Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: The Trouble with Vorbis
Hydrogenaudio Forums > Lossy Audio Compression > Ogg Vorbis > Ogg Vorbis - General
PatchWorKs
Taken from kuro5hin.org:

QUOTE
Ogg Vorbis may be the holy grail of patent-free audio compression, but there are some serious issues blocking its path to widespread acceptance. Unfortunately most of us are powerless to correct the situation; the problems must be addressed by Vorbis' creators.


and then:

QUOTE
I am the author of MAD, a fixed-point MPEG audio decoder library currently used by many software applications. I implemented MAD from scratch using the specification contained in the official ISO/IEC standards documents. For some time I have been asked and have wanted to write a similar library for Ogg Vorbis, but as I will explain, for all practical purposes this is currently impossible. While I am very interested in supporting Vorbis, I am held back by the current state of affairs. I believe I am not alone; the present situation is unnecessarily delaying the acceptance of Vorbis, and I think the strategy for Vorbis advocacy needs to be reexamined.
(check out the above website for more infos)


Hey... i really want VAD ! sad.gif
Jon Ingram
You might notice that this story was posted in April, and was discussed on HA at the time.

Also, if you read more than the first few lines, you'll notice what he says the problem is:

QUOTE

The specification for Ogg Vorbis is currently incomplete and is unavailable in its entirety. This presents a problem for anyone who wants to create an independent implementation of the codec. 

Without a specification, would-be authors of independent implementations are forced to reverse-engineer the reference implementation, with varying degrees of success. Indeed, independent implementations have no hope of remaining relevant in the face of an evolving reference implementation, and are prone to compatibility problems, unintentional or otherwise. 


Well, we now *have* a spec, and a very well written one -- the release of Vorbis 1 was even delayed by a week so it could be improved.

Summary: problem solved.
PatchWorKs
Thanks a lot...
I know the story was a bit outdated... just curiosity.
britannica
QUOTE
Originally posted by Jon Ingram
You might notice that this story was posted in April, and was discussed on HA at the time.

Also, if you read more than the first few lines, you'll notice what he says the problem is:



Well, we now *have* a spec, and a very well written one -- the release of Vorbis 1 was even delayed by a week so it could be improved.

Summary: problem solved.


But there's always somebody wants to rain on your parade - note the warning in the last paragraph
of this article .

We all thought jpeg was untouchable !!

It was encouraging to see the BBC trialling Ogg Vorbis for streaming, they seemed to be having some success but suddenly dropped it and although there has been no official explanation as to why, - rumour has it there were concerns about patent issues.

Convincing the commercial world of the patent-free status of Vorbis could prove to be a harder task than it's development, but of course I hope I'm wrong.


ß
Garf
QUOTE
Originally posted by britannica

Convincing the commercial world of the patent-free status of Vorbis could prove to be a harder task than it's development, but of course I hope I'm wrong.


They convinced AOL. How much bigger can you go?

--
GCP
Jon Ingram
QUOTE
It was encouraging to see the BBC trialling Ogg Vorbis for streaming, they seemed to be having some success but suddenly dropped it and although there has been no official explanation as to why, -  rumour has it there were concerns about patent issues.

Nope. The BBC set up experimental Vorbis streams for a trial period. The trial period ended, and so did the streams. In fact, several of the streams carried on after the trial period, due to the persuasive nature of the listeners smile.gif.

There are *no* concerns about patent issues. Two seperate teams have researched the issue, and found no relevant patents. Almost all the code in Vorbis is based on 50 year old research.
A_Klingon
I forget where I read it, but there are those who believe, that with so much ($$$) at stake, Fraunhofer will, the *moment* vorbis approaches anywhere *near* critical-mass status (or even appears to be a viable contender), will file for patent-infringement just for spite. They probably have enough financial clout to make life miserable for all of us.

Even though such a lawsuit would likely be based on pure bulls--t, it could create a cloud of doubt and worry in the minds of any smaller independent manufacturer contemplating the inclusion of vorbis into its product(s).
Garf
QUOTE
Originally posted by A_Klingon
I forget where I read it, but there are those who believe,


There are some who believe Elvis is alive.

--
GCP
bluewer than blue
QUOTE
Originally posted by Garf


There are some who believe Elvis is alive.

-- 
GCP


ELVIS IS DEAD?!? sad.gif
HotshotGG
QUOTE
They convinced AOL. How much bigger can you go?


laugh.gif

QUOTE
They probably have enough financial clout to make life miserable for all of us.


It wouldn't be the first time. :sign:
Garf
Note that if FhG sues (they've been doing the 'we think it's unlikely they don't infringe' thing since rc1 or so) *and* loses they've irreversably given their biggest competitior a big push and confirmed that Vorbis is indeed free of patents. At that point, there is no return.

On the other hand, they can keep 'we'll sue them' FUD as long as they don't actually sue. It costs nothing and if it doesn't work they can still sue if desperation sets in.

