Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Evidence that LAME is the best mp3 encoder
Hydrogenaudio Forums > Lossy Audio Compression > MP3 > MP3 - Tech
jaybeee
I know LAME is the best, but I'm after some evidence (listening tests/results etc) that I can reference for some work I'm doing.

I know about Roberto's MP3 at 128kbps public listening test and 64kbps public listening test of course. But I can't seem to find any others that compares LAME with Blade, FhG etc. I know the aforementioned two tests are evidence enough, but I just wondered if there was anymore? I expect these tests to have taken place quite a while ago, so maybe that's why it's harder to locate them?

This evidence is simply gonna be used to explain why LAME is the best.

Thanks
Gabriel
On Rarewares you have:

*
http://www.rjamorim.com/test/128extension/results.html
There you have Lame and Blade

*
http://www.rjamorim.com/test/mp3-128/presentation.html
mp3 @ 128

On ff123.net you have:

*
http://ff123.net/dogies/dogies_plots.html
There you have Lame against Xing

*
http://ff123.net/128test/interim.html
There you have Lame against Xing
jaybeee
QUOTE (Gabriel @ Mar 4 2005, 11:54 AM)
On Rarewares you have:

*
http://www.rjamorim.com/test/128extension/results.html
There you have Lame and Blade

*
http://www.rjamorim.com/test/mp3-128/presentation.html
mp3 @ 128

On ff123.net you have:

*
http://ff123.net/dogies/dogies_plots.html
There you have Lame against Xing

*
http://ff123.net/128test/interim.html
There you have Lame against Xing
*


Unfortunately, I can't access rarewares from my work PC dry.gif. Gets blocked cos the blocking software thinks it's a Music download site!!

Anyway, the second ref refers to the results section that I posted above.

Thanks for the other two.

That'll do.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2009 Invision Power Services, Inc.