QUOTE
Originally posted by Ookami
Good questions? Heh, I think someone else should ask them. Hehehe...
Ok, few brief answers, somebody else may write additions... I will also later.
1.) What are the pro's and con's of MPC (if you compare it to the other formats like MP3, OGG etc.)?
Answer:
Pro's: Hihger quality at mid and high bitrates, faster, well tweaked official presets (unlike in Lame)
con's: encoder not open source
2.) I think I heard a problem in an MPC clip! What do I do now?
Answer:
First make sure that if you are using Winamp for playback, that MP+/MPC plugin settings "EQ controlled by WinAmp" and "(Experimental) clipping prevention" are disabled.
Then you should check that the difference is not imaginery by doing blind listening tests. Best program for this is PCABX
http://www.pcabx.com/program/index.htm
You can do blind tests also with Winamp using shuffle mode or randomize list option, but make sure you do enough repetitions.
After that you should contact the community (
http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/) or developers, and make the clip available for download.
3.) Where are some good guides (links) to MPC encoding?
Answer:
At the moment there aren't many, but those are really not needed so much, because the preset profiles (standard,xtreme and insane) are already highly tweaked.
4.) Are there any "standard" settings for MPC (something similar to the LAME MP3 of R3MIX and DIBROM)?
Answer:
The standard setting for MPC is the standard profile used by default: mppenc file.wav file.mpc
5.) What is about the future of the MPC codec? Will it be Shareware or not?
Answer:
Maybe, maybe not..
6.) Are there any infos about the future development or changes of MPC?
Answer:
Yes, at the moment the page to check out is Frank Klemm's mpegplus page:
http://www.uni-jena.de/~pfk/mpp/
7.) On what platforms (OS) can be MPC played?
Answer:
MPC decoder is open source, so in principle on any platform which is technically capable of.
8.) What are the differences (limitation) between the 1.7.9c encoder and the 0.90l encoder?
Answer:
Check Frank's page, but at the moment the main differences are speed and functionality issues:
0.90l:
ca. 35% faster
support of 8 . . . 32 bit linear PCM
can encode also encode 1 channel files and multi channel files (only first two channels are encoded)
support of directly reading LPAC lossless compressed PCM files
support of directly reading FLAC lossless compressed PCM files
Can directly read from a pipe (max. 27 hours of audio possible)
Support of WAVE files with 2...4 GByte (if file system supports this)
some minor bug fixes (which do NOT affect audio quality)
smoother fade in and out
support of very verbose -v -v
Disadvantages of this Encoder:
no clipping protection support (will be added later in a more sophisticated way)
no "No Digital Silence" support (will be added later in a more sophisticated way)
9.) How and why should the MPC gain program be used?
Answer:
Replaygain.exe determines the EXACT peak levels of the MP+/MPC files and estimates the perceptional loudness and stores this values inside the MP+/MPC file. This can be used to secure avoid clipping and to equalize the loudness of music.
I believe someone will make better guide, but check these out:
http://www.uni-jena.de/~pfk/mpp/#replaygain
http://www.uni-jena.de/~pfk/mpp/faq.txt
http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/showth...s=&threadid=386
10.) When will the name be changed (again)

?
Answer:
Probably never. MusePack is the official name and .mpc is the official extension.