Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: New Ripping Guide for EAC
Hydrogenaudio Forums > CD-R and Audio Hardware > CD Hardware/Software
liekloo
Hello Colleagues smile.gif,

I'd like to shortly introduce the EAC guide I've made.

I've spent several years on HA now, reading and exchanging thoughts with others. Meanwhile I learnt things that I didn't know before, that are written in no guide but I wouldn't want to miss anymore. (Sounds familiar? wink.gif)

Nothing in EAC is as important as a correct drive config. Nevertheless, EAC guides generally neglect this step. The result: unpleasant surprises, and many questions (even from advanced users). Pio2001 had the excellent idea to put that essential info in a FAQ. I've made this guide to make sure newbies get that info right from the start. Shortens your learning trajectory, saves you frustrations wink.gif. Pio2001 was immediately enthusiastic and offered to review the guide (thank you for that).

The guide is clear & simple, but correct. Some time is spent for fundamental things (how EAC basically works) and based on that, letting the reader realize how certain settings affect rip quality. By giving people such insights, I think a lot of the usual trouble can be prevented.

One sentence to say it all: This is the guide I wish I had back when I was a newbie. smile.gif

The guide is written and here ends my job. Now it is up to you guys to link to this guide, so that it reaches the audience it is meant for. Feedback is appreciated as well.

Best Regards,
liekloo

(EDIT: url update, November 2005)
JayDPiii
QUOTE(liekloo @ Nov 13 2004, 03:02 PM)
Hello Colleagues smile.gif,

I'd like to shortly introduce the EAC guide I've made.

The guide is clear & simple, but correct. Some time is spent for fundamental things (how EAC basically works) and based on that, letting the reader realize how certain settings affect rip quality. By giving people such insights, I think a lot of the usual trouble can be prevented.

One sentence to say it all: This is the guide I wish I had back when I was a newbie. smile.gif

The guide is written and here ends my job. Now it is up to you guys to link to this guide, so that it reaches the audience it is meant for. Feedback is appreciated as well.

Best Regards,
liekloo
*


As I'm still fairly new to ripping. And went through a lot of websites and forums, here. And still not sure in some areas. I've started reading your new guide. Good Job! Kudo's! Thanks! It is clear and simple.

I have not gotten to the Tell Me More part, yet, which is the stuff I know little about.

However, you have one link so far, that doesn't work:

For a 'Various Artists' CD mark 'Various Artists' and name ...
JayDPiii
QUOTE(liekloo @ Nov 13 2004, 03:02 PM)
Hello Colleagues smile.gif,

Now it is up to you guys to link to this guide, so that it reaches the audience it is meant for. Feedback is appreciated as well.

Best Regards,
liekloo
*



Another slight correction: Where it has:

The file 01 - Wild World contains T1, in which 00:00:00 to 00:00:03 is a gap

Should be :33 and not :03

Sorry, I write training for software for a living, and I can't help but notice these things.
Andavari
On the guide: Ripping Guide -> Configuring -> Drive Options
QUOTE
Gap detection starts and should take only a few seconds per track. Do the same for Methods B and C. The fastest of the 3 Methods is the best for your drive. If none of the 3 works (typically EAC will 'hang' on a track) change Secure into Accurate or Inaccurate and run through the 3 methods again.

About 10 hours ago I was trying to detect the gaps on a CD with alot of scratches, and other visible damage that looked like scuff marks. EAC slowed down on many tracks, even though the correct gap detection method was selected. You may want to include information about scratched CD's and possible slowdowns when detecting gaps.
----------
On the guide: Tell Me More -> Repairing a damaged CD
QUOTE
3. Clean with water. If you think you've done enough, clean the CD with water. Be careful when you wipe off the water (this causes new scratces). A radial direction is a good idea.

