Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Which compile to use?
Hydrogenaudio Forums > Lossy Audio Compression > MP3 > MP3 - Tech
Garathor
I use Lame 3.90.3. I understand there are several compiles, does it matter which one i use? If it does, which compile should i use?
john33
Unless they've been copied and posted elsewhere, they're only available from Rarewares. Use one of those. wink.gif
Garathor
Until now i have been using another compile of 3.90.3.

MD5 sums:
lame.exe: 9119aa70c1937c32497f4763864ec2c0
lame_enc.dll: 215faec63d7be309034b1374a5b46dd2

Have this affected my mp3s in a bad way? Should i re-encode them? Would be a lot of work....
john33
QUOTE(Garathor @ Feb 15 2004, 09:22 AM)
Until now i have been using another compile of 3.90.3.

MD5 sums:
lame.exe: 9119aa70c1937c32497f4763864ec2c0
lame_enc.dll: 215faec63d7be309034b1374a5b46dd2

Have this affected my mp3s in a bad way? Should i re-encode them? Would be a lot of work....

I would seriously doubt whether there is any distinguishable difference, certainly not to require re-encoding. I'm sure they're fine. wink.gif
mantra
hi
i now use for my every program john33's lame
it works perfeclty with my programs , WAVELAB4 TOOOO!!!!!!!
mantra
by the way now compile do exist?

can somebody post some links?

i know john33's lame that works much better then Dmitry Kutsanov 's comile!
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.