Everybody DOESN'T know the results of ff123's test. I for one don't. That's why I sought clarification.

It's the same as if someone were to say that Bush won the 2000 election and someone else came along and said "Wrong" and proceeded to post the results of the 1996 election.

If I point out what I believe to be the errors in your post I'm "nitpicking". When you pointed out what you believed to be the errors in fragtal's post, what was that? Something else?

It's not the same at all. I posted updated information. In your example the information would be outdated.
If you didn't understand the context I can't help you, but I'm pretty sure many people who haven't even heard about ff123 understood what I was going after. If you still want to continue this, do it somewhere else.

I'm not going "somewhere else". You go "somewhere else". This discussion BELONGS here.

If you'rwe not MAN enough to admit to your mistakes, that's YOUR problem.

OK, it's the same as if someone were to say that Clintion won the 1996 election and someone else came along and said "Wrong" and proceeded to post the results of the 2000 election.

lol.. I already did admit that the interpretion of what I meant can be ambiguous. Also I already explained what I meant, so what more do you want?

But I really don't think that the discussion of how to interpret one of my words regarding the overall issue belongs under this topic, especially since I already explained it once.

No, it's more like if somebody today would say that Clinton was a very irreproachable president, not knowing or caring anything about the Monica Lewinsky case, and somebody would say "wrong" to that claim...

erm... Would somebody bother to explain me why has Greg been banned?

Because of this thread?

Of course not.. I don't think we must publically explain these over and over again..
http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index....showtopic=11438