed to be the best at the moment...
john33
Latest version is 2.11 dated Feb 10.

john33
wildboar
QUOTE
Originally posted by john33
Latest version is 2.11 dated Feb 10.

*********** PsyTEL® MPEG-4 AAC Encoder V2.12 (build Feb 10 2002) ***********
Copyright © 1999-2002 PsyTEL Research
Copyright © 1999-2002 Ivan Dimkovic
Agent69
Yeah, you've got to give it to Ivan. He really maintains his software.


Agent69:)
john33
Damn, did I miss one?!?!biggrin.gif

john33
rjamorim
Ok, latest AACenc and OggDec beta versions uploaded.

Now, I'm going back to the beach. Stop bothering me :-P biggrin.gif

IŽll be back next monday.

Kind regards;

Roberto.
Ivan Dimkovic
AACEnc 2.12 has experimental quality controlled VBR mode:

-qvbr N

where N could be in the range from 0 to 100

This is very experimental switch, and there are several issues:

1. It does not support Intensity Stereo, and so it is very hard to compare very low bitrate modes with Ogg with Fake Stereo (intensity stereo will save 15-25% of the bitrate, but with losing phase information)


2. It is still not designed for "audiophile" quality, and quality of 100 will give 140-170 Kbps files

3. It is not optimized, and still experimental (did I say that already?)
Beebo
just checked it...
it's 2.11, Feb 10 smile.gif
Agent69
Ivan,

Have you been doing other optimizations in general, besides the "experimental quality controlled VBR mode"?

When I read this thread, I decided to download the newest version, v2.12 and compare it to an aac created from a January '02 version of aacenc. Using a ripped wave of Richard Marx's Hazard, I encoded with only the -normal switch, which is what I always use.

Both sounded the same to me but I notice that the newer version produces slightly smaller files. For example, The Jan '02 edition of aacenc I used produced a file 6,481kb in size, while version 2.12 produces a file 6,147kb in size.
Agent69
QUOTE
Originally posted by Beebo
just checked it...
it's 2.11, Feb 10 smile.gif


I just downloaded v2.12 (Feb 10) from Roberto.
Agent69
Maybe it is just that particular track. I just did the same thing with "Duel Of The Fates", by John Williams, and it is the same size as the original.:confused:
sven_Bent
qhy dont yuo se if the bits are the same by running some CRC32 check on both files and see if the checksum is the same
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.