What! Are you saying to wipe the disc in a circle?
For years its been stated (even by record labels on the disc packaging) to wipe from the center circle to the outer edges, hence making a scratch going from center to outer edge usually won't produce serious problems, versus going in a circle may make a track un-rippable/un-playable.
----------
I'd think some information about looking at the read surface on a CD before trying to rip it to see if it needs to be cleaned would make a nice addition. A fingerprint or other residue (dust/skin flake) can cause some headaches and drastic slowdowns. Just about every CD I have ever ripped needs to either be blown on to get visible dust particals off it, or needs to be cleaned.
mp4junkie
I've was downloading your guide with httrack
[ http://www.httrack.com/ ]

and I got some errors:
06:24:43 Error: "Not Found" (404) at link home-12.tiscali-business.nl/~tpm54044/eac/sub/VA.png (from home-12.tiscali-
business.nl/~tpm54044/eac/eac3.htm)

Probably because of UNIX being case sensitive:
http://home-12.tiscali-business.nl/~tpm54044/eac/sub/VA.PNG

Thought I would give you a heads up.
dreamliner77
QUOTE(Andavari @ Nov 14 2004, 07:18 AM)
What! Are you saying to wipe the disc in a circle?
.
*


Radial means from the center out, as in on the radius.
liekloo
Glad to have such attentive readers. Thanks, all of you smile.gif

I tried to reply earlier, but right when I was available the forum seemed to be down.

As Dreamliner pointed out, the word 'radial' means from center to edge (this is also said in the guide). So there is nothing to worry about, Andavari smile.gif
westgroveg
This is a nice guide but it needs a nice logo & brand name wink.gif

You know, like it belongs to something & to know a large group of people are using it for it's purpose
Digga
a little bit ot...
is Brasso only available in the UK (where it was invented AFAIK) and maybe the US, or does it also go under some other name in Europe?
I know one could use any other metal polish, but Brasso seems to be popular.
liekloo
QUOTE(westgroveg @ Nov 17 2004, 06:20 AM)
This is a nice guide but it needs a nice logo & brand name wink.gif

I was just thinking the same thing: a guide without a name is like a person without a name. Doomed to stay unknown biggrin.gif. I'll call it "the Essential ripping guide".

QUOTE(Digga @ Nov 17 2004, 07:05 AM)
is Brasso only available in the UK (where it was invented AFAIK) and maybe the US, or does it also go under some other name in Europe? I know one could use any other metal polish, but Brasso seems to be popular.

Good question, I don't know. The guide mentions the name 'brasso' because it is so known for this purpose (removing scratches from CDs). In reality you can use any similar product. I for instance, have never used the brand "Brasso", what I use is copper polish.
Pio2001
In France Brasso is unknown. There are two big manufacturers :
Bulher makes "Bul'argent" for silver and "Bul'cuivre" for copper.
Henkel makes "Argentil" for silver and "Miror" for Copper.
Jan S.
QUOTE(The Guide)
it reads everything twice and compares. Differences between the two reads indicate bad, misread parts, which EAC will then keep reading untill the data doesn't change anymore (= untill the data is correct). This so-called secure mode takes time, but your rip is flawless.

I am not sure what you mean by "data doesn't change anymore".
It re-reads untill it is statisticly almost certain that it found the correct result.

QUOTE(EAC readme)
If an error occurs (read or sync error), the program keeps on reading this sector, until eight of 16 retries are identical, but at maximum one, three or five times (according to the error recovery quality) these 16 retries are read. So, in the worst case, bad sectors are read up to 82 times!
Digga
QUOTE(liekloo @ Nov 17 2004, 01:08 PM)
Good question, I don't know. The guide mentions the name 'brasso' because it is so known for this purpose (removing scratches from CDs). In reality you can use any similar product. I for instance, have never used the brand "Brasso", what I use is copper polish.
QUOTE(Pio2001 @ Nov 18 2004, 12:10 AM)
In France Brasso is unknown. There are two big manufacturers :
Bulher makes "Bul'argent" for silver and "Bul'cuivre" for copper.
Henkel makes "Argentil" for silver and "Miror" for Copper.

smile.gif o.k., thank you. I will use a cheapo brand from a local store then. just felt a little unsure, as all web resources I came across metioned all mighty Brasso somehow.
evereux
I've had quite alot of success on minor scratches with toothpaste.
cman
Really good guide. I must say it is much more clearer than most of the guides I've read, not to name any names wink.gif and has a really good layout.

