QUOTE(Pio2001 @ Dec 23 2003, 05:29 PM)
QUOTE(tigre @ Dec 23 2003, 04:02 PM)
- lame (especially alt-presets) is tuned for 44.1kHz and performs audibly worse on some samples at 48kHz (but not better anywhere IIRC).
Can you find a link ? I know that resampling to 48 kHz is not recommended, but I don't remember about tests showing problems.
Here I found:
QUOTE(tigre @ May 6 2003, 02:23 PM)
<snip> (DVD 48kHz PCM track -> mp3). <snip> I found two samples in the track where I could successfully ABX 48kHz lame 3.90.2 aps vs. Original but not 44.1kHz lame 3.90.2 aps (downsampled with SSRC before encoding, 24bit output file). Unfortunately I don't have the original anymore, so I can't provide samples. The difference was some slight ringing/chirping added. In spectral view some "dropouts" (black "holes") at ~ 15kHz were visible at these positions (I did this after ABXing

).
I don't know anymore which songs/positions I ABXed. (It was from
this DVD, a classical/world music live concert.)
Now I've done a new test using
Desmond_1 sample (from 24/96 vs CD quality sample suite):
Original
vs.Original, converted to 44.1kHz/24bit with fb2k resampler (slow) + diskwriter, encoded with lame 3.90.3 --alt-preset standard
andOriginal, converted to 48kHz/24bit with fb2k resampler (slow) + diskwriter, encoded with lame 3.90.3 --alt-preset standard
Focussing on 1-4s I was able to ABX successfully [Original vs. 48kHz mp3] and [44.1 mp3 vs. 48kHz mp3] but not [Original vs. 44.1kHz mp3]. (The difference I heard was fluttering/bumping of the cymbals/hihats).
To find other similar samples, using music with lots of high pitched, noise-like content should be promising (e.g. live recordings, metal with distorted guitars + cymbals).