Yaztromo
Apr 29 2004, 11:50
Available here:
http://www.monkeysaudio.com/download.htmlVersion 3.99 (April 29, 2004)
1. Changed: Decoding engine better at handling corrupt streams / loss of internet connection while playing.
2. Changed: Simplified assembly code building for 3rd party developers.
3. NEW: Improved entropy coder for increased compression.
4. Changed: Removed RKAU support. (since it is no longer commonly used)
guruboolez
Apr 29 2004, 12:16
Strange. I've deleted the previous version af Monkey, installed the 3.99F one, and the encoder (MAC.exe) is still the 3.98 beta one (date= 30/05/2003). The GUI is the 3.99 version, but the encoder isn't.
Could someone confirm this?
harashin
Apr 29 2004, 12:19
QUOTE(guruboolez @ Apr 30 2004, 03:16 AM)
Strange. I've deleted the previous version af Monkey, installed the 3.99F one, and the encoder (MAC.exe) is still the 3.98 beta one (date= 30/05/2003). The GUI is the 3.99 version, but the encoder isn't.
Could someone confirm this?
It's shown as 3.98 here, too.
CODE
D:\programs\Monkey's Audio>mac
--- Monkey's Audio Console Front End (v 3.98) (c) Matthew T. Ashland ---
Proper Usage: [EXE] [Input File] [Output File] [Mode]
Edit:shown as 3.97
Yaztromo
Apr 29 2004, 12:26
I can confirm that my installation of 3.99 is has 3.98 of MAC.exe.
I have just created an ape file with the GUI in insane mode. Foobar 0.7.7b will not play this "ape: undefined". Does foobar not play 3.98 files, or are these 3.99 files?
guruboolez
Apr 29 2004, 12:42
I could confirm this.
Encoded with the CLI component of foobar2000, the ape files are OK, shown as 3.98 in metadata.
But encoded through the new GUI, the files are unplayable with fb2k 0.81, but are labeled 3.99.
Weird...
rjamorim
Apr 29 2004, 12:47
http://www.monkeysaudio.com/cgi-bin/YaBB/Y...&num=1083260164QUOTE(monkey)
MAC.exe didn't get updated. I'll do that within a few days.
Like I said -- it's been a while and I'm rusty

harashin
Apr 29 2004, 12:50
I noticed MACDll.dll in system32 is updated to 3.99 while its frontend isn't.
Edit: I meant its console frontend.
philaphonic
Apr 29 2004, 12:53
i surely enjoy .flac.
rjamorim
Apr 29 2004, 12:56
QUOTE(philaphonic @ Apr 29 2004, 03:53 PM)
i surely enjoy .flac.
What a wonderful insight into your personal preferences! THANK-YOU!
QUOTE(philaphonic @ Apr 29 2004, 07:53 PM)
i surely enjoy .flac.
I like choclate.
anyway, let's hope the updated release will be up and about soon.
edit: lol, Roberto beat me to it ;-)
p0wder
Apr 29 2004, 13:17
Is Monkey's Audio open source now? I saw this on the homepage.
QUOTE
Freely available source code, simple SDK and non-restrictive licensing - other developers can easily use Monkey's Audio in their own programs -- and there are no evil restrictive licensing agreements
rjamorim
Apr 29 2004, 13:19
QUOTE(p0wder @ Apr 29 2004, 04:17 PM)
Is Monkey's Audio open source now?
It's been for more than two years
p0wder
Apr 29 2004, 13:25
QUOTE(rjamorim @ Apr 29 2004, 11:19 AM)
QUOTE(p0wder @ Apr 29 2004, 04:17 PM)
Is Monkey's Audio open source now?
It's been for more than two years
Haha I was afraid of that. My bad.
Yaztromo
Apr 29 2004, 13:43
Wow that was fast Case, thanks.
Decoder seems to work fine on 3.99 files here. On insane files there is a long pause before playback starts, but I'm attributing that to the nature of insane apes.
DAvenger
Apr 29 2004, 13:49
We'll be updating the DirectShow filter shortly
Thanks Case! Good to have you back.
QUOTE(rjamorim @ Apr 29 2004, 04:56 PM)
QUOTE(philaphonic @ Apr 29 2004, 03:53 PM)
i surely enjoy .flac.
