QUOTE(Supacon @ Mar 29 2005, 02:57 AM)
I'd be interested in hearing if there are actually any real advantages of SATA other than the fact that it's Serial ATA, uses smaller cables, has no jumper configuration, etc.
I've actually heard that SATA can be more CPU intensive than PATA, at least for hard drives. I'd love to have a drive that I could rip bad audio CDs with, and still playback music without skipping (on my NForce2 motherboard, which has issues with IDE bus usage and simultaneous sound playback).
This drive seems to review well. Personally, I've got the BenQ 1620A, but I've hardly ever burned DVDs with it (yet). I did one onto some cheap media, and it worked, but that's all I can say. I'll be archiving some of my lossless rips onto DVD soon, so maybe I will do some scans.
I had a problem with my BenQ 1620A, however, when I was ripping gazillions of CDs with EAC with it. Every now and then, when I went to rip to cuesheet and image, the drive would kind of "lock up" the computer for a few minutes, then say that detection mode is not available for this drive, or some such thing. It was a huge pain, because I basically had to reboot my computer.
When I look at drives, ripping scratched CDs well is a big priority for me. The BenQ has no C2 error correction (CDRINfo claims that the Plextor doesn't either, which I really wonder about), and I don't believe it caches audio data. The BenQ 1620 is thus quite fast at reading the scratched discs compared to some drives. (But on the other hand, plextools is quite good at this too, except Plextools pro XL requires another $60 investment in itself, and aside from it's error correction capabilities, isn't too great for CD Ripping, in my opinion.)
Hope some of this info helps!
Thanks for the reply Supacon, it is helpfull indeed.
I think ill go for the BenQ, the plextor is over my budget anyway

. As for the SATA, as far as i know there isnt any advantages other then convinience (no jumpers etc), but still, it would be nice to get rid of that big ATA cable IMO.
QUOTE(Doktor_Lorenz @ Mar 29 2005, 12:22 PM)
QUOTE(Supacon @ Mar 29 2005, 08:57 AM)
I'd be interested in hearing if there are actually any real advantages of SATA other than the fact that it's Serial ATA, uses smaller cables, has no jumper configuration, etc.
I've actually heard that SATA can be more CPU intensive than PATA, at least for hard drives. I'd love to have a drive that I could rip bad audio CDs with, and still playback music without skipping (on my NForce2 motherboard, which has issues with IDE bus usage and simultaneous sound playback).
Well all I can say is that from going PATA to SATA, I've only had one REAL Gripe which in my opinion is a design flaw. The actual connecting the HDD was easy just attach it and play, but whilst i was installing my GFX card [which is HUGE] I had to ease the gfx card at an angle to get it in then insert it in the agp slot, whilst doing so i accidently brushed past the SATA connector and managed to break the plug where the wire plugs into. being as I brought a Western Digital Raptor this could have been a very expensive mistake had i not solved the broken plug issue by easing the cable back on with the bare metal data cable back on to the plastic. If I havent explained myself well, i'll be happy to take some photos for you to show you how i broke this [Far too easy to break really].
As for the speed issue I'm very pleased with buying my pair of raptors, I don't need to put them in raid to get a REALLY fast boot up and load time with them.
I really doubt ill have the same issues since theres plenty of clearance between my AGP and SATA.
Also, we are talking about CD/DVD drives not Hard Drives. Thanks for the input though.