Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: In between Lame and Raw PCM
Hydrogenaudio Forums > Lossless Audio Compression > Lossless / Other Codecs
windmiller
I am trying really hard to pick a format to rip 100+ CD's with. They will primarily be played on a HTPC player in a small Home Theatre. I encoded samples of RAW PCM, LAME at Alt standard, VBR 2-5, Big Endian and Little Endian.

Raw PCM, Little Endian, etc sounds so good but because space issues I need something that will produce smaller files. I was thinking something between LAME and RAW in quality and size. Any ideas would be much appreciated.






CDex 1.51
NEC1300a
westgroveg
You will save yourself a lot of time by just using EAC as your ripper, it can be set-up to get info from freedb, rip, encode, can log extraction & encode info which is a kind of authenticity of the quality.
dreamliner77
Look into a lossless codec. Flac and Monkey's audio are probably two of the most used. WavPack is gaining popularity...
ScorLibran
QUOTE (windmiller @ Mar 5 2004, 11:52 PM)
I am trying really hard to pick a format to rip 100+ CD's with. They will primarily be played on a HTPC player in a small Home Theatre. I encoded samples of RAW PCM, LAME at Alt standard, VBR 2-5, Big Endian and Little Endian.

Raw PCM, Little Endian, etc sounds so good but because space issues I need something that will produce smaller files. I was thinking something between LAME and RAW in quality and size. Any ideas would be much appreciated.

How much hard drive space do you have?

Just as rough estimates, 100 CDs will take...

In a compressed lossless format, maximum setting (FLAC/Monkey's/WavPack Lossless) : 35 GB
Using lossy compression at 320kbps (LAME, MPC, Ogg Vorbis, AAC) : 13.5 GB
Using lossy compression at 192kbps (LAME, MPC, Ogg Vorbis, AAC) : 8 GB

Planning for future expansion (and also considering how far over 100 CDs you have), if your HD space is 40 GB or less, I'd recommend a mid-to-high bitrate lossy codec. The rates shown provide a high level of confidence for perceptual transparency. If you have more than this much space, then lossless, as dreamliner recommends, would be a good consideration.
windmiller
Thanks alot for the replies, while I am not new to encoding I am really out of date as too what is avalible. nHard drive space is not a limitation, currently have 80GB and a 20Gb but with HD's as cheap as they are I can increase HD space.

The concern is quality and to a certain extent compatiblity. My HTPC uses WMP 9 and I do like to play music on a Ipaq. SO I dont want to encode and then have to worry about what player I use. Are the many ways you can encode in .wav supported by most players these days??

PS I am looking into EAC today!! Thanks,
westgroveg
You may want to try OptimFROG DualStream

QUOTE
OptimFROG DualStream is aimed at filling the big gap between perceptual coding and lossless coding. The goal is to offer real transparent audio coding (not only perceptually transparent) at half or less the bitrate generally used by lossless coding, and also to permit progressive consistent increase of the quality level, until lossless coding is reached.


Or WavPack Hybrid

QUOTE
WavPack also incorporates a unique "hybrid" mode that provides all the advantages of lossless compression with an additional bonus. Instead of creating a single file, this mode creates both a relatively small, high-quality lossy file that can be used all by itself, and a "correction" file that (when combined with the lossy file) provides full lossless restoration. For some users this means never having to choose between lossless and lossy compression!
windmiller
I have been encoding in Flac, WavePAck and LAME in EAC. Great program...the only thing I cant figure out is how to choose a higher bitrate in VBR in LAME, 192 was the highest.

Any crucial setting when using Flac or WavPack?
westgroveg
QUOTE
...the only thing I cant figure out is how to choose a higher bit rate in VBR in LAME, 192 was the highest.

User Defined Encoder
Commandline options: --alt-preset standard %s %d

QUOTE
Any crucial setting when using Flac or WavPack?

There have been some tests done by Den with Wavpack lossy here at HA which you can find by using the search function. Flac only supports lossless encoding & levels higher than 5 show very small improvements & encoding time is greatly increased so I would stick with the default value of 5.
windmiller
Before I encode the CD in FLAC it shows the amount of compression to the right of the original compression but when I am done encoding there doesnt seem to be any compression. It still shows the oroginal size when I check the file??

Any idea what I a m doing worng? I have checked my settings pretty well...
tigre
How do you check it? My favourite way to check things like this (compression ratio/bitrate) is playing back the file in foobar2000 and watch the bitrate that is displayed (should be lower than 1411kbps for compressed audio from CD wink.gif ).
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2009 Invision Power Services, Inc.