Here's a little question I've been meaning to ask.

What is to video as fb2k/winamp is to audio?
getID3()
Nov 24 2003, 16:48
I agree wit CiTay. It must be Media Player Classic. Though it seem even more "simpler" than Foobar. Only one file and no installation. And features are great.
kl33per
Nov 24 2003, 18:01
Another vote here for Media Player Classic.
I use Winamp and Media Player Classic, depending on my mood.
I'd use MPC more exclusively, but it doesn't seem to be able to take and hold a file association at all.
m0rbidini
Nov 24 2003, 23:35
Media Player Classic here too. Very configurable, all the features I want, rapid development, lightweighted and freeware.
cya
PlaStiK
Nov 24 2003, 23:36
I've been using Zoom Player for the last 3 years, mostly because of the...well...zoom function

Very handy for those 16:9 movies that look like a tiny strip on my TV. I think Media Player Classic does more things out of the box, but since I've installed al the necessary plugins a long time ago I don't feel the need to change to anything other than Zoom Player. (and the newest skin looks great IMHO)
I just tried MPC and it does the job great. Canar is right though, the weak file assocation can be a bit annoying.
Continuum
Nov 25 2003, 06:19
I love
Sasami2k. It's not developed any longer, but it has some nice extra filters and it is the best player for mouse users.
Media Player Classic here too, even though it doesn't matter too much to me, since they all utilize DirectShow, even though MPC gives you more control about the filters used and has its own build in ones.
since iam working quite a lot with pal video , which isnt 1:1 i need a player that can manually override the AR. (sasami and zoomplayer are curently installed)
sasami problems:
-doesnt recognize the nonstandard display iam using (it is 15:10), so the positioner is moving outside of the tracks...
-i cant find an option to overlay time.
zoom player problem:
-featureitis
will try mpc.
QUOTE(PlaStiK @ Nov 25 2003, 06:36 AM)
I've been using Zoom Player for the last 3 years, mostly because of the...well...zoom function
Check Options -> Keys in MPC. You can control zooming with the Numpad keys. You can zoom in or out, width and height seperately and also reset it again, all with the buttons 1 through 9.
Oge_user
Nov 26 2003, 13:06
Media Player Classic (I use Zoom Player and BsPlayer too)
mobius
Nov 26 2003, 13:32
I've tried all mentioned here except crystal, which I will shortly. I keep going back to MV2 player.
http://mv2.czweb.org/Very nice keyboard/mouse controls. Also, the overlay mode works best with my nvidia TV out. Windowed video displays full screen on the TV. I'll say it again: Nice.
ChristianHJW
Nov 26 2003, 16:46
The Core Media Player pre-RC5

!
nyarlathotep
Nov 26 2003, 17:12
Another vote here for Media Player Classic. Simple et efficient with great features. It can even play DVDs. And it's often updated. Moreover, Gabest can be easily found at Doom9.
Althalus
Dec 1 2003, 10:40
Media Player Classic
superdumprob
Dec 2 2003, 18:23
Two MPCs, both great and I use both...
How is Media Player Classic for just playing audio? Would I be better off with Winamp or fb2k?
kl33per
Dec 3 2003, 01:16
Whilst Media Player Classic can play many audio types (not as many as foobar, I believe it only plays those with direct show filters or with any built in filters it has), it has no playlist. Therefore you would be better to use foobar2000/Winamp to play music.
IIRC MPC has a playlist, it just isn't shown by default (I'm not at home right now so I cannot check).
cd-rw.org
Dec 3 2003, 07:47
I vote for Zoom Player. It has served me well for years.
With MPC I have experienced couple of weird things, but I have not tried the recent versions.'
And don't forget to kick the DivX codec the f*ck out of your computer, and replace it with FFDSHOW.
Latexxx
Dec 3 2003, 10:06
I use mpc. Tcmp is too complicated to use and the dvd features cost money. Tcmp also looks too much like Winamp. Winamp might be a good audio player but the interface isn't ideal for video and I'm a foobar2000 zealot. Mpc is easy and fast. My main reason for choosing mpc is attached.
I've been using MPC for the most part since reading this thread, but I must say that crystalplayer (if you can get over the "cute" interface) is a nice package.
QUOTE(Latexxx @ Dec 3 2003, 11:06 AM)
My main reason for choosing mpc is attached.
I don't understand. Is it because it looks similar?
Edit: Anyone try MV2 player? If you do so press "o" for some stats.
kl33per
Dec 3 2003, 22:05
QUOTE(Tri @ Dec 3 2003, 10:33 PM)
IIRC MPC has a playlist, it just isn't shown by default (I'm not at home right now so I cannot check).
Quite right, it does have a playlist. Thanks, I've never noticed that before.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.