High Fidelity
Mar 17 2004, 15:03
I'd simply like to know the statistical distribution for the usage of LAME settings.
If you use "-Y", "--lowpass" or "--scale" with one of the above, just vote for the base setting like:
--alt-preset standard -Y -> --alt-preset standard
for other additional settings, that influence the preset tuning please choose:
--noneoftheaboveIbuildmyowncommandline
If you decided to go with own settings, please tell us how your special command line looks like . . .
dreamliner77
Mar 17 2004, 16:47
--aps, but that is only for the rare times i use mp3. I've moved on to mpc...
AndyMutz
Mar 17 2004, 16:52
QUOTE(dreamliner77 @ Mar 17 2004, 02:47 PM)
--aps, but that is only for the rare times i use mp3. I've moved on to mpc...
same here.
-andy-
upNorth
Mar 17 2004, 16:54
QUOTE(AndyMutz @ Mar 18 2004, 12:52 AM)
QUOTE(dreamliner77 @ Mar 17 2004, 02:47 PM)
--aps, but that is only for the rare times i use mp3. I've moved on to mpc...
same here.
-andy-
and here
SometimesWarrior
Mar 17 2004, 16:59
--apfs -Y, for transcoding from MPC to my portable player.
High Fidelity
Mar 17 2004, 17:01
I moved to flac, but still convert to mp3 for car and portable use.
shadowking
Mar 17 2004, 17:42
MPC to Preset fast medium for portable. Otherwise I'd use 3.90.3 APFS / 3.96 APS
kasztan
Mar 17 2004, 18:45
--aps but only in my dvdrip's
normally i use mpc
The_Cisco_Kid
Mar 17 2004, 21:49
for those exceedingly rare MP3 that I create for friends it is --alt preset standard with 3.90.3 and the Foobar diskwriter
For 99% of my lossy files now it is MP4, usually in the 40-50 kbps range for my website or 'VBR 6' for cds or anything not website related. Was using MPC and Wavpack briefly.
caiman
Mar 18 2004, 01:17
using preset 102, because i got a tiny flash player (jamaba u100). this is my compromise. iīm using it only on the streets, while driving my bicycle or in the underground, so the little artifacts donīt bother me mucho.
and at this bitrate (only with 3.90.3 i think) lame resamples to 32k so theres less annoying artifacts. tried that with 3.95 and 3.96 and itīs a mess because of HF content an there comes the artifacts...
Artemis3
Mar 18 2004, 15:01
QUOTE(upNorth @ Mar 17 2004, 06:54 PM)
QUOTE(AndyMutz @ Mar 18 2004, 12:52 AM)
QUOTE(dreamliner77 @ Mar 17 2004, 02:47 PM)
--aps, but that is only for the rare times i use mp3. I've moved on to mpc...
same here.
-andy-
and here

same...
YinYang
Mar 18 2004, 15:28
When not using Ogg or MPC I have a tendency to veer towards -apm for general listening. I find that the bitrate for -aps is overkill, unless we're talking archiving.
music_man_mpc
Mar 18 2004, 15:59
QUOTE(Artemis3 @ Mar 18 2004, 01:01 PM)
QUOTE(upNorth @ Mar 17 2004, 06:54 PM)
QUOTE(AndyMutz @ Mar 18 2004, 12:52 AM)
QUOTE(dreamliner77 @ Mar 17 2004, 02:47 PM)
--aps, but that is only for the rare times i use mp3. I've moved on to mpc...
same here.
-andy-
and here

same...
Wow it seems like I'm part of a crowd . . . finally accepted

.
On a side note would the people who voted "--noneoftheaboveIbuildmyowncommandline" please reveal yourselves, your settings and your justification. I am very interested as to why you would use other settings.
edit: typo
sony666
Mar 18 2004, 16:13
depends on my mood
sometimes it's "wow Dibrom looks pretty cool and the VBR bitrate distribution graphs are neat hi-tech", then the other day "ah scrap it, the bit reserviour will do it's job just fine and a CBR file never causes any trouble anywhere"
so I end up 50/50 with ap-s and ap cbr 192 files in my database. not that it would make any difference in the end (to me)
sramov
Mar 19 2004, 03:41
When I use MP3 (for friends), I use --alt-preset standard with either 3.90.3 or latest stable.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.