QUOTE(SacRat @ Nov 22 2003, 10:01 PM)
Well, Spoon, as far as I remember my first tests of WMA9, only pro mode was really good in terms of quality.
I tried VBR and it was a real crap. On samples checked it was worse (sic!), than CBR.
AgentMi, I think your choice could be WMA9 2 pass at 80 or 96K. It's morel-less clear from WMAs ordinary artifacts. At least, not annoying.
By the way, have you already fixed a bug in dBpowerAMP with big fonts?
If so, I might even consider continue using its encoder again

maybe, it's possible to rip MS installer somehow, but DB poweramp seems to be a nice solution anyway (I used to use it for encoding WMA9)
Heh... thats what I use SacRat 2-pass VBR at 96kbps. It is clear of any annoying WMA artifacting, but on occasion it does trip up though but you really need to be "in the zone" to hear it while on your portable (like sitting in you room listening to music

).
I managed to find a WMA converter that uses WMA9 its available at
LiteXMedia but be forewarned the installer for Advanced WMA Workshop overwrites your ASPI files with older versions that will render EAC unusable, that is due to the program having its own ripping engine. Just make a note of your ASPI drivers and just copy them and then copy them back when installation is done. They also have a program that attaches to the right click menu so all you need to do is right click the source and it will encode with the options of your choice.
lexor: Can't install that I don't run Windows XP