@all: Can somebody point me to the exact setting which changes the behaviour of the active item frame (in XP)?
@musicmusic 1:I think there is a bug concerning the active item frame in 0.2 RC 1 on win xp sp2
- start foobar
- select another playlist
-> there is _no_ selected item visible
- minimize the window
- maximize window
-> the active frame is now displayed
I don't know if this is intended...
@musicmusic 2:the current behavior:
- change to a playlist were you haven't been before in the current session
-> one item shows the active item frame but otherwise looks "normal"
the behavior from several versions ago:
- change to a playlist were you haven't been before in the current session
-> one item in the playlist was displayed as it was "fully selected"
(I hope you understand what I'm talking about. If not, then I can make some screenshots)
Personally, I prefer the old behavior, it just looks better. I don't like this unfilled active frame at all... Is there any chance that this could be changed back? This should also help the other people who do not like the new behavior of the active frame thing...
@musicmusic 3:Some time ago I played around with several music players on Linux and there is one thing (actually the only thing

) I really miss now in columns ui: if you double click on a entry in the playlist selection list in Rythmbox, then it will stop the current song and start playing in the playlist you clicked on. This doesn't sound like it is that a useful feature, but if you get used to it...
@musicmusic 4:In the globals setting of the playlist view:
Can a global variable only be set once (using $set_global)?
I have a problem were want to a variable to "a" at the beginning of the script. Depending on some tags in a file, the value of this variable should then be changed in some cases to "b" or "c". This doesn't work for me, as it seems I can set a global variable only once and then this value is fixed and can't be changed lateron...
Does this makes sense? Have I missed something from the documentation?
and last but not least:
It's nice to see that the development of columns ui has not stopped, thanks a lot and keep up the incredible work
edit: added the 4th question