Hi all.
I'm new to this forum and I'm also new to Lame. Until now I have only encoded music for casual PC listening. I have been using AudioCatalys for this.

I really like good quality music and I want it in my HiFi at home (not in the PC). I'm going to try the following for this:
- EAC
- Lame encoder (probably with RazorLame)
- Netgear MP101GE (MP3 player with TP and signal out)

If this gives good quality I'll be really happy. This way I can store all my music on my server and play it on my HiFi.


But since I'm quite new to this I have some questions:

Does MP3 perform enough for HiFi? Anywhere I can read more about this?

Is it encoding or decoding that is most important to do really well? The encoding is well taken care of with Lame I have understood (but haven't tried yet). But decoding is done by Netgear with probably cheapo-technique. Do you think that this machine will do any good with my NAD reciever and my Tannoy speakers?

Does anyone know of any other brand machines for connection with network and reciever?


Note, I'm no audiophile (i.e. I don't have as good ears as one). But I do like crisp and detailed sound.

Thanks,
Michael

take a look at the FAQ's. You may want to use --alt preset standard - I think this setting would be perfect for you. Also, you don't need Razor-Lame or something. Just use EAC with LAME and you'll be fine. In the FAQ LAME 3.90.3 is recommended - but many people prefer LAME 3.96 instead, since LAME 3.90.3 is pretty old (for software). 3.96 is also a lot faster and produces at least for 90% of my files much lower bitrates. You could try both and if you don't hear a difference (which you probably won't anyway), choose LAME 3.96, because of the advantages mentioned above (I use LAME 3.96 as well =)).

Thanks Jojo.
The standard preset was what I had in mind. So I don't need RazorLame? Why does it exist?

What would you concider the weakest link in the chain regarding quality of sound?
1. Encoding (Will use Lame with preset "standard")
2. Decoding (Netgear hardware?)
3. Pre amplifier (Netware hardware?)
4. Amplifier (I have a good one)
5. Speakers (I have good speakers)

/Michael

The MP3 standard defines the layout of the encoded data structures (bit stream) and how to decode them. Therefore, there is only one correct way to decode an MP3 stream. MP3 decoders don't make any difference regarding audio quality, unless they are broken and decode incorrectly, of course.

As you have already noticed, the encoding part is important for audio quality. In this forum you will find lots of infos about that. A good starting point is the FAQ page.


And your question "Does MP3 perform enough for HiFi? Anywhere I can read more about this?"
The standard reply can only be: try it yourself.
When you ask people you will get many different personal opinions, from "MP3 is the best" to "digital audio is all bad, vinyl is the only way".

Thanks smack.
This is good news. I was afraid that the decoding could be *bad* in the Netgear machine.

I'll try it out tomorrow when I get it.

/Michael

If the hardware you are planning to use for decoding is cheap, then you will probably get some audio quality degradation because of low-quality analog part (unless it has digital output).

There's a gazillion of them these days but my favorite for audio is still the Squeezebox.