Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: LAME - FAST or no?
Hydrogenaudio Forums > Lossy Audio Compression > MP3 > MP3 - General
Bobby Black
HI 2 EVERYone!!!


I have an important question 4 the EXPERTs of LAME --preset,
especially about the new 'FAST' option.

Wich settings are better for QUALITY of the MP3
with or without the 'FAST' option?

What does the 'FAST' option for QUALITY?

So for example what is better?

--PRESET FAST EXTREME or --PRESET EXTREME ?
--PRESET FAST STANDARD or --PRESET STANDARD ?
--PRESET FAST MEDIUM or --PRESET MEDIUM?

THX for U help!

CU
BB99
Lyx
Use the forum-search function and read the pinned threads.
rutra80
Short answer is that fast is better because it's faster, and in most cases isn't of worse quality than non-fast (and sometimes is even better).
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.