First, i'd like to congratulate Ivan for great work he did ( bravo majstore

)
And now, some questions:
I have downloaded the latest version of Psytel AAC ( jan 31. 2002. ) and i normally encode @archive quality. i'd like to know what's the profile thingy?
All AAC's i have are LC profile, are there any better profiles? Thanx
Sachankara
Feb 14 2002, 05:58
LC is supposed to be the best at the moment...
john33
Feb 14 2002, 06:13
Latest version is 2.11 dated Feb 10.
john33
wildboar
Feb 14 2002, 12:48
QUOTE
Originally posted by john33
Latest version is 2.11 dated Feb 10.
*********** PsyTEL® MPEG-4 AAC Encoder V2.12 (build Feb 10 2002) ***********
Copyright © 1999-2002 PsyTEL Research
Copyright © 1999-2002 Ivan Dimkovic
Agent69
Feb 14 2002, 13:00
Yeah, you've got to give it to Ivan. He really maintains his software.
Agent69:)
john33
Feb 14 2002, 14:02
Damn, did I miss one?!?!
john33
rjamorim
Feb 14 2002, 15:34
Ok, latest AACenc and OggDec beta versions uploaded.
Now, I'm going back to the beach. Stop bothering me :-P
IŽll be back next monday.
Kind regards;
Roberto.
Ivan Dimkovic
Feb 14 2002, 16:25
AACEnc 2.12 has experimental quality controlled VBR mode:
-qvbr N
where N could be in the range from 0 to 100
This is very experimental switch, and there are several issues:
1. It does not support Intensity Stereo, and so it is very hard to compare very low bitrate modes with Ogg with Fake Stereo (intensity stereo will save 15-25% of the bitrate, but with losing phase information)
2. It is still not designed for "audiophile" quality, and quality of 100 will give 140-170 Kbps files
3. It is not optimized, and still experimental (did I say that already?)
just checked it...
it's 2.11, Feb 10
Agent69
Feb 15 2002, 19:07
Ivan,
Have you been doing other optimizations in general, besides the "experimental quality controlled VBR mode"?
When I read this thread, I decided to download the newest version, v2.12 and compare it to an aac created from a January '02 version of aacenc. Using a ripped wave of Richard Marx's Hazard, I encoded with only the -normal switch, which is what I always use.
Both sounded the same to me but I notice that the newer version produces slightly smaller files. For example, The Jan '02 edition of aacenc I used produced a file 6,481kb in size, while version 2.12 produces a file 6,147kb in size.
Agent69
Feb 15 2002, 19:09
QUOTE
Originally posted by Beebo
just checked it...
it's 2.11, Feb 10
I just downloaded v2.12 (Feb 10) from Roberto.
Agent69
Feb 15 2002, 19:21
Maybe it is just that particular track. I just did the same thing with "Duel Of The Fates", by John Williams, and it is the same size as the original.:confused:
sven_Bent
Feb 16 2002, 01:45
qhy dont yuo se if the bits are the same by running some CRC32 check on both files and see if the checksum is the same
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.