Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: difference between MPEG2-AAC and MPEG4-AAC ?
Hydrogenaudio Forums > Lossy Audio Compression > AAC > AAC - Tech
legg
AAC is used as the common name for MPEG4-AAC. But there's also MPEG2-AAC.

Is MPEG-4 AAC built on MPEG-2 AAC? or is it a completely new standard?
What are the advantages of each? main differences?

Thanks in advance.

ps. If this has been asked before, excuse me, I did use the search button but found nothing.
Garf
MPEG4-AAC == MPEG2-AAC + PNS tool + AAC Long Term Prediction profile (AAC LTP)

For practical use, the availability of the PNS tool is useful for low bitrates. AAC LTP is basically never used.
legg
QUOTE(Garf @ Apr 6 2005, 02:59 PM)
MPEG4-AAC == MPEG2-AAC + PNS tool + AAC Long Term Prediction profile (AAC LTP)

For practical use, the availability of the PNS tool is useful for low bitrates. AAC LTP is basically never used.
*



So it should be safe to say that MPEG-2 AAC and MPEG-4 AAC are equivalent at average and higher bit rates (>128kbps)?


Also, is there a reason as to why AAC LTP basically never used?



Greetings.
Garf
More complexity, fairly little gain.
schonenberg
Will LTP ever be used?
rjamorim
QUOTE(schonenberg @ Apr 7 2005, 12:46 PM)
Will LTP ever be used?
*



It probably has its niches, but I don't think it will ever be popular. At least, not as popular as LC.
Garf
It won't help that HE-AAC's extensions are only specified for LC AAC.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.