The one thing I might suggest is integrating it into HA...
Digisurfer
Edit: Forgot to say thanks for the great guide. Easily one of the best I've seen to date. smile.gif

Edit: Erm, posted dumb question. Figured it out for myself. rolleyes.gif
esa372
Thanks, liekloo..!

biggrin.gif

~esa
liekloo
QUOTE(Jan S. @ Nov 18 2004, 01:19 AM)
QUOTE(The Guide)
EAC will keep reading untill the data doesn't change anymore (= untill the data is correct
I am not sure what you mean by "data doesn't change anymore". It re-reads untill it is statisticly almost certain that it found the correct result.
Yes that is what it means, i.e. consistent results over multiple read attempts. I'll rephraze the sentence in question.
Additionally, Digga's (relevant) brasso question is now answered in the guide.

QUOTE(cman @ Nov 18 2004, 04:25 PM)
Really good guide (...) The one thing I might suggest is integrating it into HA...

Very relevant remark. However at this moment this would go beyond my available time.
anykey
Thank you, this guide has helped me a lot - including the tip about using Brasso - it works - and so does your wonderful guide. biggrin.gif biggrin.gif biggrin.gif
Artie
Yup . . . thanks for the great guide. It explained a couple of things, (like the error correction and C2 thing), better than I had seen before.

Now I understand. smile.gif

Thanks.
rohangc
Why not incorporate the excellent guide into the HA KB/Wiki?
zilexa
QUOTE(rohangc @ Dec 2 2004, 06:40 AM)
Why not incorporate the excellent guide into the HA KB/Wiki?
*


Hi there...
I have a suggestion..

in the guide.. you have this commandline for Ogg encoder:
-q 5 -a "%a" -t "%t" -l "%g" -d "%y" -N "%n" -G "%m" %s -o %d

But, if you select "Ogg Vorbis Encoder" in the 'External Compression' > 'Parameter passing scheme', this should be enough: -q 5
Since EAC will then set the tags automatically... (v0.95 prebeta5)
mfhboy
QUOTE(liekloo @ Nov 14 2004, 03:02 AM)
Hello Colleagues smile.gif,

I'd like to shortly introduce the EAC guide I've made.


Wow~~~ I hat off to you liekloo w00t.gif w00t.gif
skelly831
Really nice guide liekloo!, it has a lot of stuff other guides suppose the user already knows, many thanks!
smz
Its not available any more (HTTP Error 404) crying.gif

Does anybody knows if it is mirrored somewhere elese?


TNX


Sergio
Andavari
Via Google I found it mirrored at:
http://home.tiscali-business.be/~tpm54044/index.htm
smz
QUOTE(Andavari @ Nov 3 2005, 04:43 PM)
Via Google I found it mirrored at:
http://home.tiscali-business.be/~tpm54044/index.htm
*



Many thanks!

Sergio
boojum
QUOTE(Pio2001 @ Nov 17 2004, 03:10 PM)
In France Brasso is unknown. There are two big manufacturers :
Bulher makes "Bul'argent" for silver and "Bul'cuivre" for copper.
Henkel makes "Argentil" for silver and "Miror" for Copper.
*




This is so late in the thread I do not know if it will make sense, but there is a German polish. SimiChrome. A very fine polish. Much finer than Brasso which is quite coarse alongside SimiChrome. Used to be sold at VW dealers and anyone carrying German car parts and accessories. It will polish a scratch out of a watch crystal. cool.gif
liekloo
QUOTE(smz @ Nov 3 2005, 02:49 PM)
Its not available any more (HTTP Error 404)  crying.gif

Does anybody knows if it is mirrored somewhere elese?