What a wonderful insight into your personal preferences! THANK-YOU!
@rjamorim: Zero tolerance style.
Hehehehehehehe
How about encoding time compared to others lossless codecs?
rjamorim
Apr 29 2004, 14:13
QUOTE(SoNiX @ Apr 29 2004, 05:06 PM)
@rjamorim: Zero tolerance style.
He asked for it :B
QUOTE
How about encoding time compared to others lossless codecs?
Let's wait until Hans Heijden or Speek update their comparisions.
QUOTE(SoNiX @ Apr 29 2004, 09:06 PM)
How about encoding time compared to others lossless codecs?
http://flac.sourceforge.net/comparison.htmlhttp://www.monkeysaudio.com/comparison.html (waaay outdated)
WaldoMonster
Apr 29 2004, 14:20
He Case,
Nice to see you back

And thanks for the files.
rjamorim
Apr 29 2004, 14:20
QUOTE(Digga @ Apr 29 2004, 05:16 PM)
Flac isn't up-to-date either.
As far as I can see, so far no comparision is featuring Monkey's Audio 3.99.
QUOTE(rjamorim @ Apr 29 2004, 09:20 PM)
Flac isn't up-to-date either.
As far as I can see, so far no comparision is featuring Monkey's Audio 3.99
I know, but the flac page is at least more up to date than ape's... missed Speeks comparison though.
I thought SoNiX's question was more of a general nature, and not so much pointed at the brand new release...
Yaztromo
Apr 29 2004, 14:42
Just a quick test of 3.99. Sorry, I didn't have time to compare to another encoder (e.g. FLAC)
System
------
Athlon XP 2400 at 2055mhz, 137mhz FSB (274mhz)
768mb PC2100 RAM
80Gb Barracuda IV Ultra DMA mode 5
Windows XP
Monkeys Audio GUI 3.99.
Encoding results
----------------
Album: AC/DC - If You Want Blood You've Got It (Metal)
Original WAV's: 534.9mb
Insane - 380.42mb, 7:55 encode time, 6:40 decode time
Extra High - 381.20mb, 2:19 encode time, 2:31 decode time
High - 382.42mb, 1:20 encode time, 1:33 decode time
Normal - 383.03mb, 1:12 encode time, 1:26 decode time
Fast - 386.54mb, 0:55 encode time, 1:08 decode time
Note: Insane files won't play gaplessly with Foobar2000. There are long pauses before the start of each track.
HansHeijden
Apr 29 2004, 14:45
Yes things are beginning to pile up, things to update (am I missing anything?):
Monkey's: 3.97 -> 3.99
OptimFROG: 4.506 -> 4.509
Shorten: 3.5.1 -> 3.5.2 (bugfix only)
RAR: 3.11 -> 3.30 (dunno if improved)
TTA: 2.0 -> 3.0
Apple lossless
RealAudio lossless
WavPack 4.0 stable would be nice too, say, tomorrow?
Give me a few days, meanwhile Speek is always faster with updating!
Edit: Thanks Yaztromo, insane mode appears similar to 3.98 alpha 1 results, see
here.
guruboolez
Apr 29 2004, 14:57
I just have some lossless albums on my notebooks, encoded with 3.98 at -c2000 (= normal). A fresh encoding with 3.99F shows
slight improvements in bitrate. Here are the results for three discs :
CODE
3.98 : 293 Mo (308 005 231 octets)
3.99 : 292 Mo (306 521 639 octets)
3.98 : 222 Mo (233 703 319 octets)
3.99 : 221 Mo (232 513 063 octets)
3.98 : 214 Mo (224 505 884 octets)
3.99 : 213 Mo (224 184 296 octets)
Note that all these discs are classical music (Vivaldi & Haydn Concertos and contempory chamber music for the last one), and average bitrate is generally more friendly than with other kind of music (~41% on average - tested on > 300 CD).
Seems to be worth to upgrade, though I didn't test encoding and decoding speed.
WaldoMonster
Apr 29 2004, 15:06
I have tested 7 files with maximum compression.
