The relation between burning speed and compatibility is merely an apparent one. What matters is the error level of the media at a given speed, and that will vary from burner to burner, too (and even from one firmware revision to another). The "the lower the speed, the fewer the errors" rule is no longer universal: I've seen (and have scans to prove it) some MCC media burn better at 24x than at 16x or 4x.
I will concede that unless you have a winning combo on your hands (e.g. a Plex + TY) it is prudent not to push beyond a certain limit when burning CD-DA, though.
A further complication is that the brand the disc is marketed under is more often than not misleading. I bought a spindle of 52x Maxells some four months ago, and they were Prodisc. A couple of weeks ago I picked up another one, and it was CMC. Same packaging and the discs look exactly the same.
I've seen all kinds of Sonys, too (mostly crap). And believe it or not, I still have a few Memorex-branded Taiyo Yudens lying around (though CMC is a lot easier to run into :). The only way to be sure of what you are getting is to go with a well-established product line like Maxell CD-R Pro (TY) or Verbatim DataLife Plus (MCC); or else to buy from a reputable place like
Rima who sell genuine bulk TY.
Lastly, there is CD-R Freaks' media
test results database, along with their excellent
Media FAQ. The FAQ, btw, covers these issues in detail.
The bottom line with optical media is: YMMV =). Test and see what results you get on
your system with a particular media at a particular speed. For CD-DA burning, I wouldn't go over 24x.
P.S. I never observed the purported difference in tracks layout between CD-Rs burned at different speed. Perhaps I don't know what to look for? Hmm, some scans would be nice to see, ddrawley :>
P.S.2. (free grammar lecture :)
CODE
information = data, news, knowledge
informations = messages
Please note that in common usage
information has no plural.
The school is in - yay!
edit: cosmetics