Hi,
what do you think is the quality of 3GPP's HE-AAC +SBR/PS reference implementation? As it is completely available in source code, I consider there could be heavy restrictions considering quality of SBR and PS implementation.
Regards, GW
Full Version: Enhanced AAC+ 3GPP reference implementation
At least the SBR/PS part is crippled. I didn't look at the pure AAC part enough to tell.
The crippiling isn't actually so bad, though...
The crippiling isn't actually so bad, though...
QUOTE(Groundskeeper Willie @ Mar 22 2005, 03:14 AM)
Hi,
what do you think is the quality of 3GPP's HE-AAC +SBR/PS reference implementation? As it is completely available in source code, I consider there could be heavy restrictions considering quality of SBR and PS implementation.
Regards, GW
what do you think is the quality of 3GPP's HE-AAC +SBR/PS reference implementation? As it is completely available in source code, I consider there could be heavy restrictions considering quality of SBR and PS implementation.
Regards, GW
Willie,
As I was told by the people from Coding Technologies, 3GPP HE+PS AAC encoder (they wrote) is "optimized for quality" since it is the 3G's NORMATIVE implementation. It is very well maintained and should be bug-free (contrary to ISO code). However, it is "NOT usable for anything but 3G compliant products", so you will have to honor their rights...
Daniel
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.