Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: new information for FLAC portable players
Hydrogenaudio Forums > Lossless Audio Compression > FLAC
Pages: 1, 2
zxc
Hi,

I want to buy myself a portable player which supports FLAC files. I've found many threads considering this topic but most of them are not very recent so I just don't know if they are still valid sad.gif

Well, the most important thing: are those the ONLY portable players supporting FLAC:

# COWON's iAUDIO M3 and iAUDIO X5
# iRiver iHP-120,iHP-140
# Rio Karma

???

hope that's not a difficult question wink.gif

zxc
rjamorim
QUOTE(zxc @ Aug 26 2005, 11:02 PM)
# iRiver iHP-120,iHP-140
# Rio Karma
*


These are both not being manufactured anymore. And the iHP only supports FLAC using an unofficial firmware.
jcoalson
if you're real hard-core you can get an ipod to play FLAC, but otherwise, no, that's it. too bad about rio...

Josh
Buddy Casino
But then, the FLAC support of the iAUDIO X5 is supposed to be good, and it is (imho) the best disk-based DAP currently on the market. Just not exactly cheap... sad.gif
zxc
QUOTE(jcoalson @ Aug 27 2005, 06:02 AM)
if you're real hard-core you can get an ipod to play FLAC, but otherwise, no, that's it.  too bad about rio...

Josh
*



well, I think I will pass on this wink.gif
thx anyway

QUOTE(rjamorim @ Aug 27 2005, 04:36 AM)
QUOTE(zxc @ Aug 26 2005, 11:02 PM)
# iRiver iHP-120,iHP-140
# Rio Karma
*


These are both not being manufactured anymore. And the iHP only supports FLAC using an unofficial firmware.
*



I know they can still be found somewere on the net BUT is it a smart idea to buy a device that is not manufactured anymore - considering the possible problems with it (mostly I've been reading about hard drive failures)? I'm not really familiar with most of the things you guys are talking about on this forum but for example is there a risk that in a near future there could ba a problem with the firmware for both iRiver iHP and Rio Karma if they are not produced anymore?

what do you think?

should I consider only iAUDIO?

zxc
davidd
I don't think it would be a bad idea, I mean the companies will still support the products if something goes wrong.

I have a iRiver H120 myself and havn't had any problems with it since I bought it, and havn't heard of too many problems with it either

the iAudio X5 is quite nice though, not quite as good as the H100's w/ the rockbox firmware, but still great players (also they could possibly port rockbox to the X5 sometime)
zxc
thank you

hope other people will give some thoughts too wink.gif

another issue:

I want to have the biggest capacity possible. It seams that the biggest HD is 40GB in iAUDIO M3 and in iHP-140. is that correct?
is iAUDIO X5 only 30GB?
and iAUDIO M5 only 20GB?

zxc
legg
QUOTE(zxc @ Aug 27 2005, 12:46 PM)
well, I think I will pass on this wink.gif
thx anyway


from the ipodlinux FAQ:

QUOTE
What if something goes wrong?

Be sure to backup your music before installing iPodLinux! The worst thing that has happened so far is someone lost all of their music, because they didn't back it up before running Apple's restore utility. If anything goes wrong, you can always (no, really) use Apple's handy Firmware Restore Utility (http://www.apple.com/ipod/download/) to reinstall Apple's iPod operating system.


http://www.ipodlinux.org/FAQ


Updating the firmware of a device was a big risk in the past, now it has become something almost trivial and safe.
davidd
QUOTE(zxc @ Aug 27 2005, 04:45 PM)
I want to have the biggest capacity possible. It seams that the biggest HD is 40GB in iAUDIO M3 and in iHP-140. is that correct?
is iAUDIO X5 only 30GB?
and iAUDIO M5 only 20GB?

zxc
*



right now, that is correct. Cowon is supposed to release a 60GB version of the X5 sometime soon though, not sure if bigger M5's will come out though
ToeNipples
I say wait if you can. the 60gb x5 is coming, they also need to update the firmware for various minor bugs/missing features (id3 tags!!!) and also the next karma is coming SOME DAY, it's just a matter of when.
Digisurfer
QUOTE(ToeNipples @ Aug 27 2005, 06:04 PM)
also the next karma is coming SOME DAY, it's just a matter of when.
*


