I downloaded QT6.0 today and fortunately, my old reg. key for
QT5.0 upgraded it to pro version. So, I decided to test its MPEG-4
Audio encoder implementation. It seems that they have restricted
it to AAC Low Complexity codec. I started my listetning test
with my Grado SR-80 headphone. I hadn't got enough time to do really
careful listening tests and I had to restrict my tests to 128 kbps bitrate.
Anyways, my test cases and the results are as follows:
Test Case: Eternal Tears Of Sorrow - Autumn's Grief (Metal)
Settings: QT6.0 AAC-LC 128 Kbps
Results: Descent Frequency Response (No lowpass filter; altough the
frequnecy response from 16 khz to 22 khz has less intensity) Less detectable
pre-echo compared to the other competeing codecs (Psytell AAC, OGG Vorbis 1.0,
LAME 128 CBR alt-preset), Slight detectable flange, Perfect stereo image.
compared with the other codecs at this setting, QT6.0 AAC's overall quality is
better IMO.
Test Case: Castanets
Settings: QT6.0 AAC-LC 128 Kbps
Results: Almost the same amount of pre-echo compared to Psytell AAC,
MusePack and OGG Vorbis 1.0; Psytell AAC and MPC produce an annoying
flage-like effect in this case. OGG is probably the winner here.
Test Case: Spahm
Settings: QT6.0 AAC-LC 128 Kbps
Results: Lots of noise like other codecs. Each codec has its own
problem; but the overall quality of QT6.0 is obviously better compared
with the other codecs (128 kbps!)
My Conclusion: The overal quality (esp the first test case) has really
impressed me.
streaming purposes. Please let me know if you've done any other tests on
this codec. AAC has a really good potential for further developments for sure!
Cheers,
Mehrtash