I think it was Monty that said that he would actually *like* to be sued by FhG at this point.

--
GCP
jgalt
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by Garf


There are some who believe Elvis is alive.

--
GCP
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



ELVIS IS DEAD?!?
==================================

WHO IS ELVIS?
Jon Ingram
WHO IS ELVIS?
[img]63f4207d08[/img]
Thank you, thank you very much.
A_Klingon
LOL ! GOOD ONE JON !! smile.gif smile.gif smile.gif

To Garf, Super Moderator:

>>> There are some who believe Elvis is alive.

Well, Garf - one has to look ahead, or at least try to. You needn't wade through the large article here -- http://www.tnl.net/newsletter/2001/vorbis.asp , *but*, therein it says,

"......analysts say Thompson and the Fraunhofer Institute are likely to file patent lawsuits the moment Vorbis appears to be a viable market candidate. By creating a perception of uncertainty around Vorbis' future, MP3's parents could prevent conservative digital music companies from adopting."

(And presumably potential hardware developers too).

I hope *very much* it never comes to that, but I don't trust anyone with the financial clout of Fraunhofer who might want to crucify any 'upstart codec' who would dare to "rain on their parade".
A_Klingon
Oh my living g-a-w-w-d.....what is this ???

http://www.realnetworks.com/company/press/.../2002/xiph.html

Since Real Networks potentially put their head on the chopping block by recently going open source, things have certainly been happening !!!

Real, one-time vorbis contender, now partner? (okie-dokie) This one will probably require a whole new thread.....
Garf
QUOTE
Originally posted by A_Klingon

\"......analysts say Thompson and the Fraunhofer Institute are likely to file patent lawsuits the moment Vorbis appears to be a viable market candidate. By creating a perception of uncertainty around Vorbis' future, MP3's parents could prevent conservative digital music companies from adopting.\"

(And presumably potential hardware developers too).

I hope *very much* it never comes to that, but I don't trust anyone with the financial clout of Fraunhofer who might want to crucify any 'upstart codec' who would dare to \"rain on their parade\".


As I said, it's pure FUD. Vorbis would *like* to be sued by FhG at this point. They *know* they will win and it gets them huge publicity. As long as FhG doesn't actually sue they can keep spewing out FUD like that and some people will fall for it.

--
GCP
britannica
QUOTE
Originally posted by Garf


They convinced AOL. How much bigger can you go?

-- 
GCP



You mean the Winamp plugin ??........ that's the only association I can find.

ß
Garf
QUOTE
Originally posted by britannica

You mean the Winamp plugin ??........ that's the only association I can find. 
ß


Yes. Before the plugin was allowed into the official distribution, AOL's lawyers did their own patent search on Vorbis and eventually agreed that Vorbis was free of patents.

--
GCP
britannica
QUOTE
Originally posted by A_Klingon
Oh my living g-a-w-w-d.....what is this ???

http://www.realnetworks.com/company/press/.../2002/xiph.html

Real, one-time vorbis contender, now partner? (okie-dokie) This one will probably require a whole new thread.....


I can never understand the cryptic biz-speak in these press releases, everything is expressed in terms of 'driven empowerment'.

Does this announcement mean that Real are going to promote Vorbis at the expense of their own codec ? If not what does it mean ?

ß
DSPguru
QUOTE
Originally posted by Garf


There are some who believe Elvis is alive.

-- 
GCP
yea, i heard he is working on a new album.
producers promised a duet with kylie minouge :crystal: .
HotshotGG
QUOTE
producers promised a duet with kylie minouge


:eyebrow: that would be something to see. laugh.gif
Destroid
This is kinda late in the discussion, but concering Ogg Vorbos "issues" I guess implemention for developers is not one of them. I had been making subtle hints on a gaming forum whenever the request for MP3 playback came up that they should look at Ogg too. Lo and behold, the main developer thinks he might skip the MP3 support and go staright to Ogg because he said it would be easy to do. Pardon if it seems like I'm blowing my own horn...
indybrett
QUOTE
Originally posted by britannica


I can never understand the cryptic biz-speak in these press releases, everything is expressed in terms of 'driven empowerment'. 

Does this announcement mean that Real are going to promote Vorbis at the expense of their own codec ? If not what does it mean ?

ß


It's been beaten to death on Slashdot.

http://slashdot.org/articles/02/07/24/203247.shtml?tid=141

Don't know what it means, but anytime somebody says they are going to start supporting Ogg, I smile, even though I know there is some corporate greed behind it.
greenirft
QUOTE
Originally posted by indybrett


It's been beaten to death on Slashdot.

http://slashdot.org/articles/02/07/24/203247.shtml?tid=141

Don't know what it means, but anytime somebody says they are going to start supporting Ogg, I smile, even though I know there is some corporate greed behind it.


as long as the corporate greed eventually translates into better sounding audio at a smaller size file, and/or slightly cheaper pricing for the product (or more $ going to the actual developers). Then all is good.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.