1: 10 CC - The wall street shuffle.wav
2: 10,000 Maniacs - Noahs dove.wav
3: 3 Doors down - When I'm gone.wav
4: Abba - Dancing queen.wav
5: Air - Cherry blossom girl.wav
6: Bob Marley - Is this love.wav
7: DJ Food - Strange taste.wav
CODE
APE 3.97 APE 3.99
WAV time Kbit/s time Kbit/s
------------------------------------------------
1 0:20 795 0:21 789
2 0:23 919 0:24 914
3 0:22 921 0:24 916
4 0:20 937 0:21 932
5 0:19 909 0:21 901
6 0:20 855 0:23 855
7 0:09 754 0:10 749
------------------------------------------------
100% 62.50% 62.13%
rjamorim
Apr 29 2004, 15:09
QUOTE(HansHeijden @ Apr 29 2004, 05:45 PM)
WavPack 4.0 stable would be nice too, say, tomorrow?
Or maybe a Release Candidate the day after tomorrow..
Heh, I gave the new version a quick test on ~25 random tunes:
CODE
3.97 -extra high 57.81% - 481.1s to decode
3.99 -extra high 57.43% - 540.9s to decode
3.99 -insane 57.42% . . . 1 week to decode
So that's about 6mb saved for each gb of ape's by moving to the new extra high, but is that worth the 12% higher decode time?
It'd be interesting to know what -insane does at the moment. I know it's experimental still, but it saved about 300kb in a gig of waves and adds 3s to seek times
Has anybody else tried playing 3.97 files with the 3.99 Winamp plugin? I get a noticable skip between tracks which is fixed by reinstalling 3.97 and it's version of the Winamp plugin..
Just to clarify, this is playing 3.97 -extra high files, not the new insane files which suffer megalag.. hmmz..
Hyperion
Apr 29 2004, 17:03
p0wder
Apr 29 2004, 17:44
I frequently get checksum errors when seeking quickly through ape files at normal compression and above. Fast compression doesn't seem to have this problem though.
QUOTE
ERROR (foo_ape) : invalid checksum
Is this a known problem?
jtclipper
Apr 30 2004, 03:20
Still no pipe support for mac.exe, pitty.
edit:
oh one more thing, why is the decoding so terribly slow ?
QUOTE(Yaztromo @ Apr 29 2004, 09:50 AM)
Available here:
http://www.monkeysaudio.com/download.htmlVersion 3.99 (April 29, 2004)
1. Changed: Decoding engine better at handling corrupt streams / loss of internet connection while playing.
2. Changed: Simplified assembly code building for 3rd party developers.
3. NEW: Improved entropy coder for increased compression.
4. Changed: Removed RKAU support. (since it is no longer commonly used)
hmm.... i coundn't get it work, it just says "i/o error" everytime i try to start the compression...
bawjaws
May 1 2004, 06:26
QUOTE(p0wder @ Apr 29 2004, 11:17 AM)
Is Monkey's Audio open source now? I saw this on the homepage.
QUOTE
Freely available source code, simple SDK and non-restrictive licensing - other developers can easily use Monkey's Audio in their own programs -- and there are no evil restrictive licensing agreements
Short answer: no
The following was moved to off-topic the last time this came up:
http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index....=17&t=17485&st=
eagleray
May 1 2004, 08:11
Offhand comments:
It seems a bit strange to call this a point release (point .02 actually) when the new encoder breaks the old decoder.
Thank you Case for those quick foobar updates. Perhaps you have not completely lost interest, or you just like Monkey's a bunch.
It would be nice if the mac dll could be obtained without downloading and installing the entire 3 mb package.
rjamorim
May 1 2004, 09:58
QUOTE(bawjaws @ May 1 2004, 09:26 AM)
Short answer: no
The following was moved to off-topic the last time this came up:
http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index....=17&t=17485&st= I disagree. And I agree with Garf's point on this subject. It IS open source, considering the sources are... open!
HansHeijden
May 1 2004, 10:06
Update on my website, including Monkey's 3.99, see the www link below.
Using Monkey's interface for now, because the 3.99 mac.exe is still missing.
Apple and Real lossless still to do.
Please comment on missing/broken links, errors, or whatever I may have overlooked!