The guide's URL has changed (I switched to a new ISP):
http://users.fulladsl.be/spb2267

This thread is updated, soon the FAQ will be as well (I've messaged Pio2001).
smz
Hi!

Thankyou for the new URL. I modified a recent post of mine to reflect the new URL.

Really a well written document, important to this community, IMHO.

Thanks again for it.

Sergio

Edit: BTW.... Your signature still says "home-12.tiscali-business.nl/~tpm54044" huh.gif
beamrider
Might be a stupid question, but what would be the better program to use with a Plextor 12/10/32 drive? PLexTools, or EAC?
smz
QUOTE(beamrider @ Nov 19 2005, 10:52 PM)
Might be a stupid question, but what would be the better program to use with a Plextor 12/10/32 drive?  PLexTools, or EAC?
*



Beamrider, welcome to HA!

I think you are highly Off-Topic on this thread, and you should had started your own for your question, but...

Assuming that you are asking for the best program for RIPPING (not burning), my personal answer is... it depends.

Both are great programs and both have their limits (and bugs).

What are u willing to do? Rip each track to a separate file or a whole album to an IMAGE+CUE? To uncompressed PCM (.wav), to a lossy compressed format (e.g. MP3) or a lossless compressed format (e.g. WavPack)?

Try browsing and searching this forum archives. You'll see this is something has already been debated several times.

Personally for everyday use with CDs that are in a good shape I now use EAC but with the undocumented -usefua option, to put less stress on my Plextors (do a search for it if you need more information on that). When I encounter problems I use PlexTools with its advanced recovery options (recover best sector/recover best bytes).

Sergio

Edit: changed last paragraph organization a little bit.
liekloo
A year ago I bought a Plextor & Plextools, hoping that Plextools would do what EAC couldn't: extract from a badly scratched CD.

I personally didn't see much difference between Plextools' and EAC's error correction power. On scratched CDs that EAC gave up on (5-10), Plextools hardly did a better job, for it did not succeed to extract the full track without errors. I had the impression it managed to go deeper than EAC did, but in the end both programs failed to deliver a perfect rip. Which makes them equal for my purposes (I'm only interested in perfect rips).

'Equal' should be taken with a grain of salt though: Plextools is fairly new and not as well tested as EAC is. I recall a thread on this forum where it was found that Plextools' error recovery was sometimes faulty, which was quite a letdown! All errors were claimed to be perfectly recovered, but the resulting rip was faulty.

In terms of speed Plextools totally crushes EAC (much much faster).
smz
QUOTE(liekloo @ Nov 30 2005, 02:08 PM)
...
In terms of speed Plextools totally crushes EAC (much much faster).
*



Have you tried EAC in FUA mode? wink.gif

Cheers.

Sergio
liekloo
You're right, it seems like the latest drives can be lightning fast with EAC. Thanks for pointing my attention to this very welcome news smile.gif
Defsac
QUOTE(Andavari @ Nov 14 2004, 09:18 PM)
For years its been stated (even by record labels on the disc packaging) to wipe from the center circle to the outer edges, hence making a scratch going from center to outer edge usually won't produce serious problems, versus going in a circle may make a track un-rippable/un-playable.
I personally go for the "drive spin dry" option. I've got an old Liteon DVD-ROM drive connected to the PC, and after cleaning I wash the CD with filtered water, shake it by the edges to remove the excess water and then insert it into the drive. The drive then spins up the disc and the water is flung off the CD surface. I then switch it to my main optical drive for ripping. Amazingly, the drive still works perfectly after 50 odd CDs.
Shade[ST]
Your screenshots are kind of ugly...;
If you'd like, I can take some for you and email them or whatever; write the text in a nicer, anti-aliased font, etc...
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.