Doesn't the noise problem occur in GT3? If GT3 is better, it has the possibility of the problem of pre-echo (or block switching).
Simultaneously, I am interested in the sample.

I didn't compared it with GT3 (or even with CVS encoder - only with mpc ).
I'll probably investigate further, with the latest encoder (I used the pre-beta2).

For uploading, it's possible, but not before the next week. Sorry... (I must also find again this sample, or similar ones).

I've done some testings on the samples cause typical Vorbis' artifacts as guruboolez already mentioned.

Brahms3: I prefer aoTuVb2.
Castanets: I prefer GT3b2.

OK, somebody please point me to the EXACT encoder I should be using for my test, so that we avoid last-minute mistakes.

Thank-you.

Thanks.


I am also the same opinion as you.


Please use "aoTuV beta2 Win32 OggEnc-locale fix" of aoTuV test page. This is an equivalent for a reference binary.

Thank-you very much.

I've found my noisy sample, and uploaded here:
http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index....ndpost&p=208504

@guruboolez

I checked the sample by which you were uploaded.
In order to correct this difference, it is likely to take time considerably. Probably, many experiments are needed, also considering balance with other samples.

If an experiment succeeds, it may be improved by the future version.

Encoding files now, using precisely this version:
http://www.geocities.jp/aoyoume/aotuv/test...c_aotuv_b2m.zip

If it's wrong, scream now before it is too late :B

No problem.

Guys, how about compiling an aoTuvb2 plugin for Adobe Audition (Cool Edit Pro)?