QUOTE(HansHeijden @ May 1 2004, 05:06 PM)
Update on my website, including Monkey's 3.99, see the www link below.
for all those who don't see a link below

...
look
here.comments:
you might want to define what the %-values on the y-axis stand for (though it's pretty obious, but still...)
HansHeijden
May 1 2004, 15:05
Done, added that X/Y-axis talk on the main page. Not in the graphs, don't want to waste space over there!
Also Apple lossless has just been added, and indeed its compression is close to FLAC.
I ditched BONK for that, but under "ALL (old)" the previous graphs are kept for comparison.
Edit: BTW, yet again there is a link below

But seriously, is there a chance Digga can't see the PM/email/www buttons? Mods?
QUOTE(HansHeijden @ May 1 2004, 10:05 PM)
Edit: BTW, yet again there is a link below

But seriously, is there a chance Digga can't see the PM/email/www buttons? Mods?
hrm. it seems that a certain person... *someone in the audiece asks: 'is it Digga?', but is booed down immediately by the crowd* ...has indeed the ability to NOT see special types of buttons, which are deeply hidden in the board structure...
I'm just realy used to hyperlinks and didn't look at these little buttons... my bad.
edit: typos
madoka@ex-sounds
May 1 2004, 21:27
my result
original:
49,575,980 bytes (100 %)
2,116 kbps
3.99 extra high:
31,090,936 bytes (62.713 %)
1,328 kbps
comp. time (about): 10.5 sec.
3.99 insaine:
31,931,644 bytes (64.409 %)
1,363 kbps
comp. time (about): 35 sec.
why dose "insane" make bigger file than "extra high" ?
rjamorim
May 1 2004, 21:55
QUOTE(madoka@ex-sounds @ May 2 2004, 12:27 AM)
why dose "insane" make bigger file than "extra high" ?
Please keep in mind insane is an experimental mode.
madoka@ex-sounds
May 1 2004, 22:25
QUOTE
Please keep in mind insane is an experimental mode.
OK. i'll keep in mind. thanks.
add result at same sample (TOM WAITS in the neiborhood).
QUOTE
3.99 extra high:
31,090,936 bytes (62.713 %)
1,328 kbps
comp. time (about): 10.5 sec.
3.98 extra high:
31,168,364 bytes (62.869 %)
1,331 kbps
comp. time (about): 10.1 sec.
in this sample, 3.98 faster than 3.99, but 3.99 smaller than 3.98.
i wll use new 3.99 CUI version. many thanks for Case.
Yaztromo
May 2 2004, 02:13
Matt has updated 3.99
QUOTE
Monkey's Audio 3.99 Update 1
Just updated the MAC 3.99 download.
It should have the new MAC.exe and also a MAC.dll and MAC.exe that work under Win9x. (keep in mind that MAC now requires Unicows.dll to be in the system directory on Win9x machines)
If other components don't work properly on Win9x, please let me know.
Thanks everyone.
Sebastian Mares
May 2 2004, 04:20
Can anyone tell me how to transcode my 3.97 files to 3.99 while preserving the tags?
kjoonlee
May 2 2004, 04:28
You can use foobar2000's foo_ape together with foo_monkey.
Sebastian Mares
May 2 2004, 07:59
Is it OK that the foobar2000 plugin produces slightly different files than the current 3.99 encoder? They both decode to the same WAV, though.
Edit: Sorry, the WAV files are not the same. I will compress a WAV with Monkey's Audio and decode it back. Anyway, as I said, when comparing the decoded WAVs from 3.97 with the ones from 3.99, they do not match.
QUOTE(Sebastian Mares @ May 2 2004, 03:59 PM)
Is it OK that the foobar2000 plugin produces slightly different files than the current 3.99 encoder? They both decode to the same WAV, though.
Tags?
kjoonlee
May 2 2004, 08:18
QUOTE(Sebastian Mares @ May 2 2004, 10:59 PM)
Edit: Sorry, the WAV files are not the same. I will compress a WAV with Monkey's Audio and decode it back. Anyway, as I said, when comparing the decoded WAVs from 3.97 with the ones from 3.99, they do not match.
What does foobar2000's "bit compare" tell you?
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.