QUOTE
I have found that the iPod badly distorts 320 kbps mp3. Most noticeable with classical music, such as piano concerts and opera.
The distortion is so bad on certain sequences that it is unbelievable. I can best describe it as wow and flutter.
In this test I have used EAC to extract a WAV file. Then proceded by converting the WAV file into mp3 320 kbps.
I have verified this problem on a 3G 40GB iPod. Song: from Daphnis et Chloe, Suite No. 2, Lever du Jour, composed by Maurice Ravel, perf. by Cleveland Orch., BMG c. 1991.
Using EAC and LAME 3.90.3 I ripped (encoded) the song to WAV, APS (alt-preset standard), and API (alt-preset insane aka 320 kbps CBR). The beginning of the song is very quiet, with rapid flutes and bowed bass. The APS sounds quite similar to the WAV. The API (320 kbps) is extremely warbly/fluttery. This is not a subtle effect, it is quite unlistenable. Further into the track, when more of the orchestra is present and the volume is greater, the effect is not audible. The fluttering is audible both through the internal iPod amplifier and through the line out -> Yamaha Natural Sound Amp -> Sony MDR-7506 heaphones.
I've been trying to figure out the best setting/codec to use for my newly acquired iPod. I started out testing different iTunes settings and decided on iTunes VBR min. 224. During further listening I noticed skips in the audio, and found the highest freqencies to be unconvincing. I researched EAC and LAME. After 3 further grueling listening tests I settled for APS (alt-preset standard) and began to encode my collection. Upon further listening I wasn't happy with the high frequencies, esp. on cymbals. The way I hear it 14k-16k sounds really good, but uncompressed is more convincing in the upper reaches.
It's subtle, but as a practicing recording engineer I've often heard the difference between live, 16-24 track 2" tape, and 16-24 bit mastering formats. That's why I'm desperate to find the most transparent format possible for my iPod short of lossless, which would only allow me to store 80-90 albums. I have 250 and would like to have room to grow. I realize I haven't included AAC in my listening tests (my only other option for a compressed codec with the iPod - I may be forced to try it).
I decided to do another listening test with a larger variety of source material, all with very high production quality. I found the APS to sound pretty good, but the API (320 kbps) just sounded more convincing. It was in the "hard to put my finger on it but less annoying" category. The high freqs in some material with APS encoding can annoy me, and while the highest freqs in API aren't aren't totally comparable to CD quality (44.1khz PCM) it's doesn't tend to annoy me. However, my tests were mostly with limited dynamic range material like rock or highly processed music (read analog compressed and effected). The sound quality on classical music at low volume levels was awful and unlistenable.
I would estimate that the level of the problematic music was approx -20 to -16 dbFS. Higher levels seemed to mask the problem. As we know, the whole field of audio compression is based on masking of audio effects. An encoder that competes poorly at low bitrates may shine at highter bitrates, or as I've experience in this case, vice versa. As a practical matter I'm considering encoding my 'loud' type music with API, and high-dynamic range material with APS for use on my iPod.
I am surprised not to see more about this issue with the iPod. Apple is obviously not going to comment on this. The only mention of this issue I can find is on Hydrogen Audio. Are more people noticing this?
I would love to hear feedback on this issue.
Some questions: 1. Do you have problems with APS (alt-preset standard)? 2. Do you have warble problems with API (alt-preset insane aka 320 kbps) on low volume music? 3. What have you come up with as a practical approach for use on the iPod (3G)?
Peregrine Maese