Highly doubtful in light of Rio's recent decision. Look around the forum, there was a recent post about it.
davidd
yeah, a new player from RIo isn't ever coming sadly
zxc
QUOTE(legg @ Aug 27 2005, 10:53 PM)

Updating the firmware of a device was a big risk in the past, now it has become something almost trivial and safe.
*




well as I sad before - I like to lisen to the music - but not necessary re-programing the device I use. Reading just the begining of this
http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index....showtopic=30823
made me think that it might not be as "trivial and safe" wink.gif

QUOTE(Otto42)
iPodLinux works, but isn't at the stage where I'd recommend non-coders using it yet. The problem is that the current implementation is really underutilizing the second processor and a good method to use it for things has not yet been devised. You could make it do anything, in theory, but only in the kernel code. I think most people would prefer not to hardcode it to decode audio only.


what is the status on this NOW ?


QUOTE(ToeNipples)
I say wait if you can. the 60gb x5 is coming


can somebody else confirm this?

And I would still like other people to comment on buying not manufactured player smile.gif They seams to be better that iAudio but I just dont know if I shoud buy them in this situation...

thx

zxc
legg
I must be honest, I haven't tried it myself as I don't own an ipod. However, you do have the option to choose how to "boot up" the ipod on power on, it will show a menu letting you select wether to start the device using apple's firmware or ipodlinux.

As for trivial and safe I meant that these days the probability of causing permanent damage to the device is almost null. If anything goes wrong you can flash it again with the original firmware.

project status: http://www.ipodlinux.org/Project_Status

If I had an ipod I'd try it no doubt smile.gif
zxc
hmmm...
I dont have iPod too but... hmm...
will it work on PC?
would I be able to us it as a HD?

zxc
davidd
all current iPods work on pc's. the itunes sfotware, if you want to use that only works on Win2000/XP though

the iPod can be used as a external hardrive, but only for data (the music is stored in random folders on the ipod and requires 3rd party programs to copy to a pc in correct folders and stuff)
dobz
Does flac or any other format on the iadudio X5 playback gaplessly?

The reason i ask is that anybody who wants to use high quality playback such as flac, i'd assume would also be interessted in playback as it was intended, like cd, GAPLESS..

I often wonder about how friendly the navigation and folder structure is, also as somebody above mentions theres no support for id3? seems like a very basic feature to overlook, if id3 dont work i guess you can forget about any tag support with flac?

i dont think i have to pimp rockbox but i'll give it a quicky anyway smile.gif

Rockbox it quite simply works how you want it to..

Rockbox+H140 = how playback was intended...
zxc
QUOTE(davidd @ Aug 28 2005, 08:07 PM)
all current iPods work on pc's. the itunes sfotware, if you want to use that only works on Win2000/XP though


I know that, my question was about new ipodlinux firmware - will it work also on PC? I'm not familiar with linux at all sad.gif

QUOTE(davidd @ Aug 28 2005, 08:07 PM)
the iPod can be used as a external hardrive, but only for data (the music is stored in random folders on the ipod and requires 3rd party programs to copy to a pc in correct folders and stuff)
*



I don't understand sad.gif Is mp3 or FLAC no a data file? what's the difference? and what 3rd party programs does it require?

yes, and gapless:
what does it mean 1/10th sec. gap between tracks in x5? will I hear a gap in DJ's mix?

zxc
davidd
audio files are data, so I guess I should of reworded that, I meant just music files weren't then.

and atleast with the official firmware, you need software to copy music from the ipod to a pc, not sure about with ipodlinux though. ilounge.com has a guide in their ipod 201 articles section about how to get music off the ipod
legg
They have an installer for windows, so I assume YES:
http://www.ipodlinux.org/Downloads


