Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: problems with encoding
Hydrogenaudio Forums > Lossy Audio Compression > MP3 > MP3 - General
nico
hi,
first post and already a problem.
i have used eac for many years and never encountered this.
so..i'm using eac and the recommended lame version 3.90.3. my problem is that when it comes to encoding with --alt preset standard the bitrate is 128 constantly. i've never encountered this and don't know what i might be doing wrong here. i tried various options and all seem to be configured right, i also doublechecked with the recommended settings here. the weird thing is that when i rip let's say vinyl this does not happen. so i firgure it has something to do with the extraction of the wav files itself.

i'm grateful for any tips thx
Defsac
Sounds like EAC is using the bit rate from the bit rate dropdown box instead of APS. If you change the 'bit rate' value in compression options to 320kbps does it encode at a different bit rate?
Synthetic Soul
Can you post the command line you have in the External Compression tab please?

If you've followed the wiki it is posible your command line starts:

%l--alt-preset 128%l%h--alt-preset standard%h

If so, you may have the Low quality radio button checked. Select the High quality button and try again.
nico
QUOTE(Synthetic Soul @ Aug 16 2005, 02:12 AM)
Can you post the command line you have in the External Compression tab please?

If you've followed the wiki it is posible your command line starts:

%l--alt-preset 128%l%h--alt-preset standard%h

If so, you may have the Low quality radio button checked.  Select the High quality button and try again.
*




i am using --alt-preset standard.

@Defsac i tried encoding externally aswell with razorlame and i get the same results.thats why i thought something has to be wrong with eac and grabbing the wavs.
crying.gif

ive been sitting here hours and can't find the root of this problem...
nico
here's a screenshot

user posted image
Synthetic Soul
I'd still like to see the whole command line.

Edit: it looks like you have -B 128 in there somewhere... I'm afraid I'm not that up on it to suggest any other factors off the top of my head (without being able to check the command line).
nico
here you go

user posted image


also what seems a bit odd is that the extraction itself is very fast imo (and im not using burst mode)
Synthetic Soul
It is generally recommended to set the Parameter Passing Scheme to "User Defined Encoder". See the wiki.

With the settings you have I believe the Bitrate dropdown, as Defsac stated, is coming into play. You are therefore probably getting:

--alt-preset standard -B 160

Try changing to "User Defined Encoder" and set your command line to:

--alt-preset standard %s %d

... to start (refer to the wiki for your final settings).

Edit: this thread looks relevant.
blue57
Don't you have to choose "User defined encoder" but still point it to the Lame.exe?

And 9.7x doesnt look too fast to me.

edit: beaten up
Defsac
Are there any pops or clicks in the output mp3?
nico
ok i did as you suggested and still get the same results almost all of the encoding is in 128.

i tried ripping vinyl with wavelab just now and encoded it and i get normal results meaning vbr as it should be so i really dont know what's wrong here.
i looked at the drive options in EAC and can't find anything wrong crying.gif
nico
QUOTE(Defsac @ Aug 16 2005, 08:36 AM)
Are there any pops or clicks in the output mp3?
*




no not at all. i tried using different audio cds aswell and always get the same results.
nico
i also noticed that i cant hear the music when i play the cd in EAC.. huh.gif
Frank Bicking
As you understand German, have a look at this guide:
Audio-CDs rippen mit Exact Audio Copy
nico
first of all thanks for all your replies.after struggling for many hours i think i have found what was causing the trouble.
as i said i tried various cds for extraction+encoding, but it seems that just those cds i tried all showed the same problem when encoding.i finally gave it a last try and guess what, vbr is working with other cds.i'm happy that it works now but i still don't understand what is causing this with certain cds, is it bad mastering?

thanks again wink.gif

edit:i feel kinda stupid now but this is more then odd don't you think.shame that the ella fitzgerald boxset i have is such poor quality then
Synthetic Soul
Am I right in guessing that --alt-preset standard on 3.90.3 won't drop below 128 other than for silence?

That may explain it in part I guess.

What music would only ever require 128Kbps and below though?
Gambit
QUOTE(Synthetic Soul @ Aug 16 2005, 06:22 PM)
Am I right in guessing that --alt-preset standard on 3.90.3 won't drop below 128 other than for silence?
*

Yup.

QUOTE(Synthetic Soul @ Aug 16 2005, 06:22 PM)
What music would only ever require 128Kbps and below though?
*

Mono, for example (or both channels in a stereo stream containing the same data, eg. quasi mono).
JunkieXL
From looking at your screenshot it looks like your lame.exe file isn't located in your EAC folder. I was under the impression that you should always have your external compressor there. I could be wrong, especially since I don't speak German rolleyes.gif

I mean the lame window from the first screenshot seems to be located in a different spot than what you have selected in your EAC. C:\\programme\Lame3.90.3\lame.exe
(or whatever) and in your browse selection you chose a lame file from your My Documents or whatever that means.

Oh..and just to clarify. Whenever you are using a switch in the additional command line the bitrate drop down is ignored in EAC. So, just by having --alt-preset standard in there that drop down becomes irrelevant.

Good luck figuring this out...because from what I see of your settings there shouldn't be any major problem except what I mentioned.
J
Synthetic Soul
QUOTE(Gambit @ Aug 16 2005, 05:32 PM)
QUOTE(Synthetic Soul @ Aug 16 2005, 06:22 PM)
Am I right in guessing that --alt-preset standard on 3.90.3 won't drop below 128 other than for silence?
Yup.
Thanks for the confirm.

QUOTE(Gambit @ Aug 16 2005, 05:32 PM)
QUOTE(Synthetic Soul @ Aug 16 2005, 06:22 PM)
What music would only ever require 128Kbps and below though?
Mono, for example (or both channels in a stereo stream containing the same data, eg. quasi mono).
Ah, that seems to fit with an Ella Fitzgerald CD...
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.