Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Transcoding Quality
Hydrogenaudio Forums > Hydrogenaudio Forum > General Audio
consultant
I'm curious if anyone has compared the playback quality of a low bitrate MP3 (say 96-128 VBR or 128 CBR) that was ripped direct from a CD versus one that was transcoded from a high bitrate MP3 such as 240 VBR. I know transcoding is re-encoding artifacts, but I would guess the sound quality should be instinguishable since the final product is not very high quality. I know many people recommend using Monkeyaudio or so other lossless compressed format to store all your audio for re-encoding in the future but I'm wondering why not just store them in really high quality MP3 format 240 kbit VBR and above?

It seems the only reason to re-encode in the future if you already have high quality rips would be to produce smaller filesizes but with storage getting increasingly cheaper, I doubt that will ever be necessary.
Cosmo
QUOTE (consultant @ Mar 7 2005, 06:33 PM)
I would guess the sound quality should be instinguishable since the final product is not very high quality.
Physical analysis would prove that there is a difference. A perceived difference in quality would depend upon the hearing ability of the individual.
ChiGung
http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index....=0&#entry279801

Consultant, be honest, did you search?
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2009 Invision Power Services, Inc.