Funny thing, there's no Linux installer.
darin
I just bought an IAudio X5 which plays FLAC and I'm really happy with it. I liked it so much I exhanged it for the upper model which costs a $90 more. I was going to go with the ipod route and do a hacked firmware, but then you have to depend on developers to get the bugs out, upgrade, ect. That's really cool in itself, but I've been in the xbox mod scene for a few years and from experience those updates can take months and even then they burn themselves out and never get a final build.
zxc
the same here sad.gif
All this sounds nice but still I'm very reluctant about "hacked" firmware - I don't want to wind up with player that wont play FLAC. I've ben reading many forums and it seams that very often iPod has problems even with connecting to PC...
don't know, need more information...


QUOTE(darin @ Aug 29 2005, 05:40 AM)
I just bought an IAudio X5 which plays FLAC
*



does it suport more than level 2 compresion?
what's the situation with gapless?

zxc
unfortunateson
QUOTE(dobz @ Aug 28 2005, 12:33 PM)
Rockbox+H140 = how playback was intended...


cool.gif
davidd
the X5 does support all levels of FLAC compression with a official firmware update (they might even be shipping with that update by now)

and no, the X5 can't do gapless
zxc
QUOTE(davidd @ Aug 29 2005, 11:05 PM)
and no, the X5 can't do gapless
*



is the gap ACTUALLY big enough to hear it? (in DJ's mix)

QUOTE(davidd @ Aug 29 2005, 11:05 PM)
the X5 does support all levels of FLAC compression with a official firmware update (they might even be shipping with that update by now)
*



you mean that old firmware did not support all levels?

zxc
rjamorim
QUOTE(unfortunateson @ Aug 29 2005, 06:49 PM)
QUOTE(dobz @ Aug 28 2005, 12:33 PM)
Rockbox+H140 = how playback was intended...


cool.gif
*



Soon people will be claiming RockBox is the Foobar of hardware players biggrin.gif
davidd

you mean that old firmware did not support all levels?


when the player first came out, the firmware that was shipped with it only supported levels 0-2. I know they did release a firmware update to support all levels a very short time after
DreamTactix291
QUOTE(rjamorim @ Aug 29 2005, 05:31 PM)
QUOTE(unfortunateson @ Aug 29 2005, 06:49 PM)
QUOTE(dobz @ Aug 28 2005, 12:33 PM)
Rockbox+H140 = how playback was intended...


cool.gif
*



Soon people will be claiming RockBox is the Foobar of hardware players biggrin.gif
*

I remember proclaiming that in the MisticRiver IRC channel within an hour of using Rockbox laugh.gif

QUOTE(davidd @ Aug 29 2005, 05:05 PM)
the X5 does support all levels of FLAC compression with a official firmware update (they might even be shipping with that update by now)

and no, the X5 can't do gapless
*

Not yet but there is a Rockbox port in progress so it should one day.
ChangFest
QUOTE(rjamorim @ Aug 29 2005, 02:31 PM)
Soon people will be claiming RockBox is the Foobar of hardware players biggrin.gif
*



Well foobar2000 is easy to find and free and an iRiver Hxxx is not. Shucks.
darin
QUOTE
level 2 compresion?
what's the situation with gapless?

zxc
*



Yes...it supports all levels of compression for FLAC. Some of my files are level 1, orthers are level 5, and other files I have are level 8. The firmware update is very easy and that was the first thing I did when I got mine. It's a program you download onto your pc and just simply run it and it does the rest while your X5 pluged into the PC. I don't think it supports gapless, but I was lestioning to a DJ Dan the other day and I didn't notice any breaks between tracks. Dude, I love mine... I feel naked without it.
zxc
Hi again

sorry for not replying earlier - I'm a little sick lately

Thank you for all the information but although they are very useful I feel more confused that I was sad.gif

I summerize my problem:

I need to buy portable player that:

(Those features are a MUST)

* supports FLAC
* works as an external drive for PC
and
* has the best capacity/price ratio (at least 20GB)

I am also concerned about:

* gapless playback
* flawless rewinding
* abillity to charge it with wall charger
* reasonable warranty (longer than 90 days)
* good firmware support

