Hi David! Thank you for the replay!
QUOTE
That's not nonsense.
I'm glad to hear it!
QUOTE
Accepting that a Trance track should have more bass than a classical piece, but knowing that most Trance tracks should (probably) have a similar amount of bass, and that any that don't probably need a little correction.
Is that the kind of idea?
Exactly!
QUOTE
I'm not going to say it's impossible, because people used to say that it was impossible to do what replay gain does! In truth, Replay Gain is just less imperfect than most people assumed it could be - but it's far from perfect.
Any "Auto EQ" system I can imagine would also be far from perfect - and would make so many audible mistakes that it would be more annoying than helpful! It would insist on making the classical track have as much bass as the trance track, and it would sound terrible! But I would love to be proved wrong on this.
ReplayGain is good enough for me. It gives me exactly what I expect.
If an "Auto EQ" system could achieve "near" the results Replay Gain do with the volume… I would be extremely happy!
QUOTE
FWIW Multiband dynamic range compression does seem to "normalise" the EQ of most tracks that go through it - that's why everything on a single radio station usually sounds quite uniform, even though the individual CDs themselves do not. However, that would be "using a sledgehammer to crack a nut" - you'd get the result you want, but you'd change the dynamics of the music as well as the EQ.
"How the music in a radio station sounds uniform?"
That's a question that always makes me wonder...
Is Multiband dynamic range compression simply the answer?
I never liked dynamic range compression, but maybe it's the answer for my problem.
Let me tell you what my final objective is…
I have a bowling center where I constantly play music. I have converted to MP3 about a 1000 CDs to select just the songs that I like. The music's genres are basically ROCK and POP.
When I play these songs I want them to sound uniform, like in a radio station.
Replay Gain fixed the volume difference problem gracefully, but now I have the equalization difference problem, and I can tell you that it's really a problem.
How could I fix it?
QUOTE
What do I do? I have a rough idea of what sounds "right", and thankfully most things do. Where things do sound different, it's not normally a problem. If the mastering is terrible and the EQ is totally wrong, I fix it manually. But it's easier to make things worse than to make things better, and it's easier to fix things to your own "taste" or to compensate for problems in your own audio system than it is to accurately improve the sound.
That's exactly what I'm doing...
I have been using winamp's feature that let me save different equalization for each song. I listen each and every one of them and manually set the equalizer in order to every song sounds uniform.
This process is *FAR* from perfect, and after some time trying to "normalize" the equalization you start to miss judging what should be the correct equalization. At the end of the processes you have to re-touch all the playlist, and it still FAR from perfect. Man... I can tell you that this process is a PAIN IN THE A**
Right now I have about 200+ songs that I have equalized with this method, but I have other 400+ selected songs out of the playlist waiting to be equalized. Every time I think in starting the equalization process with these other songs I found something more "urgent" to do.
I thing you got the idea...
So please, what could you recommend to solve this problem?
Is the “manual method” the best one?
QUOTE
Maybe someone knows of some Auto EQ out there - I remember Pioneer including it on some stereos in the 1980s, so some DSP (at least to do it badly!) must be quite easy.
Anyone?
QUOTE
EDIT: Anyone want to try multi-band ReplayGain by album? I suspect you'd need different target levels in each band - but if you could find some that worked well across a whole genre of music, then you might have a slightly useful tool!
Sure I want!!
Cheers,
muaddib