QUOTE
Originally posted by JS
Yup Trelane, I tried encoding the wavs using the braindead profile and that little gap between the Pain Of Salvation files is gone. (using mppdec)
So, as far as I understand, since the Winamp mpc plugin is based on Andree's old code, I wouldn't be able to get files to play as flawlessly in Winamp as they do with mppdec (unless a new plugin is written based on Frank's new decoder)?
Using Media Jukebox, the playback should be flawless, right? (With your mpc plugin

)
I've tried using MJ, but the size of the program turned me off initially. I just want to use a simple program to play back my audio files, not some huge, elaborate one, which MJ seems to be.
But I may just convert to MJ because of this decoding issue.
Any other advantages MJ has to Winamp?
(I've heard that it takes up CPU and slows the system down even after uninstalling because it adds a ton of junk to the registry... What is that about?)
Thanks Trelane and Frank!
JS
A few words about Media Jukebox.
It is by far the best media player/organizer around. Of course, you can't really compare it with WinAmp. WinAmp is a small extensible player, while MJ is a big all-in-one utility: media player, organizer, burner, ripper (even secure), cover editor, wave editor, media converter, tagger, media server and lots more.
It plays about all audio and video formats you could wish for (about 60 formats supported), had built-in support for replay gain (all audio formats), equaliser, DSP, gapless output, crossfading, etc. etc.
It is also very customizable with skins, smartlists, visualization studio, HTML track info pages, etc.
And one more very important point: it has a very active message board, where the developers also hang out, and they really listen and act promptly to the feedback, feature requests and bug reports of their users. Their involvement with their users is probably one of the main reasons why MJ is so great.
About the only negative point about MJ is the fact that the vast amount of features may somewhat intimidate novice users: there's just so much to explore here.
About the performance: as far as I can tell, CPU usage for playing is about the same as WinAmp (and definately better than e.g. Windows Media Player 7.x). Of course, the visualizations can take quite a bit of CPU cycles, but MJ only uses "idle" CPU cycles for the visualizations. This means that the visualizations will never slow down the system (even though some users might suspect it will, when they look at the CPU usage). And, if some other CPU intensive task is running in the background, the visualizations will simply become more choppy, but the system will be working perfectly otherwise.
About this "registry junk": I'm not aware of this, but of course MJ 8.0 has been in beta for quite some time now, and maybe this was present on earlier beta versions. You should never judge an application by bugs in one of the beta versions.
If you want to check it out, I suggest you download the latest beta version of MJ 8.0 from the forum (Interact -> Talk back). The latest beta versions appear to be pretty solid.
In case you are wondering: no, I don't get paid by J River