All the aditional features (like radio, LCD etc.) are not that important.

and now I have those questions:

1. is it WISE (from the firmware point of view) to buy not manufactured any more Rio Karma and iRiver? could there be problems with warranty for them? or maybe in a year or two the player won't be able to support new version of FLAC or other formats?
2. is it WISE to consider to buy iPod and replace firmware with ipodlinux? would such a player meet my criteria?
3. what is the REAL deal with gapless in x5?
QUOTE(darin)

I was lestioning to a DJ Dan the other day and I didn't notice any breaks between tracks.


was it a DJ's MIX - no gaps between tracks? did you pay attencion to it or just "didn't notice" but actually there WAS a gap?

4. do rio karma and H1xxx only suport tag navigation? no folders browsing?
5. what would be RESONABLE price for H120, H140 and Rio Karma?

will you help me?

zxc
Cartoon
I can answer part of question 4... The Rio Karma ONLY support ID3-tag browsing -- no concept of folders/files.

In my book, that is a good thing as it fits perfectly in how I organize my music (by tags) and I couldn't care less about file/directory (or folders as you young'uns call them). Maybe part of the reason for that is how well the Rio Music Manager works...

I can see the reason behind directory based navigation, but I got too much music for that. YMMV smile.gif
davidd
the H100's use filetree by default, but you can chose to use a database mode with both the official firmware and the rockbox firmware

for prices, the Karma goes for around $200 new, and as for the H100's, it depends on the condition of them, I have seen new H120's go for as much as $350 on ebay

as for warranties, iRiverAmerica is really good at supporting their products after you make contact with them, which could take awhile. they shouldn't honor the warranty if you flashed to unofficial firmware like rockbox... but I haven't heard of them doing that yet. not quite sure about with Rio as I havn't ever dealt with their customer service
Defsac
QUOTE(ChangFest @ Aug 30 2005, 10:27 AM)
Well foobar2000 is easy to find and free and an iRiver Hxxx is not. Shucks.
That's not really a fair comparison (unless you got your PC and Windows free with foobar2000). The hardware for both costs money (although PC hardware is obviously easier to find than an iRiver).
zxc
thank you very much guys

I hope others will answer to the rest of the problems

thx again

zxc
beto
if you don't mind me asking, why exactly FLAC support is a must for you? That kind of narrows your options big time at the moment...
unfortunateson
Using Iriver's H1x0 w/ Rockbox firmware:

QUOTE(zxc @ Sep 2 2005, 11:50 PM)
I summerize my problem:

I need to buy portable player that:

(Those features are a MUST)

* supports FLAC
* works as an external drive for PC

yes and yes.

QUOTE(zxc @ Sep 2 2005, 11:50 PM)
and
* has the best capacity/price ratio (at least 20GB)

Because they are rare to find, I got my H140 (40GB) for $435. Not the greatest deal, but I can't complain with how great this player is.

QUOTE(zxc @ Sep 2 2005, 11:50 PM)
I am also concerned about:

* gapless playback
* flawless rewinding
* abillity to charge it with wall charger
* reasonable warranty (longer than 90 days)
* good firmware support



yes, not quite (depends on format), yes, yes (1 year warranty), yes (w/ alternate firmware, Rockbox is amazing)

QUOTE(zxc @ Sep 2 2005, 11:50 PM)
All the aditional features (like radio, LCD etc.) are not that important.


The H1x0 series has radio, lcd, and remote.

QUOTE(zxc @ Sep 2 2005, 11:50 PM)
and now I have those questions:
do rio karma and H1xxx only suport tag navigation? no folders browsing?

I only use folder browsing on my H140, never wanted to use its database software.
QUOTE(zxc @ Sep 2 2005, 11:50 PM)
what would be RESONABLE price for H120, H140

Although a bit pricey, I find $435 to be reasonable for what the H140 can do.

