Full Version: --alt-preset Insane == --alt-preset 320?
Are they identical?
--alt-preset Insane == --alt-preset cbr 320
With CBR they are indentical, without they don't.
With CBR they are indentical, without they don't.
Oh, sorry. They are identical even withnout cbr. My fault... 
Well, I would think they are identical since the only way to get average 320 is to use 320 on all frames => same as cbr 320 => same as insane.
But its not clear from the sticky thread about settings.
But its not clear from the sticky thread about settings.
The details could be different--there are a lot of switches beside the bitrate setting... e.g. they would be different from just plain -b 320, for example.
QUOTE(Joe Bloggs @ Sep 10 2002 - 04:18 PM)
The details could be different--there are a lot of switches beside the bitrate setting... e.g. they would be different from just plain -b 320, for example.
I did a few tests and "--alt-preset insane", "--alt-preset cbr 320" and "--alt-preset 320" give me bit-to-bit identical results.
Plain -b 320, no '--alt-preset' in the command line...
QUOTE(Joe Bloggs @ Sep 10 2002 - 08:55 AM)
Plain -b 320, no '--alt-preset' in the command line...
Joe Bloggs, I am new to mp3 encoding. How is the -b 320 different from usin ---alt-preset?
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.