If I had to buy a new portable, and couldn't find an H140 (they are pretty damn hard to find), I would wait a few months to see how the development of the Rockbox port on Iriver's H340 is progressing.

zxc
QUOTE(beto @ Sep 3 2005, 10:32 AM)
if you don't mind me asking, why exactly FLAC support is a must for you? That kind of narrows your options big time at the moment...
*




well, 3 months ago consulting this forum I choose FLAC as a format for my quite large music collection - it was supposed to be the best hardware suported format - and now it would be really painful to re-format it.
what other player/format (loosless) would you sugest?

@unfortunateson
thank you. H1xx really seams like a great player byt this price sad.gif little too much that I can afford at the moment sad.gif

QUOTE(unfortunateson)
If I had to buy a new portable, and couldn't find an H140 (they are pretty damn hard to find), I would wait a few months to see how the development of the Rockbox port on Iriver's H340 is progressing.


are they working on FLAC support?

zxc
davidd
when they get rockbox working on the H300's, they should support all the same formats as the H100 does. the hardware isn't that different between the two
zxc
when could that possibly happen? I didn't find any dates at http://www.rockbox.org/twiki/bin/view/Main/ReleaseNotes

zxc
beto
QUOTE(zxc @ Sep 3 2005, 09:37 PM)
well, 3 months ago consulting this forum I choose FLAC as a format for my quite large music collection - it was supposed to be the best hardware suported format - and now it would be really painful to re-format it.
what other player/format (loosless) would you sugest?

*



Why don't you transcode your lossless files to mp3 or vorbis to use in your portable? It's quite easy and you hardly will note any difference. Lossless is overkill for portable use IMO and you would need lots of space in your portable.

If you absolutely need lossless for your portable (beats me why anyone would need that) then FLAC is the way to go and the suggestions already made in this thread are all that's available in the market at the moment.
zxc
QUOTE(beto @ Sep 4 2005, 07:34 AM)
Why don't you transcode your lossless files to mp3 or vorbis to use in your portable? It's quite easy and you hardly will note any difference.


out of question wink.gif

QUOTE(beto @ Sep 4 2005, 07:34 AM)
the suggestions already made in this thread are all that's available in the market at the moment.
*



well, they don't answer all my questions that's why I still need help wink.gif

zxc
Digisurfer
QUOTE(zxc @ Sep 5 2005, 02:45 PM)
QUOTE(beto @ Sep 4 2005, 07:34 AM)
Why don't you transcode your lossless files to mp3 or vorbis to use in your portable? It's quite easy and you hardly will note any difference.


out of question wink.gif
*


Wow, there is anal, and then there is ANAL hehe. I thought I was bad, but even I don't mind transcoding my lossless files to Vorbis (at 96k, but that is mainly because of file size limitations) for use on my portable player, even though it can play FLAC files gaplessly. My hat is off to you sir. wink.gif
beto
QUOTE(zxc @ Sep 5 2005, 05:45 PM)
out of question wink.gif
*



ok, suit yourself. tongue.gif

unfortunately I cannot help you more. I do not use lossless+portable. sorry. wink.gif
Febs
QUOTE(zxc @ Sep 3 2005, 11:15 PM)
when could that possibly happen? I didn't find any dates at http://www.rockbox.org/twiki/bin/view/Main/ReleaseNotes

zxc
*



http://www.rockbox.org/twiki/bin/view/Main...eleased_for_the
zxc
QUOTE(beto @ Sep 6 2005, 05:49 AM)
QUOTE(zxc @ Sep 5 2005, 05:45 PM)
out of question wink.gif
*



ok, suit yourself. tongue.gif

unfortunately I cannot help you more. I do not use lossless+portable. sorry. wink.gif
*




QUOTE(Digisurfer @ Sep 5 2005, 11:11 PM)
Wow, there is anal, and then there is ANAL hehe. I thought I was bad, but even I don't mind transcoding my lossless files to Vorbis (at 96k, but that is mainly because of file size limitations) for use on my portable player, even though it can play FLAC files gaplessly. My hat is off to you sir. wink.gif
*



he, he. I know that loosy is more convinient but the convinience is not an issue here - I did spend a LOT of time to encode to FLAC not to have it in convinient form but to have it in LOSSLESS quailty. Now it's a problem with portable player that's why I'm asking you guys for help wink.gif Otherwise I'd do it meself biggrin.gif

hope somebody will help tongue.gif

QUOTE(Febs @ Sep 6 2005, 07:19 AM)
QUOTE(zxc @ Sep 3 2005, 11:15 PM)
when could that possibly happen? I didn't find any dates at http://www.rockbox.org/twiki/bin/view/Main/ReleaseNotes

zxc
*



http://www.rockbox.org/twiki/bin/view/Main...eleased_for_the
*




QUOTE
Will Rockbox be released for the H300 series? When will it be ready?
Short answer: when it's ready.

Longer answer: In mid-August


It's Septemper now that's why I'm asking wink.gif

zxc
DreamTactix291
You didn't read that very closely dry.gif

QUOTE
Longer answer: In mid-August, Linus Feltzing started the process of tracing the circuitry of the H3xx series to create a schematic for it. The schematic was required before Linus could hook up a BDM wiggler to write a Rockbox bootloader for the H3xx series. As of 18 August 2005, he estimated that he would have a prototype bootloader for the H3xx series completed in "weeks." On 24 August 2005, Linus ran his first BDM wiggler session on his H320. Thus, progress is being made on the H3xx bootloader.

What does this mean? On the H1xx series, it took approximately 6 months from the time that a bootloader was written until music playback was possible on the player. Just two and a half months later, a huge amount of progress has been made, but Rockbox for the H1xx still has not been formally "released" and there are still some features that need to be implemented and bugs that need to be corrected. What it does mean that those who are coding for the Rockbox project will soon be able to work on the code for the H3xx series on the player itself and adapt existing code for the idiosyncracies of the H3xx. It is likely that the timeline for the H3xx series from bootloader to music playback will be significantly shorter than it was for the H1xx series because of the similarities between those two players.

Bottom line: this news should not be read to say that there will be a functional version of Rockbox for the H3xx series within weeks. However, it does mean that progress is being made, and that the rate of progress will probably increase in the relatively near future.

That means in mid-August work began on a bootloader. It still will be quite some time before the H300 has a working firmware, just not as long as the H100s had to wait.
zxc
QUOTE(DreamTactix291 @ Sep 6 2005, 12:11 PM)
You didn't read that very closely  dry.gif

That means in mid-August work began on a bootloader.  It still will be quite some time before the H300 has a working firmware, just not as long as the H100s had to wait.
*



you are right, I 'm sorry - I guess I'm still not fully awaken
thank you for pointing this out

zxc
zxc
QUOTE(DreamTactix291 @ Sep 6 2005, 12:11 PM)
You didn't read that very closely  dry.gif

That means in mid-August work began on a bootloader.  It still will be quite some time before the H300 has a working firmware, just not as long as the H100s had to wait.
*



you are right, I 'm sorry - I guess I'm still not fully awaken
thank you for pointing this out

zxc
snookerdoodle
QUOTE(zxc @ Sep 6 2005, 10:05 AM)
he, he. I know that loosy is more convinient but the convinience is not an issue here - I did spend a LOT of time to encode to FLAC not to have it in convinient form but to have it in LOSSLESS quailty. Now it's a problem with portable player that's why I'm asking you guys for help wink.gif Otherwise I'd do it meself biggrin.gif

Well now you have at least one of us curious (me). I do (as I noticed at least one other person here does) exactly what you say is unacceptable: all of my music is on my hd in flac format and I convert it to mp3 "on the fly" to my mp3 player when I want it portable. While I've never done an ABX in a Real World Scenario (playing back through my car, listening while working out), I doubt that, in those scenarios, I'd notice a difference. Likewise, when I'm working, the music is, for all intents and purposes, Elevator Music and I don't think I'd notice.

So, my curiosity, if you don't mind humoring me, is: are you using this portable in such a way that you actually Sit Quietly And Listen to it (as opposed to what I described above)?

Mark
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.